| Literature DB >> 35569917 |
Koichi Azuma1, Huihui Xiang2, Tomoyuki Tagami3, Rika Kasajima2, Yumiko Kato3, Sachise Karakawa3, Shinya Kikuchi3, Akira Imaizumi3, Norikazu Matsuo4, Hidenobu Ishii4, Takaaki Tokito4, Akihiko Kawahara5, Kenta Murotani6, Tetsuro Sasada7, Yohei Miyagi2, Tomoaki Hoshino8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Amino acid metabolism is essential for tumor cell proliferation and regulation of immune cell function. However, the clinical significance of free amino acids (plasma-free amino acids (PFAAs)) and tryptophan-related metabolites in plasma has not been fully understood in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors.Entities:
Keywords: Immunotherapy; Lung Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Translational Medical Research; Tumor Biomarkers
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35569917 PMCID: PMC9109096 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004420
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunother Cancer ISSN: 2051-1426 Impact factor: 12.469
Patient characteristics and their association with OS
| Patient characteristics | Total (N=53) | Cox hazard model | ||
| HR | 95% CI | P value | ||
| Age (years), mean (SD) | 69.7 (8.5) | 1.23 | 0.88 to 1.74 | 0.232 |
| Sex, n (%) | ||||
| Female | 13 (25) | 1 | ||
| Male | 40 (75) | 0.92 | 0.44 to 1.92 | 0.826 |
| Smoking, n (%) | ||||
| Former | 40 (75) | 1 | ||
| Never | 13 (25) | 1.46 | 0.71 to 3.01 | 0.318 |
| Performance Status, n (%) | ||||
| 0–1 | 38 (71) | 1 | ||
| 2–3 | 15 (29) | 2.17 | 1.06 to 4.44 | 0.043 |
| Stage, n (%) | ||||
| Stage III (recurrent after chemoradiotherapy) | 7 (13) | 1 | ||
| Recurrent after surgery | 14 (26) | 2.25 | 0.47 to 10.72 | 0.308 |
| Stage IV | 32 (60) | 4.85 | 1.14 to 20.67 | 0.033 |
| Histology, n (%) | ||||
| Non-squamous | 38 (72) | 1 | ||
| Squamous | 15 (28) | 1.38 | 0.65 to 2.92 | 0.410 |
| Driver mutation, n (%) | ||||
| Wild Type | 41 (77) | 1 | ||
| EGFR (Epidermal growth factor receptor) | 11 (21) | 0.64 | 0.26 to 1.56 | 0.306 |
| ALK (Anaplastic lymphoma kinase) | 1 (2) | (EGFR or ALK/WT) | ||
| Tumor PD-L1 expression, n (%) | ||||
| 0%–49% | 21 (45) | |||
| 50%–100% | 26 (55) | 1.23 | 0.60 to 2.51 | 0.232 |
| Treatment line, n (%) | ||||
| 1st line | 20 (38) | 1 | ||
| 2nd line | 22 (42) | 0.76 | 0.36 to 1.60 | 0.471 |
| 3rd line | 7 (13) | 0.75 | 0.30 to 1.88 | 0.540 |
| 4th line | 2 (4) | (3rd line or later/1st line) | ||
| 6th and 7th lines | 2 (4) | |||
| PD-1 blocker, n (%) | ||||
| Nivolumab | 25 (47) | 1 | ||
| Pembrolizumab | 28 (53) | 1.37 | 0.70 to 2.66 | 0.358 |
| Blood test, mean (SD) | ||||
| Albumin (g/dL) | 3.42 (0.61) | 0.57 | 0.38 to 0.85 | 0.005 |
| LDH (lactate dehydrogenase, U/L) | 2634 (118) | 1.13 | 0.81 to 1.49 | 0.448 |
| White blood cell (/μL) | 7513 (3357) | 1.35 | 0.98 to 1.75 | 0.062 |
| Lymphocyte (/μL) | 1354 (615) | 0.58 | 0.38 to 0.86 | 0.006 |
| Neutrophil (/μL) | 5476 (2969) | 1.50 | 1.10 to 1.97 | 0.011 |
| Eosinophil (/μL) | 176 (178) | 0.80 | 0.52 to 1.15 | 0.248 |
| Monocyte (/μL) | 477 (223) | 1.49 | 1.05 to 2.02 | 0.027 |
| Neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio | 4.94 (3.56) | 1.72 | 1.27 to 2.25 | <0.001 |
Categorical variables are shown as the distribution of corresponding patient numbers. Continuous variables are shown as mean and SD values.
