Literature DB >> 35569593

Proposing a standardized assessment of COVID-19 vaccine-associated cutaneous reactions.

Rhea Singh1, Rowanne Ali2, Sonya Prasad3, Steven T Chen4, Kimberly Blumenthal5, Esther E Freeman6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; adverse reactions; dermatology; grading scale; severity; vaccines

Year:  2022        PMID: 35569593      PMCID: PMC9098805          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol        ISSN: 0190-9622            Impact factor:   15.487


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: No standardized grading scale exists for the full spectrum of COVID-19 vaccine–associated cutaneous reactions, and the time cutoff of what is potentially attributable to vaccination is unclear. Skin reactions to prior vaccines have been characterized by severity scales that generally do not specify cutaneous reactions to the vaccines. , COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials used the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) toxicity grading scale for healthy adult and adolescent volunteers enrolled in preventive vaccine clinical trials (FDA toxicity scale). Only local injection site cutaneous reactions were categorized on this scale, with little granularity to the grading of specific dermatologic conditions. This incomplete picture does not allow for the proper severity grading, assessment, and treatment of dermatology patients. A Medline/PubMed database literature search of allergic reaction, drug reaction, and dermatologic reaction severity grading scales published from January 2000 to December 2021 was conducted for relevant literature using the following Medical Subject Headings terms: allergic reaction, severity grading scales, drug reactions, and vaccine reactions. The number of citations for each scale was identified and the 10 most cited scales for each type of reaction were evaluated. The search was subsequently expanded to include relevant terminology on the basis of the initial searches; for example, “NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE),” “Ring and Messmer scale,” and “Toxicity grading scale for healthy adult/adolescent volunteers enrolled in preventive vaccine clinical trials” were included to encompass the most common assessment instruments used/adapted for reaction severity grading. Each scale's relevancy to grading COVID-19 vaccine–associated cutaneous reactions was assessed using a standardized data extraction tool. We reviewed 30 articles encompassing the most cited allergic reaction scales, drug reaction scales, dermatologic reaction scales, and vaccine characterization scales. Of these, the 10 most relevant scales were analyzed for consideration in the COVID-19 vaccine–associated cutaneous reaction grading process. The FDA's toxicity scale contained relevant details on local reactions but lacked details on other types of rashes seen after vaccination. The Brighton Collaboration criteria, Ring and Messmer scale, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network criteria were appropriate for acute onset skin reactions and anaphylaxis; however, they were not useful for describing delayed or chronic cutaneous reactions seen after vaccination. The scale capable of grading the broadest spectrum of COVID-19 vaccine–associated skin reactions was the National Cancer Institute’s CTCAE scale, which has been previously adapted for drug-associated cutaneous reactions. We therefore mapped known COVID-19 vaccine–associated cutaneous reactions to the FDA’s Toxicity Grading Scale (local reactions) and National Cancer Institute’s CTCAE scale (generalized reactions) (Tables I and II ). In general, the CTCAE scale suggests that a Grade 1 reaction involves <10% body surface area, a Grade 2 reaction involves 10% to 30% body surface area, and a Grade 3 reaction involves >30% body surface area. We suggest that cutaneous reactions can be attributed to the COVID-19 vaccine only if the first instance occurs within 21 days of vaccine administration to align with prior data analysis of adverse events by authors from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Immunization Safety Office.
Table I

Local injection site reactions that are immediate or delayed in onset: recommendation to classify according to the US Food and Drug Administration Toxicity Grading Scale∗

Local reactionsMild (Grade 1)Moderate (Grade 2)Severe (Grade 3)Potentially life threatening (Grade 4)
PainDoes not interfere with activityRepeated use of nonnarcotic pain reliever >24 h or interferes with activityAny use of narcotic pain reliever or prevents daily activityEmergency room visit or hospitalization
Erythema/redness2.5-5 cm5.1-10 cm>10 cmNecrosis or exfoliative dermatitis
Induration and swelling2.5-5 cm and does not interfere with activity5.1-10 cm or interferes with activity>10 cm or prevents daily activityNecrosis
TendernessMild discomfort to touchDiscomfort with movementSignificant discomfort at restEmergency room visit or hospitalization

Immediate reactions are defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as reactions within less than 4 hours of vaccine administration.

The highest grade reached in any category (pain/redness/swelling/tenderness) determines the overall grade.

