Literature DB >> 35567153

Marker-Assisted Improvement of Bread Wheat Variety HD2967 for Leaf and Stripe Rust Resistance.

Niharika Mallick1, Shailendra K Jha1, Priyanka Agarwal1, Anchal Mall1,2, Niranjana M1, Sachin Kumar1, Manish K Choudhary1, Shreshtha Bansal1, M S Saharan3, J B Sharma1.   

Abstract

The mega wheat variety HD2967 was improved for leaf and stripe rust resistance by marker-assisted backcross breeding. After its release in 2011, HD2967 became susceptible to stripe rust and moderately susceptible to leaf rust. The leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk was transferred into HD2967 from the durum wheat genotype Trinakria. Then, HD2967 was crossed with Trinakria to produce F1 plant foreground selection for LrTrk and background selection for the recurrent parent genotype was carried out in BC1F1, BC2F1 and BC2F2 generations. Foreground selection was carried out with the linked marker Xgwm234, while polymorphic SSR markers between parents were used for background selection. Background selection resulted in the rapid recovery of the recurrent parent genome. A morphological evaluation of 6 near isogenic lines (NILs)-2 resistant to leaf and stripe rust, and 4 resistant to leaf rust only-showed no significant differences in yields among NILs and the recurrent parent HD2967. All of the 6 NILs showed the presence of 2NS/2AS translocation, carrying the linked genes Lr37/Sr38/Yr17 present in HD2967 and the targeted leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk. Two NILs also showed additional resistance to stripe rust. Therefore, these NILs with rust resistance and an at par yielding ability of H2967 can replace the susceptible cultivar HD2967 to reduce yield losses due to disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  backcross breeding; leaf rust; marker-assisted selection; near isogenic line; stripe rust; wheat

Year:  2022        PMID: 35567153      PMCID: PMC9103291          DOI: 10.3390/plants11091152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plants (Basel)        ISSN: 2223-7747


1. Introduction

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of the major food crops of the world, accounting for 20% of the calories consumed by humans globally [1]. The production of wheat is affected by several biotic and abiotic factors. Among the biotic factors, rust diseases caused by Puccinia spp. inflict significant damage to the crop of susceptible cultivars, resulting in substantial yield losses [2,3]. There are three rust diseases: viz. leaf rust (Puccinia triticina Eriks.); stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. Tritici); and stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis), which infecting wheat under different agro-ecological conditions. Wheat growing areas are differentially suited to the development of leaf, stem, and stripe rust [4]. The leaf rust pathogen has a wide range of adaptation to different environments; and, it therefore occurs in all wheat growing areas, causing significant yield losses in susceptible cultivars globally [5,6,7]. Stripe rust is a devastating disease affecting wheat worldwide, especially under cool and moist conditions [8,9]. Stem rust develops under relatively warmer conditions [10,11] and it can cause substantial yield losses, especially under epidemic conditions [12,13,14]. In India, among all the three rusts, leaf rust is the most widespread and prevails in all the wheat-growing zones, while stripe rust occurs predominantly in the cooler areas of the north–western plains and northern hill states in the Himalayas. Stem rust is a disease of warmer areas and occurs mainly in central and peninsular India. Although fungicides can control rust diseases, developing rust-resistant cultivars is an environment friendly and economical method of disease control [15,16]. The evolution of new and virulent pathotypes of the rust pathogen renders the existing cultivars susceptible. There is a need for the identification of new and effective sources of resistance and their utilization in breeding programs [17,18,19]. There is a continuous need for developing new cultivars with effective resistance genes to replace the susceptible cultivars. With developments in molecular genetics and genomics, marker-assisted breeding has emerged as a major tool in varietal development. Marker-assisted backcross breeding provides a precise method to transfer rust resistant genes in an agronomically well-adapted cultivar that has become susceptible due to the evolution of new virulent pathotypes [20,21,22,23]. Two wheat varieties—Unnat PBW343 and Unnat PBW550—were developed using marker-assisted backcross breeding [24,25] and they were released for cultivation in 2017 to replace the popular but susceptible wheat varieties of India PBW343 and PBW550, respectively. These varieties are giving higher returns to farmers [26]. Developed at the Indian Agricultural Research Institute in New Delhi, wheat variety ICAR-HD2967 is a mega variety released for general cultivation in India’s North Western Plain Zone under timely sown irrigated conditions in 2011 [27]. Variety HD2967 soon became popular and occupied more than 10 million hectares [28]. Due to its adaptability and its high yield, HD2967 was also recommended for cultivation in the North Eastern Plain Zone. However, over a period of time, HD2967 became susceptible to stripe rust and it showed moderate susceptibility to leaf rust. Both stripe rust and leaf rust are important diseases of the NWPZ (North Western Plain Zone) as well as the NEPZ (North Eastern Plain Zone) due to conducive environmental conditions during the crop season. Due to its yield advantage and its adaptability, HD2967 remains popular among farmers; therefore, the transfer of leaf and stripe rust resistance genes to HD2967 can protect farmers from yield losses and reduce spending on fungicides. Durum wheat genotype Trinakria showed leaf and stem rust resistance under field conditions [29]. Trinakria also showed a high degree of stripe rust resistance at the seedling and the adult plant stages. In the present study, Trinakria was used as a donor for leaf and stripe rust resistance in an effort to improve leaf and stripe rust resistance in HD2967.

