Yuanyuan Tu1, Dadi Wan1, Qunli Wang1. 1. Orthopaedic Medical Center, Haikou Affiliated Hospital of Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine, Haikou Hainan, 570208, P. R. China.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the difference in leg length discrepancy (LLD) between robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and traditional THA. Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM databases were searched by computer to collect cohort studies of robot-assisted and traditional THAs from inception to August 11th, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 10 high-quality cohort studies were included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared with traditional THA, LLD after robot-assisted THA was smaller [ MD=-1.64, 95% CI (-2.25, -1.04), P<0.001], Harris scores at 3 and 12 months after operation were higher [ MD=1.50, 95% CI (0.44, 2.57), P=0.006; MD=7.60, 95% CI (2.51, 12.68), P=0.003]. However, the operative time was longer [ MD=8.36, 95% CI (4.56, 12.17), P<0.000 1], and the postoperative acetabular anteversion angle was larger [ MD=1.91, 95% CI (1.43, 2.40), P<0.001]. There was no significant difference in Harris score at 6 months, amnesia index (Forgotten joint score, FJS), postoperative acetabular abduction angle, and incidence of complication between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion: Robot-assisted THA is superior to traditional THA in postoperative LLD.
Objective: To systematically evaluate the difference in leg length discrepancy (LLD) between robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) and traditional THA. Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM databases were searched by computer to collect cohort studies of robot-assisted and traditional THAs from inception to August 11th, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 10 high-quality cohort studies were included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared with traditional THA, LLD after robot-assisted THA was smaller [ MD=-1.64, 95% CI (-2.25, -1.04), P<0.001], Harris scores at 3 and 12 months after operation were higher [ MD=1.50, 95% CI (0.44, 2.57), P=0.006; MD=7.60, 95% CI (2.51, 12.68), P=0.003]. However, the operative time was longer [ MD=8.36, 95% CI (4.56, 12.17), P<0.000 1], and the postoperative acetabular anteversion angle was larger [ MD=1.91, 95% CI (1.43, 2.40), P<0.001]. There was no significant difference in Harris score at 6 months, amnesia index (Forgotten joint score, FJS), postoperative acetabular abduction angle, and incidence of complication between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion: Robot-assisted THA is superior to traditional THA in postoperative LLD.
Entities:
Keywords:
Meta-analysis; Robot assist system; cohort study; systematic review; total hip arthroplasty
Authors: John M Redmond; Asheesh Gupta; Jon E Hammarstedt; Alexandra E Petrakos; Nathan A Finch; Benjamin G Domb Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2014-08-08 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Benjamin G Domb; Jeffrey W Chen; Ajay C Lall; Itay Perets; David R Maldonado Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: William L Bargar; Carol A Parise; Andrea Hankins; Natalie A Marlen; Valentina Campanelli; Nathan A Netravali Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2017-10-06 Impact factor: 4.757