| Literature DB >> 35568345 |
Martin Berger1, Lukas Pirpamer1, Edith Hofer2, Stefan Ropele1, Marco Duering3, Benno Gesierich4, Ofer Pasternak5, Christian Enzinger6, Reinhold Schmidt7, Marisa Koini1.
Abstract
Extracellular free water (FW) increases are suggested to better provide pathophysiological information in brain aging than conventional biomarkers such as fractional anisotropy. The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between conventional biomarkers, FW in white matter hyperintensities (WMH), FW in normal appearing white matter (NAWM) and in white matter tracts and executive functions (EF) with a speed component in elderly persons. We examined 226 healthy elderly participants (median age 69.83 years, IQR: 56.99-74.42) who underwent brain MRI and neuropsychological examination. FW in WMH and in NAWM as well as FW corrected diffusion metrics and measures derived from conventional MRI (white matter hyperintensities, brain volume, lacunes) were used in partial correlation (adjusted for age) to assess their correlation with EF with a speed component. Random forest analysis was used to assess the relative importance of these variables as determinants. Lastly, linear regression analyses of FW in white matter tracts corrected for risk factors of cognitive and white matter deterioration, were used to examine the role of specific tracts on EF with a speed component, which were then ranked with random forest regression. Partial correlation analyses revealed that almost all imaging metrics showed a significant association with EF with a speed component (r = -0.213 - 0.266). Random forest regression highlighted FW in WMH and in NAWM as most important among all diffusion and structural MRI metrics. The fornix (R2=0.421, p = 0.018) and the corpus callosum (genu (R2 = 0.418, p = 0.021), prefrontal (R2 = 0.416, p = 0.026), premotor (R2 = 0.418, p = 0.021)) were associated with EF with a speed component in tract based regression analyses and had highest variables importance. In a normal aging population FW in WMH and NAWM is more closely related to EF with a speed component than standard DTI and brain structural measures. Higher amounts of FW in the fornix and the frontal part of the corpus callosum leads to deteriorating EF with a speed component.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Cognitive speed; Corpus callosum; Executive functions; Fornix; Free water diffusion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35568345 PMCID: PMC9465649 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage ISSN: 1053-8119 Impact factor: 7.400
Demographics and risk factors of the cohort.
| age (median (IQR)) | 69.83 (56.99–74.42) |
| sex (f/m) | 133 / 93 |
| hypertension (yes) | 143 |
| diabetes (yes) | 24 |
| hypercholesterolemia (yes) | 175 |
| Body mass index (mean (SD)) | 26.1 (4.4) |
| current smoker (yes) | 29 |
Characteristics of the imaging parameters.
| mean | SD | min | max | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FW.NAWM | 4.90E-02 | 3.06E-01 | −3.40E-01 | 1.47E+00 |
| FW.WMH | 2.95E-01 | 6.80E-02 | 1.33E-01 | 5.06E-01 |
| ADt.NAWM | 9.37E-04 | 1.63E-05 | 8.37E-04 | 9.77E-04 |
| ADt.WMH | 9.28E-04 | 5.54E-05 | 7.94E-04 | 1.18E-03 |
| FAt.NAWM | 5.33E-01 | 1.63E-02 | 4.42E-01 | 5.67E-01 |
| FAt.WMH | 4.89E-01 | 5.18E-02 | 3.67E-01 | 6.94E-01 |
| MDt.NAWM | 5.97E-04 | 9.18E-07 | 5.94E-04 | 5.99E-04 |
| MDt.WMH | 5.99E-04 | 9.94E-07 | 5.96E-04 | 6.03E-04 |
| RDt.NAWM | 4.04E-04 | 8.11E-06 | 3.81E-04 | 4.39E-04 |
| RDt.WMH | 4.32E-04 | 2.36E-05 | 3.18E-04 | 4.95E-04 |
| WMH volume | −5.80E+00 | 1.05E+00 | −9.29E+00 | −2.51E+00 |
| nBV | 1.49E+06 | 8.18E+04 | 1.21E+06 | 1.72E+06 |
Abbreviations: FW = free water, NAWM = normal appearing white matter, WMH = white matter hyperintensity, AD = axial diffusivity, FA = fractional anisotropy, MD = mean diffusivity, RD = radial diffusivity; t = suffix for free water corrected tissue, nBV = normalized brain volume;
normalized and ln-transformed.
Fig. 1.Scatterplots and fit lines of FW in WMH (a) and in NAWM (b) (x-axis) and EF with a speed component (y-axis).
Partial correlation between imaging variables and EF with a speed component, adjusted for age.
| r | ||
|---|---|---|
| FW.NAWM | −0.141 | 0.036 |
| FW.WMH | −0.171 | 0.010 |
| MDt.NAWM | −0.058 | 0.385 |
| MDt.WMH | −0.213 | 0.001 |
| FAt.NAWM | 0.261 | <0.001 |
| FAt.WMH | −0.169 | 0.011 |
| ADt.NAWM | 0.266 | <0.001 |
| ADt.WMH | −0.199 | 0.003 |
| RDt.NAWM | −0.196 | 0.003 |
| RDt.WMH | 0.178 | 0.007 |
| WMH volume | −0.105 | 0.116 |
| brain volume (normalized) | 0.083 | 0.213 |
| lacunes[ | −2.020 | 0.045 |
Abbreviation: r = correlation coefficient, FW = free water, NAWM = normal appearing white matter, WMH = white matter hyperintensities, MD = mean diffusivity, FA = fractional anisotropy, AD = axial diffusivity, RD = radial diffusivity, t = suffix for free water corrected tissue,
exponentially transformed;
normalized and ln-transformed;
between group t-test (presented are T-score and p-value).