2. Results

2.1. Development of NILs Carrying Leaf Rust Resistance Gene LrTrk and Leaf and Stripe Rust Resistance Gene LrTrk/YrTrk

Crosses were made between the recurrent parent (RP) HD2967 and the donor parent (DP) Trinakria (Tetraploid donor) to produce the F1 generation. The co-dominant SSR marker Xgwm234 was linked with the leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk to confirm the heterozygosity of F1 plants. Five true F1 plants were backcrossed with HD2967 to produce the BC1F1 generation. The BC1F1 seeds were found to be a mixture of normal-filled and shriveled seeds. A total of 145 normal-filled BC1F1 seeds were sown; out of that, 60 plants were found to carry LrTrk in the heterozygous state when screened with the Xgwm234 marker (Table 1). Out of the 60 BC1F1 plants, 10 plants that looked phenotypically similar to HD2967 were selected for marker-assisted background analysis. A parental polymorphism survey between HD2967 and Trinakria with 700 SSR markers (Table A1) identified 83 polymorphic markers (Table A2). A background analysis with polymorphic SSR markers of 10 phenotypically selected BC1F1 plants showed that RPG recovery varied from 78.91% to 83.13% (Table 1). The plant carrying maximum RPG recovery of 83.13% was backcrossed with HD2967 to produce the BC2F1 generation. As compared to the BC1F1 generation, BC2F1 seeds were found to be normal and well-filled. A total of 66 BC2F1 plants were screened for the leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk with the linked SSR marker Xgwm234. Thirty-nine plants were identified as carrying LrTrk in heterozygous conditions (Table 1). Again, ten plants that looked phenotypically similar to HD2967 were selected for background analysis using SSR markers. In the ten selected plants in the BC2F1 generation, RPG recovery varied from 90.36% to 93.37% (Table 1). The plant with a maximum RPG recovery of 93.37% was selfed to produce the BC2F2 generation. Foreground selection among 200 BC2F2 plants was undertaken that identified 98 and 61 plants carrying the leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk (a 269 bp band) in heterozygous and homozygous states, respectively (Figure 1; Table 1). A background analysis revealed that RPG recovery in 61 BC2F2 plants homozygous for LrTrk ranged from 95.18% to 98.79%. Thirty-two homozygous BC2F2 plants with RPG recovery above 97% were selfed to produce BC2F3 families (Table 1).
Table 1

Number of gene-positive plants identified in each backcross generation and their background recovery.

Recipient ParentTarget GeneGenerationNo. of Plants Screened with Linked Molecular MarkerNo. of Plants Carrying Target GeneNo. of Plants Selected for Background SelectionNumber of Plants Backcrossed/Selfed/SelectedRecurrent Parent Genome (RPG) Recovery (%)
HeterozygousHomozygous
HD2967 LrTrk BC1F114560-10178.91–83.13
BC2F16639-10190.36–93.37
BC2F22009861613295.18–98.79
Table A1

List of 700 markers used in parental polymorphism survey.

