Literature DB >> 35567674

Measurement properties and interpretability of the PROMIS item banks in stroke patients: a systematic review.

Daniëlla M Oosterveer1, Henk Arwert2,3, Caroline B Terwee4,5, Jan W Schoones6, Thea P M Vliet Vlieland2,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Both the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement and the National Institutes of Health recommend the use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures in clinical care and research for stroke patients. This study aimed to systematically review the literature on the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients.
METHODS: Nine databases were searched from January 1st, 2007 till April 12th, 2021 for studies concerning the measurement properties and interpretability of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. The findings of these studies were analyzed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs).
RESULTS: Ten studies were included. The PROMIS Global Health was studied the most: its two subscales had sufficient structural validity in one study of very good quality, sufficient construct validity with > 75% of hypotheses tested confirmed (high GRADE rating), sufficient internal consistency, i.e. α ≥ 0.70 in two studies (high GRADE rating), sufficient reliability, i.e. ICC ≥ 0.70 in one study of doubtful quality, and indeterminate responsiveness in one study of inadequate quality. For other PROMIS measures, the measurement properties and interpretability were limitedly studied.
CONCLUSION: The PROMIS Global Health showed sufficient structural and construct validity and internal consistency in stroke patients. There is a need for further research on content validity, structural validity, and measurement invariance of PROMIS measures in stroke patients. Trial Registration Information: CRD42020203044 (PROSPERO).
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Interpretability; Measurement properties; PROMIS; Patient-reported outcome measures; Psychometrics; Review; Stroke

Year:  2022        PMID: 35567674     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03149-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   3.440


  24 in total

1.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Caroline B Terwee; Donald L Patrick; Jordi Alonso; Paul W Stratford; Dirk L Knol; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) for Acute Stroke: Rationale, Methods and Future Directions.

Authors:  Mathew Reeves; Lynda Lisabeth; Linda Williams; Irene Katzan; Moira Kapral; Anne Deutsch; Janet Prvu-Bettger
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Clinical Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Domain Scales.

Authors:  Brittany Lapin; Nicolas R Thompson; Andrew Schuster; Irene L Katzan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-01

5.  COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  C A C Prinsen; L B Mokkink; L M Bouter; J Alonso; D L Patrick; H C W de Vet; C B Terwee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  L B Mokkink; H C W de Vet; C A C Prinsen; D L Patrick; J Alonso; L M Bouter; C B Terwee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years.

Authors:  David Cella; Susan Yount; Nan Rothrock; Richard Gershon; Karon Cook; Bryce Reeve; Deborah Ader; James F Fries; Bonnie Bruce; Mattias Rose
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument.

Authors:  Lidwine B Mokkink; Cecilia A C Prinsen; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  An International Standard Set of Patient-Centered Outcome Measures After Stroke.

Authors:  Joel Salinas; Sara M Sprinkhuizen; Teri Ackerson; Julie Bernhardt; Charlie Davie; Mary G George; Stephanie Gething; Adam G Kelly; Patrice Lindsay; Liping Liu; Sheila C O Martins; Louise Morgan; Bo Norrving; Gerard M Ribbers; Frank L Silver; Eric E Smith; Linda S Williams; Lee H Schwamm
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.

Authors:  C B Terwee; C A C Prinsen; A Chiarotto; M J Westerman; D L Patrick; J Alonso; L M Bouter; H C W de Vet; L B Mokkink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures in Clinical Research in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Henk J Arwert; Daniella M Oosterveer; Jan W Schoones; Caroline B Terwee; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2022-03-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.