| Literature DB >> 35567400 |
Eleonora Barilli1, Francisco J Agudo1, Marco Masi2, Paola Nocera2, Antonio Evidente2, Diego Rubiales1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Rusts and powdery mildews are severe fungal diseases of major crops worldwide, including cereals and legumes. They can be managed by chemical fungicide treatments, with negative consequences as environmental pollution and risk for human and animal health. Bioactive natural products could be the safest alternative for pest control. The family of anthraquinones, as well as analogue compounds containing an anthraquinone moiety or some modified anthraquinone rings, has been reported to exhibit certain antibiotic activity. Thus, the potential antifungal activity of some anthraquinones isolated from Ascochyta lentis, was assayed in this study for their effectiveness to reduce rust and powdery mildew diseases on pea and oat. Their effect on fungal development was macro- and microscopically assessed on inoculated leaves, and compared to the control achieved by the chemical fungicide (Tetraconazol 12.5% and Azoxystrobin 25%). In addition, the most promising compound was also tested at different concentrations in inoculated whole plants in order to evaluate its preventive and curative potential against fungal infection.Entities:
Keywords: anthraquinones; biocontrol; fungal metabolites; pachybasin; powdery mildew; rust
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35567400 PMCID: PMC9543780 DOI: 10.1002/ps.6989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pest Manag Sci ISSN: 1526-498X Impact factor: 4.462
Figure 1Structures of lentiquinones A–C, lentisone, ω‐hydroxypachybasin, phomarin and pachybasin (1–7).
Figure 2Susceptible pea (Pisum sativum) cv. Messire infected with Uromyces pisi (a) or with Erysiphe pisi (b); susceptible oat (Avena sativa) cv. Selma infected with Puccinia coronata f.sp. avenae (c) or with Blumeria graminis f.sp. avenae (d).
Physic data for anthraquinones, positive and negative control tested in pea and oat pathogens inhibition assays
| Compounds | MW |
|---|---|
| Lentiquinone A | 274.2 |
| Lentiquinone B | 292.3 |
| Lentiquinone C | 292.3 |
| Lentisone | 290.3 |
| ω‐Hydroxypachybasin | 254.2 |
| Phomarin | 254.2 |
| Untreated (control) | ‐ |
| Water (control) | ‐ |
| Water and MeOH 5% (control) | ‐ |
| Isagro® (Tetraconazol 12.5%) | ‐ |
| Mirador® (Azoxystrobin 25%) | ‐ |
Molecular weight.
A line has to be included in Table 1, between phomarin and untreated (control). In compounds coloumn you may put "pachybasin", and in MW column you should put 238.2.
Microscopical observations on the effect achieved by seven metabolites (at 1 mM) on rusts development stages at 24 hai*
| Pea – | Oat – | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | Microscopical data | Microscopical data | ||||||
| % Germination | % Appressoria | No of hypal tips/colony | No of haustoria/colony | % Germination | % Appressoria | No of hypal tips/colony | No of haustoria/colony | |