Table II

Generalized reactions: recommendation to classify according to adapted National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 criteria

Generalized reactionsGrade 1Grade 2Grade 3Grade 4Grade 5
PruritusMild or localized; topical intervention indicatedWidespread and intermittent; skin changes from scratching (eg, edema, papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts); oral intervention indicated; limiting instrumental ADLWidespread and constant; limiting self-care ADL or sleep; systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy indicated
UrticariaUrticarial lesions covering <10% BSAUrticarial lesions covering 10%-30% BSA; oral intervention indicatedUrticarial lesions covering >30% BSA; requiring injectable (IV/IM/subcutaneous) therapy
MorbilliformMacules/papules covering <10% BSA with or without symptoms (eg, pruritus, burning, and tightness)Macules/papules covering 10%-30% BSA with or without symptoms (eg, pruritus, burning, and tightness); limiting instrumental ADL; rash covering >30% BSA with or without mild symptomsMacules/papules covering >30% BSA with moderate or severe symptoms; limiting self-care ADL
Zoster/shinglesLocalized, local intervention indicatedLocal infection with moderate symptoms; oral intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADLSevere or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated; IV intervention indicated; limiting self-care ADLLife-threatening consequences: urgent intervention indicatedDeath
VesicularAsymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicatedModerate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADLSevere or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated; limiting self-care ADLLife-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicatedDeath
Pityriasis rosea§Macules/papules covering <10% BSA with or without symptoms (eg, pruritus, burning, tightness)Macules/papules covering 10%-30% BSA with or without symptoms (eg, pruritus, burning, tightness); limiting instrumental ADL; rash covering >30% BSA with or without mild symptomsMacules/papules covering >30% BSA with moderate or severe symptoms; limiting self-care ADL
Pernio/chilblains||Faint discoloration, no pain, intervention not indicatedMarked discoloration, mild pain, intervention not indicatedMarked discoloration, significant pain, intervention indicated
Erythema multiformeTarget lesions covering <10% BSA and not associated with skin tendernessTarget lesions covering 10%-30% BSA and associated with skin tendernessTarget lesions covering >30% BSA and associated with oral or genital erosionsTarget lesions covering >30% BSA; associated with fluid or electrolyte abnormalities; ICU care or burn unit indicatedDeath
Bullous diseaseAsymptomatic; blisters covering <10% BSABlisters covering 10%-30% BSA; painful blisters; limiting instrumental ADLBlisters covering >30% BSA; limiting self-care ADLBlisters covering >30% BSA; associated with fluid or electrolyte abnormalities; ICU care or burn unit indicatedDeath
ErythromelalgiaMinimal skin changes or dermatitis (eg, erythema, edema) without painMinimal skin changes (eg, erythema, edema) with mild pain; tingling and burning sensation; limiting instrumental ADLMinimal skin changes (eg, erythema, edema) with significant pain; severe tingling and burning sensation; limiting self-care ADL
Filler reaction#MildCosmetically significantCosmetically significant and interfering with function
Angioedema∗∗AsymptomaticSymptomatic, not interfering with functionSymptomatic bronchospasm with or without urticaria; interfering with functionLife threateningDeath
Contact dermatitis††Covering <10% BSA and no associated erythema or pruritus; additional medical intervention over baseline not indicatedCovering 10%-30% BSA and associated with erythema or pruritus; limiting instrumental ADL; topical or oral intervention indicated; additional medical intervention over baseline indicatedCovering >30% BSA and associated with pruritus; limiting self-care ADL; medically significant but not immediately life threatening; IV intervention indicated
VasculitisAsymptomatic, intervention not indicatedModerate symptoms, medical intervention indicatedSevere symptoms, medical intervention indicated (eg, steroids)Life-threatening consequences; evidence of peripheral or visceral ischemia; urgent intervention indicatedDeath
AlopeciaHair loss of <50% of normal for the individual that is not obvious from a distance but only on close inspection; a different hair style may be required to cover the hair loss, but it does not require a wig or hair piece to camouflageHair loss of ≥50% normal for that individual that is readily apparent to others; a wig or hair piece is necessary if the patient desires to completely camouflage the hair loss; associated with psychosocial impact
PetechiaeFew petechiaeModerate petechiae; purpuraGeneralized petechiae or purpura
Livedo reticularis#MildCosmetically significantCosmetically significant and interfering with function
New dermatologic conditionAsymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicatedModerate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADLSevere or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated; limiting self-care ADLLife-threatening consequences: urgent intervention indicatedDeath
Flare of an existing dermatologic conditionAsymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicatedModerate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age-appropriate instrumental ADLSevere or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated; limiting self-care ADLLife-threatening consequences: urgent intervention indicatedDeath

ADL, Activities of daily living; BSA, body surface area; ICU; intensive care unit; IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous.

Consistent with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) nomenclature, a semicolon indicates “or” within the description of the grade.

