| Literature DB >> 35568838 |
Na Zhou1, Zhengqiu Huang2, Mingzhou Yu2, Shuli Deng1, Baiping Fu3, Hanhui Jin4.
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS: To compare the irrigation efficiency with different needle working length and different root canal curvature based on a real unshaped root canal using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method.Entities:
Keywords: Computational fluid dynamics analysis; Flat-needle; Irrigation flow; Needle working length; Root canal curvature
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35568838 PMCID: PMC9107698 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02205-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Fig. 1a Micro-CT scanning from a maxillary first molar; b geometrical root canal model with a 30-G flat needle with x, y, and z positions
Fig. 2a The root canal irrigation model with different needle working depth; b the root canal irrigation model with different curvature
Fig. 3Effect of needle working length on the irrigation flow field. a Streamlines; b velocity vectors
Effect of needle working depth on irrigation efficiency in a real 23.4°-curved-root canal with a 30-G flat needle
| Needle working length (mm) | Depth of effective velocity* (mm) | Effective shear stress# | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean span (mm) | Clean depth (mm) | ||
| 4.75 | 9.50 | 4.96 | 9.04 |
| 5 | 9.75 | 4.69 | 9.01 |
| 5.25 | 9.69 | 4.84 | 8.78 |
| 5.5 | 9.08 | 4.65 | 8.59 |
*Effective velocity: > 0.1 m/s; #effective shear stress: ≥ 100 Pa
Fig. 4Effect of needle working length on shears tress, displayed in the -x and x directions respectively a 0–100 Pa; b 100–800 Pa
Fig. 5Effect of curvature on the irrigation flow field
Effect of root canal curvature on irrigation efficiency in modified root canals with a 30-G flat needle at 4.75 mm needle working length
| Root canal curvature (mm) | Depth of effective velocity* (mm) | Effective shear stress# | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean span (mm) | Clean depth (mm) | ||
| 0° | 8.62 | 2.06 | 8.37 |
| 5° | 8.58 | 1.94 | 8.35 |
| 10° | 8.83 | 2.79 | 8.40 |
| 20° | 9.31 | 3.17 | 8.77 |
| 30° | 9.30 | 3.92 | 8.86 |
*Effective velocity: > 0.1 m/s; #effective shear stress: ≥ 100 Pa
Fig. 6Effect of curvature on stress shear, displayed in the -x and z directions respectively a 0–100 Pa; b 100–800 Pa
Comparison of irrigation efficiency between real curved canal and modified curved canal
| Curved root canal | Depth of effective velocity* (mm) | Effective shear stress# | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clean span (mm) | Clean depth (mm) | ||
| Real 23.4° | 9.50 | 4.96 | 9.04 |
| Modified 20° | 9.31 | 3.17 | 8.77 |
| Modified 30° | 9.30 | 3.92 | 8.86 |
Real 23.4°: Real canal with a curvature of 23.4°; Modified 20°: Modified canal with a curvature of 20°; Modified 30°: Modified canal with a curvature of 30°
*Effective velocity: > 0.1 m/s
#Effective shear stress: ≥ 100 Pa