| Literature DB >> 35570970 |
Ye Yang1, Min Wang2, Wei-Lin Sang3, Ying-Ying Zhang4, Wei Liu5, Su-Fang Wu1.
Abstract
Objectives: We aim to build a students' own engagement in original microbiological course-based undergraduate research experience (CUREs) model served two research and teaching scientific purposes including students' scientific literacy skills and instructors' role, which could further be applied as contribution to broader scientific knowledge and conduct novel research in their future research experience and careers.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing; course-based undergraduate research experiences; scientific literacy skills; student-driven; vaginal microorganisms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35570970 PMCID: PMC9096218 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.870301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Stage goals, activities, and focal skills associated with each phase of the project.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Planning | 1–2 January to February 2021 | Reading primary literature Propose hypotheses Experimental design Online science communication with instructors | Search suitable clinical and laboratory technology to detect vaginal microorganism species community. |
| #2 | Implementing | 3–6 March to June in 2021 | Collect vaginal samples in the outpatient department | |
| General bacterial culture techniques | Identify the 10 most abundant vaginal microorganism genera between the premenopausal and postmenopausal groups. | |||
| 16S rRNA gene sequencing | PCR amplification, OTU and community taxonomy system analysis at the genus level, COG-based functional structure distribution to identify species classification and analysis of colony differences at genus level. | |||
| #3 | Summarizing | 7–10 July to October in 2021 | Data interpretation | Describe the outcome of abundance and diversity of microbial communities through 16S rRNA analysis. Compare differences in microorganism diversity in female vaginal fluids between the premenopausal and postmenopausal group. |
| Statistical inference | Mann-Whitney U-tests and Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction for non-parametric data; | |||
| Graphical inference | ||||
| Collaborative writing manuscript | ||||
| #4 | Feedback | 11–12 November to December in 2021 | For Students and instructors | Exposing feedback loops, facing obstacles, multiple connections among outcomes. |
Figure 1CUREs project served two research and teaching scientific purposes including students' scientific literacy skills and instructors' role.
Figure 2Framework in target, obstacle, solution, and goal of CUREs students reach.
List of main associated literature in planning phase students prepared of Vaginal Microbiome.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| The Structure and diversity of strain-level variation | Species-level diversity of vaginal microbiome communities change with respect to the reproductive stages of a woman. Vaginal microbial communities will differ in terms of number and strength of interspecies interactions, in turn have implications for the relative resistance and resilience of each community type to disturbances. | Eppinger et al. ( |
| In Various Urogenital Disorders | VMB can impact the pathogenesis of urinary tract infection (UTI). | Yildirim et al. ( |
| In vaginal infections and inflammatory conditions | Interplay between the cervicovaginal microbiota and the cell of immune system is determinant to prevent infections by external pathogens and to maintain an immuno-tolerant environment. Common vaginal strains as | Torcia ( |
| In Gynecologic Cancers. | The vaginal microbiome, in addition to its role in common conditions such as vaginitis and HPV infection, may also have an impact on the development or prevention of gynecological cancers. | Champer et al. ( |
| During pregnancy | Preterm birth is associated with increased vaginal microbiome instability compared to term birth High-risk vaginal microbiota linked to PPROM are observed closer to the time of membrane rupture, dominance of the vaginal microbiota by non-Lactobacillus spp. at any gestational age increases risk. | Stout et al. ( |
| Vaginal Microbiome Techniques | high-throughput 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. | Ricci et al. ( |
Figure 3Steps of flow chart for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing.
Figure 4Distribution of vaginal microorganisms in premenopausal and postmenopausal women using general bacterial culture techniques. (A,B) Vaginal secretion triple test: Candida albicans, the dominant bacterial population related to a higher positive rate of leukocyte esterase (A) and poorer cleanliness (B). Staphylococcus epidermidis, the main bacterial population, was related to decreased hydrogen peroxide content (C), a higher sialidase content existed in the Enterococcus faecalis population (D). Women carrying Lactobacillus as the primary bacterial population were less susceptible to certain pathogens, such as Candida albicans (E). There was no significant difference in lactobacillus as the dominant bacteria between the premenopausal and postmenopausal groups (F). There was also no significant difference in Lactobacillus, as the dominant bacteria, distribution in different phases of the menstrual cycle (G). Among them, Lactobacillus dominated 65.9% (27/41) in pregnant women and 55.22% (307/556) of non-pregnant women (H).
Figure 5Community taxonomy system at the genus level and COG-based functional structure distribution. (A) Taxonomic composition distribution graph showing the relative sample microorganism classification abundance. The horizontal or vertical axis is the sample number or relative abundance ratio. The width of different colors indicates the relative abundance ratio of different species at the taxonomic level. Left panel: Bray-Curtis-based sample clustering tree diagram; middle panel part: Histogram of species abundance of clustering order; right panel: Illustration of the species. (B) A functional abundance heat map based on COG was drawn using the functional abundance matrix. Each column represents a sample, the row represents the function, and the color block represents the functional abundance value. The redder the color is, the higher the abundance, and the more blue the color is, and the lower the distance. Samples from the same group have the same color. Sample distance is represented by the length of the branches. The more similar the samples are, the closer the branches of the same color in the figure are from the same group. (A) RNA processing and modification; (B) Chromatin structure and dynamics; (C) Energy production and conversion; (D) Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning; (E) Amino acid transport and metabolism; (F) Nucleotide transport and metabolism; (G) Carbohydrate transport and metabolism; (H) Coenzyme transport and metabolism; (I) Lipid transport and metabolism; (J) Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; (K) Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis; (L) Transcription; (M) Replication, recombination and repair; (N) Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis; (O) Cell motility; (P) Post-translational modification, protein turnover, and chaperones; (Q) Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism; (R) General function prediction only; (S) Function unknown; (T) Signal transduction mechanisms; (U) Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; (V) Defense mechanisms; (W) Extracellular structures; (Y) Nuclear structure; (Z) Cytoskeleton; (C) Distribution bar plot.