Immediate acute urticaria <24 hours; delayed acute urticaria <6 weeks; chronic urticaria ≥6 weeks. The scale presented in the table is from CTCAE version 5.0. The CTCAE includes “topical intervention needed” under grade 1; however, in order to align more closely with Allergy and Immunology guidelines, we have removed this from our proposed grading system. Alternatively, a scale that is used by Allergy and Immunology is “The diagnosis and management of acute and chronic urticaria: 2014 update.” Stage 1: monotherapy with second generation antihistamine + avoidance of triggers. Stage 2: add another second generation antihistamine or H2 antagonist or leukotriene receptor antagonist + first generation antihistamine at bedtime. Stage 3: dose advancement of potent antihistamine. Stage 4: add omalizumab, cyclosporine, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressants, or biologics.

Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders” generalized category.

Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Maculo-papular rash” category.

Not present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Lymphedema” and “Vasculitis” categories.

Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome” category.

Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 3.0 “Striae” cosmetic reactions category.

Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Allergic Reactions” and “Bronchospasm” categories.

Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Eczema” and “Dry Skin” categories.

Local injection site reactions that are immediate or delayed in onset: recommendation to classify according to the US Food and Drug Administration Toxicity Grading Scale∗ Immediate reactions are defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as reactions within less than 4 hours of vaccine administration. The highest grade reached in any category (pain/redness/swelling/tenderness) determines the overall grade. Generalized reactions: recommendation to classify according to adapted National Cancer Institute’s Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 criteria ADL, Activities of daily living; BSA, body surface area; ICU; intensive care unit; IM, intramuscular; IV, intravenous. Consistent with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) nomenclature, a semicolon indicates “or” within the description of the grade. Immediate acute urticaria <24 hours; delayed acute urticaria <6 weeks; chronic urticaria ≥6 weeks. The scale presented in the table is from CTCAE version 5.0. The CTCAE includes “topical intervention needed” under grade 1; however, in order to align more closely with Allergy and Immunology guidelines, we have removed this from our proposed grading system. Alternatively, a scale that is used by Allergy and Immunology is “The diagnosis and management of acute and chronic urticaria: 2014 update.” Stage 1: monotherapy with second generation antihistamine + avoidance of triggers. Stage 2: add another second generation antihistamine or H2 antagonist or leukotriene receptor antagonist + first generation antihistamine at bedtime. Stage 3: dose advancement of potent antihistamine. Stage 4: add omalizumab, cyclosporine, anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressants, or biologics. Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders” generalized category. Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Maculo-papular rash” category. Not present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Lymphedema” and “Vasculitis” categories. Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome” category. Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 3.0 “Striae” cosmetic reactions category. Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Allergic Reactions” and “Bronchospasm” categories. Not explicitly present in CTCAE version 5.0 and, therefore, this was adapted from the version 5.0 “Eczema” and “Dry Skin” categories. The adoption of standardized terminology and grading for COVID-19 vaccine–associated skin reactions will assist researchers and clinicians in better characterizing vaccine reactions and providing appropriate counseling for patients as vaccines against COVID-19 continue to be needed globally.

Conflicts of interest

Dr Chen has received honoraria from Pfizer and Novartis for serving on an advisory board for digital media. Dr Freeman is a member of the American Academy of Dermatology COVID-19 Ad Hoc Task Force, is an Editor for the British Journal of Dermatology, and is an author of COVID-19 dermatology for UpToDate. Authors Singh, Ali, and Prasad and Dr Blumenthal have no conflicts of interest to declare.
  4 in total

1.  Adaptation of a previously validated vaccination report card for use in adult vaccine clinical trials to align with the 2007 FDA Toxicity Grading Scale Guidance.

Authors:  Josephine M Norquist; Shazia S Khawaja; Cizely Kurian; T Christopher Mast; Kai-Li Liaw; Michael N Robertson; Barbara Evans; David Gutsch; Patricia Saddier
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A grading system for local skin reactions developed for clinical trials of an intradermal and transcutaneous ETEC vaccine.

Authors:  Ramiro L Gutiérrez; Chad K Porter; Abel Jarell; Ashley Alcala; Mark S Riddle; George W Turiansky
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  A post hoc analysis utilizing the FDA toxicity grading scale to assess injection site adverse events following immunization with the live attenuated Zoster Vaccine (ZVL).

Authors:  Zoran Popmihajlov; Lei Pang; Elizabeth Brown; Amita Joshi; Shu-Chih Su; Susan S Kaplan; English D Willis
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Surveillance for Adverse Events After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination.

Authors:  Nicola P Klein; Ned Lewis; Kristin Goddard; Bruce Fireman; Ousseny Zerbo; Kayla E Hanson; James G Donahue; Elyse O Kharbanda; Allison Naleway; Jennifer Clark Nelson; Stan Xu; W Katherine Yih; Jason M Glanz; Joshua T B Williams; Simon J Hambidge; Bruno J Lewin; Tom T Shimabukuro; Frank DeStefano; Eric S Weintraub
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 56.272

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.