S.No.MarkerS.No.MarkerS.No.MarkerS.No.MarkerS.No.Marker
1 Xbarc10 48 Xbarc20 95 Xbarc95 142 Xcfd13 189 Xcfd88
2 Xbarc101 49 Xbarc200 96 Xbarc98 143 Xcfd143 190 Xgdm101
3 Xbarc108 50 Xbarc206 97 Xcfa2019 144 Xcfd15 191 Xgdm109
4 Xbarc109 51 Xbarc21 98 Xcfa2026 145 Xcfd156 192 Xgdm113
5 Xbarc117 52 Xbarc212 99 Xcfa2028 146 Xcfd16 193 Xgdm116
6 Xbarc119 53 Xbarc229 100 Xcfa2037 147 Xcfd168 194 Xgdm136
7 Xbarc121 54 Xbarc23 101 Xcfa2040 148 Xcfd170 195 Xgdm14
8 Xbarc123 55 Xbarc232 102 Xcfa2043 149 Xcfd190 196 Xgdm146
9 Xbarc124 56 Xbarc24 103 Xcfa2056 150 Xcfd193 197 Xgdm28
10 Xbarc127 57 Xbarc240 104 Xcfa2070 151 Xcfd2 198 Xgdm33
11 Xbarc128 58 Xbarc25 105 Xcfa2076 152 Xcfd2.1 199 Xgdm36
12 Xbarc13 59 Xbarc267 106 Xcfa2091 153 Xcfd2.2 200 Xgdm63
13 Xbarc134 60 Xbarc28 107 Xcfa2104 154 Xcfd20 201 Xgpw2246
14 Xbarc137 61 Xbarc3 108 Xcfa2106 155 Xcfd219 202 Xgpw3010
15 Xbarc138 62 Xbarc32 109 Xcfa2110 156 Xcfd22 203 Xgpw3069
16 Xbarc140 63 Xbarc37 110 Xcfa2114 157 Xcfd24 204 Xgpw3261
17 Xbarc141 64 Xbarc4 111 Xcfa2121 158 Xcfd242 205 Xgpw5193
18 Xbarc142 65 Xbarc40 112 Xcfa2123 159 Xcfd25 206 Xgpw7052
19 Xbarc145 66 Xbarc417 113 Xcfa2129 160 Xcfd251 207 Xgpw7070
20 Xbarc146 67 Xbarc45 114 Xcfa2134 161 Xcfd257 208 Xgpw7072
21 Xbarc147 68 Xbarc48 115 Xcfa2141 162 Xcfd267 209 Xgwm10
22 Xbarc148 69 Xbarc49 116 Xcfa2147 163 Xcfd28 210 Xgwm107
23 Xbarc151 70 Xbarc5 117 Xcfa2149 164 Xcfd283 211 Xgwm108
24 Xbarc154 71 Xbarc55 118 Xcfa2155 165 Xcfd30 212 Xgwm11
25 Xbarc158 72 Xbarc56 119 Xcfa2163 166 Xcfd31 213 Xgwm112
26 Xbarc159 73 Xbarc59 120 Xcfa2164 167 Xcfd36 214 Xgwm113
27 Xbarc163 74 Xbarc60 121 Xcfa2170 168 Xcfd39 215 Xgwm114
28 Xbarc164 75 Xbarc67 122 Xcfa2174 169 Xcfd4 216 Xgwm120
29 Xbarc165 76 Xbarc68 123 Xcfa2179 170 Xcfd48 217 Xgwm122
30 Xbarc167 77 Xbarc69 124 Xcfa2183 171 Xcfd5 218 Xgwm124
31 Xbarc17 78 Xbarc7 125 Xcfa2185 172 Xcfd50 219 Xgwm126
32 Xbarc170 79 Xbarc72 126 Xcfa2187 173 Xcfd54 220 Xgwm129
33 Xbarc173 80 Xbarc73 127 Xcfa2190 174 Xcfd59 221 Xgwm130
34 Xbarc174 81 Xbarc75 128 Xcfa2191 175 Xcfd6 222 Xgwm131
35 Xbarc176 82 Xbarc76 129 Xcfa2193 176 Xcfd60 223 Xgwm132
36 Xbarc178 83 Xbarc77 130 Xcfa2219 177 Xcfd62 224 Xgwm133
37 Xbarc18 84 Xbarc78 131 Xcfa2226 178 Xcfd65 225 Xgwm135
38 Xbarc180 85 Xbarc8 132 Xcfa2234 179 Xcfd7 226 Xgwm136
39 Xbarc181 86 Xbarc80 133 Xcfa2240 180 Xcfd70 227 Xgwm140