Fig. 2.Scatterplots showing an indirect relationship between two exemplarily chosen DTI measures in white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and cognitive functioning. The upper panel demonstrates the relationship between FW and the lower panel between MDt and results on EF with a speed component testing.
Fig. 3.Random forest regression analysis: Association between brain MRI measures and EF with a speed component. Free water in WMH and in NAWM were shown to have highest variable importance for EF with a speed component in a random forest regression. Abbreviations: FW = free water, WMH = white matter hyperintensities, NAWM = normal appearing white matter, tf = transformed, t = suffix for free water corrected tissue, AD = axial diffusivity, nBV = normalized brain volume, FA = fractional anisotropy, RD = radial diffusivity, WMHvol_norm_ln = normalized and log-transformed WMH volume, MD = mean diffusivity.
Significant linear regression results of EF with a speed component regressed on FW in specific white matter tracts. All analysis are corrected for age and the risk factors hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, BMI and smoking. Results are uncorrected for multiple comparisons.
| Variable |
| Std. error | beta |
| VIF |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| age | −0.034 | 0.004 | −0.51 | <0.001 | 1.533 | 0.017 | 0.421 |
| hypertension | −0.052 | 0.09 | −0.034 | 0.565 | 1.142 | ||
| diabetes | −0.19 | 0.133 | −0.081 | 0.154 | 1.051 | ||
| hypercholesterolemia | −0.161 | 0.097 | −0.093 | 0.098 | 1.044 | ||
| sex | −0.204 | 0.083 | −0.137 | 0.015 | 1.032 | ||
| BMI | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.058 | 0.326 | 1.137 | ||
| current smoker | −0.132 | 0.13 | −0.059 | 0.31 | 1.127 | ||
| fornix | −0.567 | 0.237 | −0.154 | 0.018 | 1.371 | ||
| age | −0.035 | 0.004 | −0.529 | <0.001 | 1.471 | 0.015 | 0.416 |
| hypertension | −0.023 | 0.089 | −0.015 | 0.794 | 1.149 | ||
| diabetes | −0.236 | 0.132 | −0.1 | 0.075 | 1.044 | ||
| hypercholesterolemia | −0.133 | 0.097 | −0.077 | 0.168 | 1.046 | ||
| sex | −0.169 | 0.083 | −0.114 | 0.043 | 1.05 | ||
| BMI | −0.006 | 0.01 | −0.037 | 0.526 | 1.137 | ||
| current smoker | −0.145 | 0.126 | −0.067 | 0.25 | 1.135 | ||
| corpus callosum body prefrontal | −2.973 | 1.329 | −0.141 | 0.026 | 1.327 | ||
| age | −0.035 | 0.004 | −0.538 | <0.001 | 1.374 | 0.016 | 0.418 |
| hypertension | −0.012 | 0.089 | −0.008 | 0.89 | 1.158 | ||
| diabetes | −0.25 | 0.132 | −0.106 | 0.06 | 1.049 | ||
| hypercholesterolemia | −0.152 | 0.096 | −0.088 | 0.115 | 1.042 | ||
| sex | −0.161 | 0.083 | −0.109 | 0.054 | 1.06 | ||
| BMI | −0.006 | 0.01 | −0.038 | 0.515 | 1.137 | ||
| current smoker | −0.157 | 0.125 | −0.073 | 0.21 | 1.125 | ||
| corpus callosum body premotor | −3.27 | 1.402 | −0.142 | 0.021 | 1.252 | ||
| age | −0.035 | 0.004 | −0.528 | <0.001 | 1.449 | 0.016 | 0.418 |
| hypertension | −0.025 | 0.089 | −0.016 | 0.778 | 1.148 | ||
| diabetes | −0.231 | 0.132 | −0.098 | 0.081 | 1.043 | ||
| hypercholesterolemia | −0.125 | 0.097 | −0.072 | 0.198 | 1.053 | ||
| sex | −0.17 | 0.083 | −0.114 | 0.042 | 1.048 | ||
| BMI | −0.005 | 0.01 | −0.03 | 0.612 | 1.138 | ||
| current smoker | −0.145 | 0.126 | −0.067 | 0.251 | 1.134 | ||
| corpus callosum genu | −2.996 | 1.286 | −0.146 | 0.021 | 1.321 |
Abbreviations: B = regression coefficient, Std. error = standard error, VIF = variance inflation factor, R change = variance explained by the specific tract.
Fig. 4.Random forest regression analysis.
Association between FW in specific white matter tracts and EF with a speed component. FW in the fornix and the corpus callosum (genu, prefrontal part of the body) showed highest variable importance for EF with a speed component.