| Untreated | 79.1 ± 4.3 a | 54.9 ± 1.8 a | 3.6 ± 1.1 a | 1.8 ± 0.7 a | 79.4 ± 3.7 a | 53.6 ± 0.6 a | 3.5 ± 0.6 a | 1.9 ± 0.5 a |
| Water control | 78.9 ± 3.7 a | 52.5 ± 2.1 a | 3.5 ± 1.1 a | 1.8 ± 0.5 a | 79.0 ± 3.8 a | 52.8 ± 1.4 a | 3.3 ± 0.5 a | 1.7 ± 0.2 a |
| MeOH 5% control | 77.1 ± 3.4 a | 52.7 ± 2.8 a | 3.2 ± 1 ab | 1.7 ± 0.8 a | 78.0 ± 4.3 a | 53.4 ± 1.2 a | 3.4 ± 0.9 a | 1.8 ± 0.9 a |
| Lentiquinone A 1 mM | 39.3 ± 0.5 b | 16.7 ± 1.5 b | 2.9 ± 0.8 bc | 1.6 ± 0.9 ab | 28.4 ± 3.1 b | 11.8 ± 0.5 b | 2.6 ± 0.6 ab | 1.3 ± 0.5 ab |
| Lentiquinone B 1 mM | 52.0 ± 4.3 ab | 19.4 ± 1.2 b | 3.1 ± 1 ab | 1.3 ± 0.4 bc | 31.2 ± 5.9 b | 2.5 ± 0.3 d | 2.6 ± 0.4 ab | 1.4 ± 0.4 ab |
| Lentiquinone C 1 mM | 6.4 ± 2.1 bc | 2.7 ± 0.9 de | 1.2 ± 0.5 d | 0.5 ± 0.4 d | 1.9 ± 1.1 d | 0.1 ± 0.03 fg | 0.8 ± 0.2 b | 0.3 ± 0.15c |
| Lentisone 1 mM | 23.2 ± 3.6 b | 14.8 ± 0.8 bc | 3.5 ± 0.6 a | 1.9 ± 0.8 a | 28.7 ± 2.9 b | 2.3 ± 0.3 d | 3.2 ± 0.7 a | 1.6 ± 0.5 a |
| ω‐Hydroxypachybasin 1 mM | 35.5 ± 2.7 b | 14.0 ± 1.0 bc | 2.2 ± 0.4 c | 1.2 ± 0.6 c | 29.2 ± 2.8 b | 7.0 ± 0.9 c | 1.4 ± 0.4 b | 1.2 ± 0.2 b |
| Phomarin 1 mM | 46.0 ± 1.6 b | 13.6 ± 0.7 c | 2.9 ± 1.0 bc | 1.3 ± 0.5 bc | 22.4 ± 1.0 b | 1.2 ± 0.3 e | 3.0 ± 0.4 a | 1.4 ± 0.6 ab |
| Pachybasin 1 mM | 3.4 ± 1.1 c | 0.4 ± 0.5 e | 0 ± 0 e | 0 ± 0 e | 2.7 ± 0.2 e | 0.3 ± 0.2 fg | 0 ± 0 c | 0 ± 0 d |
| Fungicide Azoxystrobin 25% | 1.5 ± 0.4 d | 0.4 ± 0.4 e | 0 ± 0 e | 0 ± 0 e | 0.6 ± 0.2 e | 0 ± 0 g | 0 ± 0 c | 0 ± 0 d |
Experiments were performed on susceptible pea and oat genotypes.
Values, per column and treatment, followed by different letters differ significantly at P < 0.01.
Hours after inoculation.
Figure 3Disease severity (%) of pea and oat rusts (black and grey columns, respectively) (a) and pea and oat powdery mildews (black and grey columns, respectively) (b) in cut leave assays on negative (untreated, water and MeOH 5%) controls, treated leaves with metabolites and positive controls (fungicide). The compounds were tested at a concentration of 1 mM. The experiment was repeated four times. For each metabolite, the asterisk indicates that differences on fungal development due to the metabolite tested compared to the negative controls were significant (P < 0.01).
Microscopical observations on the effect achieved by seven metabolites (at 1 mM) on powdery mildew development stages at 24 hai*
| Pea – | Oat – | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | Microscopical data | Microscopical data | ||||||
| % Germination | % Appressoria | No of hypal tips/colony | No of haustoria/colony | % Germination | % Appressoria | No of hypal tips/colony | No of haustoria/colony | |
| Untreated | 77.6 ± 5 a | 52.1 ± 3.7 a | 11.2 ± 3.8 a | 4.8 ± 1.8 a | 72.8 ± 5.3 a | 45.4 ± 4.3 a | 6.9 ± 1.9 a | 3.4 ± 0.9 a |
| Water control | 75.8 ± 3.6 a | 51.2 ± 4.3 a | 10.4 ± 2.9 a | 4.5 ± 1.3 a | 70.2 ± 4.6 a | 44.9 ± 4.6 a | 6.3 ± 1.7 a | 3.1 ± 0.7 a |