40 Xbarc182 87 Xbarc81 134 Xcfa2250 181 Xcfd71 228 Xgwm146
41 Xbarc183 88 Xbarc83 135 Xcfa2256 182 Xcfd73 229 Xgwm148
42 Xbarc186 89 Xbarc84 136 Xcfa2257 183 Xcfd74 230 Xgwm149
43 Xbarc187 90 Xbarc85 137 Xcfa2262 184 Xcfd79 231 Xgwm153
44 Xbarc188 91 Xbarc87 138 Xcfa2278 185 Xcfd80 232 Xgwm154
45 Xbarc195 92 Xbarc89 139 Xcfa2293 186 Xcfd81 233 Xgwm155
46 Xbarc197 93 Xbarc92 140 Xcfd1 187 Xcfd82 234 Xgwm156
47 Xbarc198 94 Xbarc94 141 Xcfd11 188 Xcfd86 235 Xgwm159
236 Xgwm16 284 Xgwm312 332 Xgwm471 380 Xgwm636 428 Xwmc166
237 Xgwm160 285 Xgwm314 333 Xgwm473 381 Xgwm637 429 Xwmc168
238 Xgwm162 286 Xgwm319 334 Xgwm480 382 Xgwm639 430 Xwmc169
239 Xgwm164 287 Xgwm32 335 Xgwm493 383 Xgwm644 431 Xwmc17
240 Xgwm165 288 Xgwm328 336 Xgwm494 384 Xgwm66 432 Xwmc173
241 Xgwm169 289 Xgwm33 337 Xgwm495 385 Xgwm664 433 Xwmc175
242 Xgwm179 290 Xgwm332 338 Xgwm497 386 Xgwm666 434 Xwmc177
243 Xgwm18 291 Xgwm333 339 Xgwm498 387 Xgwm666.1 435 Xwmc179
244 Xgwm181 292 Xgwm334 340 Xgwm499 388 Xgwm666.2 436 Xwmc181
245 Xgwm182 293 Xgwm335 341 Xgwm5 389 Xgwm67 437 Xwmc182
246 Xgwm186 294 Xgwm339 342 Xgwm501 390 Xgwm674 438 Xwmc183
247 Xgwm191 295 Xgwm340 343 Xgwm508 391 Xgwm68 439 Xwmc201
248 Xgwm192 296 Xgwm344 344 Xgwm512 392 Xgwm70 440 Xwmc206
249 Xgwm193 297 Xgwm350 345 Xgwm513 393 Xgwm72 441 Xwmc213
250 Xgwm2 298 Xgwm356 346 Xgwm515 394 Xgwm77 442 Xwmc215
251 Xgwm205 299 Xgwm357 347 Xgwm518 395 Xgwm88 443 Xwmc216
252 Xgwm210 300 Xgwm359 348 Xgwm526 396 Xgwm88.1 444 Xwmc218
253 Xgwm213 301 Xgwm361 349 Xgwm537 397 Xgwm88.2 445 Xwmc219
254 Xgwm219 302 Xgwm368 350 Xgwm538 398 Xgwm95 446 Xwmc230
255 Xgwm233 303 Xgwm369 351 Xgwm540 399 Xgwm99 447 Xwmc231
256 Xgwm234 304 Xgwm371 352 Xgwm544 400 Xwmc1 448 Xwmc232
257 Xgwm247 305 Xgwm372 353 Xgwm547 401 Xwmc10 449 Xwmc235
258 Xgwm249 306 Xgwm374 354 Xgwm55 402 Xwmc104 450 Xwmc238
259 Xgwm251 307 Xgwm375 355 Xgwm550 403 Xwmc105 451 Xwmc24
260 Xgwm257 308 Xgwm376 356 Xgwm554 404 Xwmc109 452 Xwmc243
261 Xgwm259 309 Xgwm382 357 Xgwm558 405 Xwmc11 453 Xwmc245
262 Xgwm260 310 Xgwm388 358 Xgwm565 406 Xwmc110 454 Xwmc247
263 Xgwm264 311 Xgwm389 359 Xgwm566 407 Xwmc113 455 Xwmc25
264 Xgwm265 312 Xgwm391 360 Xgwm569 408 Xwmc116 456 Xwmc254
265 Xgwm268 313 Xgwm397 361 Xgwm570 409 Xwmc118 457 Xwmc256
266 Xgwm271 314 Xgwm4 362 Xgwm573 410 Xwmc120 458 Xwmc257
267 Xgwm273 315 Xgwm400 363 Xgwm577 411 Xwmc125 459 Xwmc258