Univariate analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazard model for OS. HR, 95% CI.
ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; OS, overall survival; PS, performance status; WT, wild type.
Association between PFAA and metabolite concentrations before ICI therapy and OS
| PFAA/metabolite (μM) | Mean (SD) | Cox hazard model | ||
| HR | 95% CI | P value | ||
| Glutamic acid | 50.5 (22.2) | 1.03 | 0.71 to 1.45 | 0.863 |
| Serine | 101.6 (27.4) | 0.72 | 0.50 to 1.03 | 0.075 |
| Asparagine | 41.9 (10.8) | 0.73 | 0.47 to 1.06 | 0.107 |
| Glycine | 207.4 (64.5) | 0.69 | 0.45 to 1.00 | 0.049 |
| Glutamine | 543.4 (101.6) | 0.77 | 0.51 to 1.16 | 0.213 |
| Histidine | 65.0 (23.0) | 0.52 | 0.30 to 0.86 | 0.009 |
| Threonine | 107.4 (41.8) | 0.58 | 0.34 to 0.91 | 0.015 |
| Alanine | 305.2 (110.6) | 0.60 | 0.41 to 0.87 | 0.006 |
| Citrulline | 30.4 (13.1) | 0.61 | 0.39 to 0.92 | 0.018 |
| Arginine | 74.1 (20.3) | 0.42 | 0.27 to 0.64 | <0.001 |
| Proline | 151.3 (63.3) | 0.80 | 0.53 to 1.11 | 0.199 |
| α-Amino butyric acid | 17.5 (6.0) | 0.99 | 0.70 to 1.39 | 0.977 |
| Tyrosine | 63.5 (17.4) | 0.79 | 0.52 to 1.14 | 0.234 |
| Valine | 210.5 (63.7) | 0.78 | 0.52 to 1.12 | 0.193 |
| Methionine | 22.1 (7.5) | 0.75 | 0.46 to 1.12 | 0.183 |
| Ornithine | 64.9 (13.4) | 0.72 | 0.46 to 1.10 | 0.126 |
| Lysine | 175.7 (49.1) | 0.70 | 0.47 to 1.03 | 0.069 |
| Isoleucine | 69.2 (29.7) | 0.90 | 0.56 to 1.22 | 0.566 |
| Leucine | 120.8 (47.7) | 0.87 | 0.55 to 1.22 | 0.471 |
| Phenylalanine | 62.1 (13.3) | 1.23 | 0.83 to 1.82 | 0.294 |
| Tryptophan | 46.8 (17.8) | 0.53 | 0.34 to 0.83 | 0.005 |
| 3h-kynurenine | 0.069 (0.050) | 1.85 | 1.27 to 2.60 | 0.002 |
| 3h-anthranilic acid | 0.047 (0.036) | 1.37 | 0.86 to 1.96 | 0.166 |
| 5h-indol-3-acetic acid | 0.070 (0.062) | 1.02 | 0.68 to 1.33 | 0.923 |
| 5h-tryptophan | 0.005 (0.009) | 1.38 | 0.99 to 1.74 | 0.054 |
| Anthranilic acid | 0.019 (0.016) | 1.47 | 1.13 to 1.82 | 0.007 |
| Indol-3-acetic acid | 1.996 (1.771) | 0.81 | 0.51 to 1.12 | 0.236 |
| Indol-3-lactic acid | 0.862 (0.551) | 0.96 | 0.67 to 1.28 | 0.810 |
| Kynurenic acid | 0.049 (0.027) | 1.22 | 0.83 to 1.73 | 0.293 |
| Kynurenine | 2.448 (0.716) | 1.37 | 0.96 to 1.95 | 0.083 |
| Picolinic acid | 0.054 (0.033) | 1.18 | 0.82 to 1.63 | 0.358 |
| Quinolinic acid | 0.730 (0.515) | 1.34 | 1.00 to 1.69 | 0.049 |
| Serotonin | 0.159 (0.152) | 1.09 | 0.70 to 1.55 | 0.680 |
| Xanthurenic acid | 0.011 (0.012) | 0.91 | 0.60 to 1.29 | 0.572 |
| Neopterin | 0.010 (0.009) | 1.50 | 1.10 to 1.92 | 0.014 |
| N′-formyl-kynurenine | 0.018 (0.014) | 0.82 | 0.46 to 1.14 | 0.295 |
The concentrations of PFAAs and metabolites are shown as mean and SD values.
