Literature DB >> 35570628

[Short-term effectiveness of MAKO robot assisted complex total hip arthroplasty].

Yang Wang1, Baochao Ji1, Yongjie Chen1, Guoqing Li1.   

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the short-term effectiveness of MAKO robot assisted complex total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Methods: The clinical data of 15 patients (17 hips) underwent MAKO robot assisted complex THA between May 2020 and June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 5 males and 10 females with the age ranged from 19 to 70 years (median, 49 years), included 9 cases (9 hips) of developmental dysplasia of the hip (Crowe type Ⅱ in 5 hips, type Ⅲ in 1 hip, and type Ⅳ in 3 hips), 1 case (2 hips) of rheumatoid arthritis, 2 cases (3 hips) of ankylosing spondylitis, 3 cases (3 hips) of secondary arthritis with a history of acetabular fracture and internal fixation. The acetabular cup abduction angle and anteversion angle were measured at 3 months after operation, and compared with those measured by MAKO robot system before and immediately after operation. The femoral offset and leg length discrepancy (LLD) were measured at 3 months after operation, which were compared with those before operation. Harris hip score (HHS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were used to evaluate hip function before operation and at 3 months after operation.
Results: All 15 patients (17 hips) completed the operation successfully. The operation time was 75-175 minutes, with an average of 116.3 minutes; the intraoperative blood loss was 100-800 mL, with an average of 381.3 mL. Two patients were not included in the statistics because of intraoperative and postoperative complications, the remaining 13 patients (15 hips) had no serious complication such as vascular and nerve injuries, and 3 patients had intermuscular vein thrombosis. The 13 patients (15 hips) were followed up 3-15 months, with an average of 8 months. At last follow-up, the position of prosthesis did not change and there was no signs of loosening. There was no significant difference in acetabular abduction angle at immediate and 3 months after operation when compared with preoperative one ( P>0.05), and the acetabular anteversion angle was significantly lower than that before operation ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in acetabular abduction angle and anteversion angle between at immediate and 3 months after operation ( P>0.05). The LLD, offset, HHS score, and VAS score were significantly improved at 3 months after operation when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05).
Conclusion: MAKO robot assisted complex THA can achieve good short-term effectiveness, improve the hip range of motion, reduce the length difference between bilateral lower limbs, and improve the quality of patients' life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MAKO robot; Total hip arthroplasty; complex hip disease

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35570628      PMCID: PMC9108643          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202109054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  12 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Jeffery J Cherian; Randa K Elmallah; Todd P Pierce; Julio J Jauregui; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 2.  The influence of spine-hip relations on total hip replacement: A systematic review.

Authors:  C Rivière; J-Y Lazennec; C Van Der Straeten; E Auvinet; J Cobb; S Muirhead-Allwood
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.256

3.  New technique: practical procedure of robotic arm-assisted (MAKO) total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jianghui Qin; Zhihong Xu; Jin Dai; Dongyang Chen; Xingquan Xu; Kai Song; Dongquan Shi; Qing Jiang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-09

4.  Robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty: Clinical outcomes and complication rate.

Authors:  Itay Perets; John P Walsh; Mary R Close; Brian H Mu; Leslie C Yuen; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.547

5.  The Use of Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Jonathan M Vigdorchik; Abhinav K Sharma; Vinay K Aggarwal; Kaitlin M Carroll; Seth A Jerabek
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-09-08

Review 6.  A review of the evolution of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Padmanabhan Subramanian; Tom W Wainwright; Shayan Bahadori; Robert G Middleton
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  The learning curve of robotic-arm assisted acetabular cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Sujith Konan; Sumon S Huq; Mazin S Ibrahim; Atif Ayuob; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Comparison of the accuracy of the cup position and orientation in total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip between the Mako robotic arm-assisted system and computed tomography-based navigation.

Authors:  Wataru Ando; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Keisuke Uemura; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Robotic arm-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nicholas D Clement; Paul Gaston; Allison Bell; Philip Simpson; Gavin Macpherson; David F Hamilton; James T Patton
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 5.853

10.  Use of Robotic-Arm Assisted Technique in Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wei Chai; Ren-Wen Guo; Ken Lee Puah; Seth Jerabek; Ji-Ying Chen; Pei-Fu Tang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 2.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.