Figure 6The dominant flora and heatmap of genera from the tree diagram. The dominant flora in premenopausal (A) and postmenopausal (B) groups. The difference in abundance in samples on a branch is compared using a colored pie chart. Different colors represent different samples, and the larger the fan area of the color, the higher the abundance of the sample on the branch. The semicircle on the right indicates the species abundance composition of the sample, while the left semicircle indicates the proportion of different samples in the dominant species. The length and width represent the abundance and distribution ratio of species in the sample. Heat map of the top 50 species classifications at the genus-level species abundance matrix from a tree diagram. The distribution of flora in different phases of the menstrual cycle and postmenopausal women is shown in premenopausal women (C), postmenopausal (D) and both (E) groups. The same sample group has the same color. Each column in the figure represents a sample, and the row represents the community structure. The color blocks represent relative species abundance values. The redder the color, the higher the relative abundance, while the bluer the color, the lower the relative abundance. The color shade reflects the abundance of the community distribution, and clustering reflects community similarities and different distributions at each classification level.
Evaluation by students and instructors over CUREs project.
|
|
| |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| HS | Reference review | Reference review | Reference review | Reference review | Teach reviewing skills | Reference review | Reference review | Reference review | Reference review | Teach reviewing skills |
| E | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | ||
| SS | Self-study and efficacy | |||||||||
| E | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
| HS | Report literature summary | Proposed experimental hypotheses | Report literature summary | Proposed experimental hypotheses | Ensure experimental strategies technically feasible | Report literature summary | Proposed experimental hypotheses | Proposed experimental hypotheses | Report literature summary | Organize and summarize conference |
| E | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | ||
| SS | Expression capability, and professional research communication skills | |||||||||
| E | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | ||
| HS | Design Flow chart step 1–5 | Design Flow chart step 1–5 | Design Flow chart step 1–5 | Design Flow chart step 1–5 | Modify flow chart | Design Flow chart step 1–5 | Design Flow chart step 6–10 | Design Flow chart step 6–10 | Design Flow chart step 6–10 | Modify flow chart |
| E | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| HS | Collect sample, Analysis results | Analysis results | Collect sample, Analysis results | Analysis results | Verify data | Analysis results | Collect sample, Analysis results | Analysis results | Collect sample, Analysis results | Verify data |
| E | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| HS | Flow chart step 1–5; Reference, find solution | Flow chart step 1–5; Reference, find solution | Flow chart step 1–5; Reference, find solution | Flow chart step 1–5; Reference, find solution | Direct experiment step by step, reduce technological barriers | Reference, find solution; Flow chart step 6–10 | Reference, find solution; Flow chart step 6–10 | Reference, find solution; Flow chart step 6–10 | Reference, find solution; Flow chart step 6–10 | Direct experiment step by step reduce technological barriers |
| E | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||
| SS | Motivation and ownership | |||||||||
| E | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | ||
| SS | Overcome failure, benefit persistence and patience | |||||||||
| E | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | ||
| SS | Professional science identity, competence, and confidence in collaboration | |||||||||
| E | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||
| SS | Spirit of rigorous and carefulness | |||||||||
| E | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| HS | Taxonomy and OUT analysis | Taxonomy and OUT analysis | Taxonomy and OUT analysis | Taxonomy and OUT analysis | Guidance on data analysis and statistical figure | COG functional distribution and species classification | COG functional distribution and species classification | COG functional distribution and species classification | COG functional distribution and species classification | Guidance on data analysis and statistical figure |
| E | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
| HS | Statistical analysis with SPSS and Prism | Statistical analysis with SPSS and Prism | Statistical analysis with SPSS and Prism | Statistical analysis with SPSS and Prism | Encourage drafting emails | Statistical analysis with SPSS and Prism | Statistical analysis with SPSS and Prism | Statistical analysis with SPSS and Prism | Statistical analysis with SPSS and Prism | Help them overcome barrier of shy |
| E | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | ||
| SS | Obtain authorship, independent and logical thinking capability | |||||||||
| HS | Write search reports | Write search reports | Write search reports | Write search reports | Write search reports | Write search reports | Write search reports | Write search reports | ||
| E | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||
| SS | Achieve summarizing ability and confidence enhancement | |||||||||
| E | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | ||
HS, hard skills.
S, soft skills.
E, evaluation, marked with self-evaluation score: Greatly improved: 3; Better improved: 2; General improved: 1; No improve: 0.