Swaroop Revannasiddaiah1, Prathap Raja Varma Muppalla Ayalgaraj Nagaraju2, Rasmi Palassery1, Apoorva Jagadish3, Vinayak V Maka1, Nalini Kilara1, Damiano Rondelli4, Santhosh Kumar Devadas5. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, India. 2. Department of Regulatory Affairs-Drugs, Biologics and Medical Devices, College of Professional Studies, Northeastern University, MB, Boston, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Centre, Sheveport, USA. 4. Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, USA. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, India. hidrhere@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) predominantly affects older patients; many of whom do not undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) despite the associated survival benefits. This study was conceived to investigate the patterns of AHSCT among MM patients with due regard to their age and standardized fitness assessments. METHODS: Fitness scores as per the hematopoietic stem cell transplant-comorbidity index (HSCT-CI) and risk scores as per the revised-myeloma comorbidity index (R-MCI) of MM patients treated between January 2017 and December 2019 were analyzed to assess fitness for AHSCT. Proportions of patients who underwent AHSCT were calculated with regard to age and fitness for AHSCT. RESULTS: Of the 81 eligible patient records with a median age of 62 years, the HSCT-CI classified 79.6% and 77.8% of patients aged ≤65 years and >65 years as AHSCT eligible (p 1). Using the R-MCI, 96.3% and 81.5% of patients aged ≤65 years and >65 years, respectively, were classified as eligible for AHSCT (p 0.0381). Overall, patients aged ≤65 years underwent AHSCT with a greater frequency compared to those aged >65years (38.9 vs. 14.8%, p 0.0402). Irrespective of the age group, there was a statistically significant difference (p 0.0167) in terms of survival which favored those who underwent AHSCT. CONCLUSIONS: Both the HSCT-CI and the R-MCI revealed that nearly 80% of patients aged >65 years were fit enough to receive AHSCT. However, far fewer patients of this age group underwent AHSCT. We propose that the routine inclusion of objective fitness assessment could ensure that fit older patients undergo AHSCT and thus do not miss out on the benefits of the same.
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) predominantly affects older patients; many of whom do not undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) despite the associated survival benefits. This study was conceived to investigate the patterns of AHSCT among MM patients with due regard to their age and standardized fitness assessments. METHODS: Fitness scores as per the hematopoietic stem cell transplant-comorbidity index (HSCT-CI) and risk scores as per the revised-myeloma comorbidity index (R-MCI) of MM patients treated between January 2017 and December 2019 were analyzed to assess fitness for AHSCT. Proportions of patients who underwent AHSCT were calculated with regard to age and fitness for AHSCT. RESULTS: Of the 81 eligible patient records with a median age of 62 years, the HSCT-CI classified 79.6% and 77.8% of patients aged ≤65 years and >65 years as AHSCT eligible (p 1). Using the R-MCI, 96.3% and 81.5% of patients aged ≤65 years and >65 years, respectively, were classified as eligible for AHSCT (p 0.0381). Overall, patients aged ≤65 years underwent AHSCT with a greater frequency compared to those aged >65years (38.9 vs. 14.8%, p 0.0402). Irrespective of the age group, there was a statistically significant difference (p 0.0167) in terms of survival which favored those who underwent AHSCT. CONCLUSIONS: Both the HSCT-CI and the R-MCI revealed that nearly 80% of patients aged >65 years were fit enough to receive AHSCT. However, far fewer patients of this age group underwent AHSCT. We propose that the routine inclusion of objective fitness assessment could ensure that fit older patients undergo AHSCT and thus do not miss out on the benefits of the same.
Authors: A Xhaard; R Porcher; J W Chien; R P de Latour; M Robin; P Ribaud; V Rocha; A Devergie; C Ferry; P J Martin; G Socié Journal: Leukemia Date: 2008-08-07 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: S K Kumar; A Dispenzieri; M Q Lacy; M A Gertz; F K Buadi; S Pandey; P Kapoor; D Dingli; S R Hayman; N Leung; J Lust; A McCurdy; S J Russell; S R Zeldenrust; R A Kyle; S V Rajkumar Journal: Leukemia Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 11.528