| MeOH 5% control | 75.5 ± 3.7 a | 51.7 ± 3.6 a | 10.4 ± 2.6 a | 4.3 ± 1.6 a | 69.2 ± 4.7 a | 44.3 ± 4.3 a | 6.4 ± 1.4 a | 3.1 ± 0.7 a |
| Lentiquinone A 1 mM | 40.6 ± 2.9 bc | 45.1 ± 2.9 b | 2.3 ± 2.0 c | 1.6 ± 0.9 b | 43.0 ± 6.8 b | 44.9 ± 4.1 a | 3.8 ± 1.5 b | 1.2 ± 0.8 bc |
| Lentiquinone B 1 mM | 41.0 ± 5.0 bc | 44.9 ± 3.9 b | 3.7 ± 1.4 b | 1.4 ± 0.8 b | 31.8 ± 3.6 c | 33.1 ± 2.9 b | 3.1 ± 0.4 bc | 1.5 ± 0.6 b |
| Lentiquinone C 1 mM | 38.3 ± 1.7 c | 5.8 ± 2.9 e | 1.8 ± 1.2 c | 0.4 ± 0.3 c | 8.9 ± 3.1 d | 11.0 ± 1.6 de | 3.8 ± 1.3 b | 0.7 ± 0.4 c |
| Lentisone 1 mM | 46.7 ± 2.6 b | 16.9 ± 4.1 d | 4.4 ± 1.6 b | 2.2 ± 0.8 ab | 45.2 ± 2.8 b | 23 ± 4.8 c | 3.6 ± 1.2 b | 1.7 ± 0.6 b |
| ω‐Hydroxypachybasin 1 mM | 45.9 ± 2.9 b | 46.9 ± 2.9 b | 3.7 ± 1.5 b | 0.6 ± 0.4 bc | 38.8 ± 2.4 bc | 31.4 ± 3.0 b | 2.2 ± 0.8 c | 0.5 ± 0.4 cd |
| Phomarin 1 mM | 40.8 ± 4.9 bc | 33.7 ± 2.6 c | 3.1 ± 1.4 bc | 1.4 ± 0.7 b | 40.9 ± 4.2 bc | 31.1 ± 5.5 b | 3.6 ± 1.0 b | 1.5 ± 0.6 b |
| Pachybasin 1 mM | 5.8 ± 1.6 d | 7.05 ± 1.9 e | 1.4 ± 0.7 cd | 0.3 ± 0.2 c | 4.6 ± 2 d | 7.5 ± 2.1 e | 1.7 ± 0.8 cd | 0.3 ± 0.2 d |
| Fungicide Tetraconazol 12.5% | 1.6 ± 0.8 e | 0.5 ± 0.2 f | 1.3 ± 0.6 d | 0.3 ± 0.2 c | 0.9 ± 0.3 e | 0.8 ± 0.5f | 1.4 ± 0.7 d | 0.25 ± 0.2 d |
Experiments were performed on susceptible pea and oat genotypes.
Values, per column and treatment, followed by different letters differ significantly at P < 0.01.
Hours after inoculation.
Macroscopical observations: infection type (IT) and final disease severity (DS%) of rust on plant of oat cv. Selma inoculated with Puccinia coronata f.sp. avenae and of pea cv. Messire inoculated with Uromyces pisi mM
| Oat – | Pea – | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | 2 DBI | 0 DBI | 2 DAI | 2 DBI | 0 DBI | 2 DAI | ||||||
| IT | DS% | IT | DS% | IT | DS% | IT | DS% | IT | DS% | IT | DS% | |
| Untreated | 4 | 85.0 ± 2.0 a | 4 | 90.0 ± 2.0 a | 4 | 87.2 ± 1.6 a | 4 | 75.5 ± 1.5 a | 4 | 75.3 ± 1.2 a | 4 | 78.0 ± 1.4 a |
| Water control | 4 | 80.3 ± 3.2 a | 4 | 87.8 ± 2.3 a | 4 | 86.8 ± 3.1 a | 4 | 73.0 ± 1.3 a | 4 | 73.2 ± 1.2 a | 4 | 78.3 ± 1.1 a |
| MeOH 5% control | 4 | 80.4 ± 3.0 a | 4 | 84.4 ± 3.1 a | 4 | 88.3 ± 3.4 a | 4 | 70.9 ± 1.2 a | 4 | 74.9 ± 1.2 a | 4 | 76.1 ± 1.9 a |
| Pachybasin 1 mM | 4 | 27.2 ± 4.6 b | 4 | 8.3 ± 2.6 b | 4 | 50.5 ± 5.4 b | 4 | 24.3 ± 2.0 b | 4 | 13.1 ± 1.7 b | 4 | 43.8 ± 1.3 b |
| Pachybasin 2 mM | 4 | 20.7 ± 3.9 b | 4 | 3.4 ± 2.1 c | 4 | 44.4 ± 3.4 b | 4 | 22.4 ± 1.7 c | 4 | 2.5 ± 0.8 c | 4 | 39.4 ± 1.6 c |
| Fungicide Azoxystrobin 25% | 0 | 0 ± 0 c | 0 | 0 ± 0 d | 0 | 0 ± 0 c | 0 | 0 ± 0 c | 0 | 0 ± 0 d | 0 | 0 ± 0 c |
DS% was assessed on whole planta 10 DAI.* Pachybasin selected metabolite, negative (untreated, water and MeOH 5%) and positive (Azoxystrobin 25% fungicide) controls were applied to plants at different times to fungal inoculation: 2 DBI, 0 DBI and 2 DAI. Pachybasin was tested at a concentration of 1 and 2.