Univariate analysis of PFAAs and metabolites before ICI therapy was conducted using the Cox proportional hazard model for OS. HR, 95% CI and P values are shown.
ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; OS, overall survival; PFAA, plasma-free amino acid.
Figure 1Multivariate model for prognosis of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor. (A) Kaplan-Meier analysis for OS in the subgroups stratified by the multivariate model. The cut-off values between the high-risk and the low-risk groups at the following three points: first quartile value, median value and third quartile value. Cox HR (95% CI) and p value (log-rank test) are shown. (B) Univariate regression analysis for the association of patient characteristics with the multivariate model. The cut-off value of the multivariate model was set at the third quartile score. Continuous prognostic factors were divided at the median value. ORs about tumor stage and mutation were not determined because all patients with stage III (recurrent after chemoradiotherapy) or Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations were stratified into the high-risk group. (C) Kaplan-Meier analysis for OS in the subgroups stratified by the multivariate model in the high (≥50%, n=26) or low (<50%, n=21) PD-L1 expression group. The cut-off values between the high-risk and low-risk groups were set at the median value. Cox HR (95% CI) and p value (log-rank test) are shown. NLR, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio; OS, overall survival.
Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival
| Prognostic factors | Cox hazard model | ||
| HR | 95% CI | P value | |
| Tumor stage (recurrent after surgery and stage VI/recurrent-after chemoradiotherapy) | 5.00 | 0.64 to 39.06 | 0.125 |
| Performance status (2–3/0–1) | 3.18 | 1.35 to 7.51 | 0.008 |
| PD-L1 expression (50%–100%/0%–49%) | 1.24 | 0.56 to 2.78 | 0.596 |
| Monocyte (median) | 0.64 | 0.29 to 1.40 | 0.264 |
| Neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (median) | 2.17 | 0.75 to 6.25 | 0.151 |
| Albumin (median) | 1.59 | 0.68 to 3.69 | 0.283 |
| Multivariate model (median) | 3.55 | 1.47 to 8.59 | 0.005 |
Each prognostic factor for overall survival was evaluated by multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis.
Figure 2Immune cell constitution of PBMCs in the high-risk and low-risk groups. (A) Violin plots depicting immune cell subtypes in PBMCs from the high-risk and low-risk groups by the multivariate model. Fractions of immune cells were deconvoluted by the CIBERSORT algorithm from RNA-seq data in PBMCs and compared between the high-risk and low-risk groups using Student’s t-test. Blue, low-risk group; orange, high-risk group. (B) Heatmap of Spearman’s correlations among immune cell subtypes. Red, positive correlation; blue, negative correlation; white, no correlation. (C) Correlations between immune-related gene expression in PBMCs and PFAAs/tryptophan metabolites. Heatmap of Spearman’s correlations between gene expression levels of immune-related genes and concentrations of 4 PFAAs/metabolite selected in the multivariate model (arginine, serine, glycine, and quinolinic acid) are shown. The genes were grouped by immune pathways. Red, positive correlation; blue, negative correlation; white, no correlation. NK, natural killer; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell.
Figure 3Identification of AAMGs differentially expressed between the high-risk and low-risk groups. (A) Venn plot of AAMGs among the DEGs. (B) Volcano plot of DEGs. AAMGs were labeled in the plot with gene names. Red dots, upregulated genes; blue dots: downregulated genes; gray dots, stable genes. (C) Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS in the subgroups stratified by RNA expression level of three AAMGs, SLC11A1, HAAO, and PHGDH, in PBMCs. Cut-off values between the high and low groups were set at the median of gene expression levels. P values (log-rank test) are shown. (D) Correlations between 12 DEG–AAMGs in PBMCs and PFAAs/tryptophan metabolites. Heatmap of Spearman’s correlations between expression levels of 12 DEG–AAMGs and concentrations of 4 PFAAs/metabolites selected in the multivariate model (arginine, serine, glycine, and quinolinic acid) are shown. Red, positive correlation; blue, negative correlation; white, no correlation. (E) Scatter plots of the HAAO gene expression in PBMCs versus concentrations of quinolinic acid or arginine (left half). Scatter plots of the SLC11A1 gene expression in PBMCs verus concentrations of serine or arginine (right half). The correlations were evaluated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient analysis. R indicates correlation coefficient. amino acid metabolism-related gene; DEG, differentially expressed gene; HAAO, 3-Hydroxy Anthranilic Acid Dioxygenase; OS, overall survival; PFAA, plasma-free amino acid.