Literature DB >> 35569088

Comparison of the retrosplenial cortex size between the degu (Octodon degus) and the Wistar rat (Rattus norvegicus).

Hideshi Shibata1, Tetsuhito Kigata2,3.   

Abstract

The degu (Octodon degus) is a rodent that normally constructs burrows for nesting and rearing. To navigate inside these burrows, degus may use idiothetic and/or sensory cues more than visual information, which is less effective in burrows. Spatial information for navigation is processed in several key brain regions including the retrosplenial cortex (RS). However, the structural characteristics of the degu RS have not been previously reported. The present study measured the sizes of the RS and constituent areas 29 and 30 in the degu, and compared these to those found in the rat, which is a terrestrial rodent. The proportion of the rostrocaudal length of the entire RS relative to that of the entire cortex was significantly larger in degus versus rats. The proportion of the rostrocaudal length of the RS at levels rostral to the splenium of the corpus callosum relative to that of the entire cortex was also significantly larger in degus versus rats. Furthermore, the ratio of the estimated volume of area 29 relative to that of area 30 was significantly larger in degus versus rats. These results show that the degu has a rostrocaudally longer rostral RS with a larger area 29 compared to the rat, which suggests that these structural features may be relevant to differences in spatial information processing between the fossorial degu and terrestrial rat.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Japanese Association of Anatomists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degu; Nissl staining; Rat; Retrosplenial cortex; Size

Year:  2022        PMID: 35569088     DOI: 10.1007/s12565-022-00669-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Int        ISSN: 1447-073X            Impact factor:   1.741


  40 in total

1.  Intrinsic connections of the cingulate cortex in the rat suggest the existence of multiple functionally segregated networks.

Authors:  B F Jones; H J Groenewegen; M P Witter
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Anatomical analysis of afferent projections to the medial prefrontal cortex in the rat.

Authors:  Walter B Hoover; Robert P Vertes
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Topographic distribution of cortical projection cells in the rat subiculum.

Authors:  Yoshiko Honda; Norio Ishizuka
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 3.304

4.  Projections of the medial orbital and ventral orbital cortex in the rat.

Authors:  Walter B Hoover; Robert P Vertes
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  Heterogeneous spatial representation by different subpopulations of neurons in the subiculum.

Authors:  J R Brotons-Mas; S Schaffelhofer; C Guger; S M O'Mara; M V Sanchez-Vives
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Afferent fibers to rat cingulate cortex.

Authors:  D M Finch; E L Derian; T L Babb
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 7.  Octodon degus. A useful animal model for social-affective neuroscience research: basic description of separation distress, social attachments and play.

Authors:  Valentina Colonnello; Paolo Iacobucci; Thomas Fuchs; Ruth C Newberry; Jaak Panksepp
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 8.  The medial prefrontal cortex in the rat: evidence for a dorso-ventral distinction based upon functional and anatomical characteristics.

Authors:  Christian A Heidbreder; Henk J Groenewegen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Head-direction cells in the rat posterior cortex. I. Anatomical distribution and behavioral modulation.

Authors:  L L Chen; L H Lin; E J Green; C A Barnes; B L McNaughton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The evolutionary diversity of locomotor innovation in rodents is not linked to proximal limb morphology.

Authors:  Brandon P Hedrick; Blake V Dickson; Elizabeth R Dumont; Stephanie E Pierce
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.