Values, per column and treatment, followed by different letters differ significantly at P < 0.01.
Days after inoculation.
Days before inoculation.
Figure 4Disease severity (%) measured on rust‐inoculated whole plants of oat (a) and pea (b) at 10 days after inoculation, and on powdery mildew‐inoculated whole plants of oat (c) and pea (d) at 7 days after inoculation. Plants were treated at different time points (2 days before inoculation (2 DBI), the same day of fungal inoculation (0 DBI) and 2 days after inoculation (2 DAI)) with pachybasin at two different concentrations (1 and 2 mM), and were compared with positive controls (fungicides) and negative controls (untreated, water and MeOH 5%).
Macroscopical observations: infection type (IT) and final disease severity (DS%) of powdery mildew on plants of pea cv. Messire and oat cv. Selma inoculated with Erysiphe pisi and Blumeria graminis f.sp. avenae, respectively
| Oat – | Pea – | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | 2 DBI | 0 DBI | 2 DAI | 2 DBI | 0 DBI | 2 DAI | ||||||
| IT | DS% | IT | DS% | IT | DS% | IT | DS% | IT | DS% | IT | DS% | |
| Untreated | 4 | 80.0 ± 2.2 a | 4 | 84.3 ± 2.9 a | 4 | 87.2 ± 1.28 a | 4 | 77.6 a ± 3.5 a | 4 | 75.3 ± 2.8 a | 4 | 78.8 ± 2.4 a |
| Water control | 4 | 83.5 ± 4.0 a | 4 | 82.7 ± 2.7 a | 4 | 80.7 ± 5.8 a | 4 | 81.7 ± 2.1 a | 4 | 77.8 ± 1.9 a | 4 | 81.0 ± 1.5 a |
| MeOH 5% control | 4 | 83.6 ± 4.2 a | 4 | 79.7 ± 3.1 a | 4 | 86.1 ± 5.5 a | 4 | 81.8 ± 2.4 a | 4 | 78.3 ± 1.5 a | 4 | 82.2 ± 1.5 a |
| Pachybasin 1 mM | 4 | 12.1 ± 2.5 b | 4 | 6.6 ± 6.5 b | 4 | 9.4 ± 1.8 b | 4 | 16.5 ± 2.8 b | 4 | 2.0 ± 0.9 b | 4 | 6.9 ± 2.8 b |
| Pachybasin 2 mM | 4 | 9.0 ± 3.0 b | 4 | 0 ± 0 c | 4 | 1.0 ± 0.6 c | 4 | 13.8 ± 2.6 b | 4 | 1.4 ± 1.0 bc | 4 | 3.9 ± 1.8 b |
| Fungicide Tetraconazol 12.5% | 0 | 0 ± 0 c | 0 | 0 ± 0 c | 0 | 0 ± 0 c | 0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 c | 0 | 0 ± 0 c | 0 | 0.6 ± 0.2 c |
DS% was recorded on whole plants 7 DAI.* Pachybasin selected metabolite, negative (untreated, water and MeOH 5%) and positive (Tetraconazole 12.5% fungicide) controls were applied to plants at different times to fungal inoculation: 2 DBI, 0 DBI and 2 DAI. Pachybasin was tested at a concentration of 1 and 2 mM.
Values, per column and treatment, followed by different letters differ significantly at P < 0.01.
Days after inoculation.
Days before inoculation.