Literature DB >> 35570625

[Study on the accuracy of automatic segmentation of knee CT images based on deep learning].

Ping Song1,2,3, Zheqi Fan1,2,3, Xin Zhi2,3, Zheng Cao2,3,4, Shengfeng Min5, Xingyu Liu5,6, Yiling Zhang5, Xiangpeng Kong2,3, Wei Chai2,3.   

Abstract

Objective: To develop a neural network architecture based on deep learning to assist knee CT images automatic segmentation, and validate its accuracy.
Methods: A knee CT scans database was established, and the bony structure was manually annotated. A deep learning neural network architecture was developed independently, and the labeled database was used to train and test the neural network. Metrics of Dice coefficient, average surface distance (ASD), and Hausdorff distance (HD) were calculated to evaluate the accuracy of the neural network. The time of automatic segmentation and manual segmentation was compared. Five orthopedic experts were invited to score the automatic and manual segmentation results using Likert scale and the scores of the two methods were compared.
Results: The automatic segmentation achieved a high accuracy. The Dice coefficient, ASD, and HD of the femur were 0.953±0.037, (0.076±0.048) mm, and (3.101±0.726) mm, respectively; and those of the tibia were 0.950±0.092, (0.083±0.101) mm, and (2.984±0.740) mm, respectively. The time of automatic segmentation was significantly shorter than that of manual segmentation [(2.46±0.45) minutes vs. (64.73±17.07) minutes; t=36.474, P<0.001). The clinical scores of the femur were 4.3±0.3 in the automatic segmentation group and 4.4±0.2 in the manual segmentation group, and the scores of the tibia were 4.5±0.2 and 4.5±0.3, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups ( t=1.753, P=0.085; t=0.318, P=0.752).
Conclusion: The automatic segmentation of knee CT images based on deep learning has high accuracy and can achieve rapid segmentation and three-dimensional reconstruction. This method will promote the development of new technology-assisted techniques in total knee arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; deep learning; image segmentation; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35570625      PMCID: PMC9108645          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202201072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of Segmentation algorithms for Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Aaron Fenster; Bernard Chiu
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2005

2.  Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information.

Authors:  Stefan Klein; Uulke A van der Heide; Irene M Lips; Marco van Vulpen; Marius Staring; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty: A Review.

Authors:  Heather S Haeberle; James M Helm; Sergio M Navarro; Jaret M Karnuta; Jonathan L Schaffer; John J Callaghan; Michael A Mont; Atul F Kamath; Viktor E Krebs; Prem N Ramkumar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Preoperative CT-Based Three-Dimensional Templating in Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty More Accurately Predicts Implant Sizes than Two-Dimensional Templating.

Authors:  J R T Pietrzak; F E Rowan; B Kayani; M J Donaldson; S S Huq; F S Haddad
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence and Orthopaedics: An Introduction for Clinicians.

Authors:  Thomas G Myers; Prem N Ramkumar; Benjamin F Ricciardi; Kenneth L Urish; Jens Kipper; Constantinos Ketonis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Metrics to evaluate the performance of auto-segmentation for radiation treatment planning: A critical review.

Authors:  Michael V Sherer; Diana Lin; Sharif Elguindi; Simon Duke; Li-Tee Tan; Jon Cacicedo; Max Dahele; Erin F Gillespie
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 6.901

Review 7.  Navigation and robotics improved alignment compared with PSI and conventional instrument, while clinical outcomes were similar in TKA: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kai Lei; LiMing Liu; Xin Chen; Qing Feng; Liu Yang; Lin Guo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 4.114

8.  Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  B Kayani; S Konan; J Tahmassebi; J R T Pietrzak; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 5.082

9.  Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review.

Authors:  Naoki Nakano; Haitham Shoman; Fernando Olavarria; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Ryosuke Kuroda; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.075

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.