268 Xgwm274 316 Xgwm403 364 Xgwm582 412 Xwmc128 460 Xwmc261
269 Xgwm275 317 Xgwm408 365 Xgwm595 413 Xwmc134 461 Xwmc262
270 Xgwm276 318 Xgwm410 366 Xgwm6 414 Xwmc139 462 Xwmc264
271 Xgwm282 319 Xgwm413 367 Xgwm60 415 Xwmc145 463 Xwmc265
272 Xgwm284 320 Xgwm415 368 Xgwm601 416 Xwmc149 464 Xwmc269
273 Xgwm285 321 Xgwm425 369 Xgwm604 417 Xwmc15 465 Xwmc27
274 Xgwm291 322 Xgwm427 370 Xgwm608 418 Xwmc150 466 Xwmc272
275 Xgwm293 323 Xgwm429 371 Xgwm610 419 Xwmc152 467 Xwmc273
276 Xgwm294 324 Xgwm43 372 Xgwm611 420 Xwmc153 468 Xwmc274
277 Xgwm296 325 Xgwm44 373 Xgwm613 421 Xwmc154 469 Xwmc276
278 Xgwm297 326 Xgwm443 374 Xgwm614 422 Xwmc156 470 Xwmc278
279 Xgwm299 327 Xgwm445 375 Xgwm617 423 Xwmc158 471 Xwmc28
280 Xgwm30 328 Xgwm448 376 Xgwm626 424 Xwmc16 472 Xwmc283
281 Xgwm302 329 Xgwm459 377 Xgwm63 425 Xwmc160 473 Xwmc289
282 Xgwm304 330 Xgwm46 378 Xgwm630 426 Xwmc161 474 Xwmc291
283 Xgwm311 331 Xgwm47 379 Xgwm635 427 Xwmc163 475 Xwmc296
476 Xwmc307 524 Xwmc453 572 Xwmc580 620 Xwmc679 668 Xwmc776
477 Xwmc31 525 Xwmc455 573 Xwmc581 621 Xwmc680 669 Xwmc777
478 Xwmc310 526 Xwmc468 574 Xwmc59 622 Xwmc682 670 Xwmc78
479 Xwmc311 527 Xwmc469 575 Xwmc592 623 Xwmc684 671 Xwmc783
480 Xwmc312 528 Xwmc47 576 Xwmc593 624 Xwmc687 672 Xwmc786
481 Xwmc313 529 Xwmc471 577 Xwmc594 625 Xwmc692 673 Xwmc787
482 Xwmc317 530 Xwmc473 578 Xwmc596 626 Xwmc693 674 Xwmc79
483 Xwmc323 531 Xwmc474 579 Xwmc597 627 Xwmc694 675 Xwmc790
484 Xwmc326 532 Xwmc475 580 Xwmc598 628 Xwmc695 676 Xwmc792
485 Xwmc329 533 Xwmc476 581 Xwmc602 629 Xwmc696 677 Xwmc794
486 Xwmc332 534 Xwmc477 582 Xwmc603 630 Xwmc698 678 Xwmc795
487 Xwmc335 535 Xwmc479 583 Xwmc606 631 Xwmc70 679 Xwmc798
488 Xwmc336 536 Xwmc48 584 Xwmc607 632 Xwmc702 680 Xwmc805
489 Xwmc344 537 Xwmc486 585 Xwmc611 633 Xwmc705 681 Xwmc807
490 Xwmc349 538 Xwmc487 586 Xwmc612 634 Xwmc707 682 Xwmc808
491 Xwmc35 539 Xwmc488 587 Xwmc613 635 Xwmc710 683 Xwmc809
492 Xwmc356 540 Xwmc489 588 Xwmc615 636 Xwmc713 684 Xwmc810
493 Xwmc361 541 Xwmc49 589 Xwmc616 637 Xwmc716 685 Xwmc813
494 Xwmc364 542 Xwmc491 590 Xwmc617 638 Xwmc718 686 Xwmc815
495 Xwmc366 543 Xwmc492 591 Xwmc619 639 Xwmc719 687 Xwmc817
496 Xwmc376 544 Xwmc494 592 Xwmc623 640 Xwmc722 688 Xwmc818
497 Xwmc382 545 Xwmc497 593 Xwmc625 641 Xwmc723 689 Xwmc819
498 Xwmc386 546 Xwmc498 594 Xwmc626 642 Xwmc726 690 Xwmc826
499 Xwmc388 547 Xwmc500 595 Xwmc627 643 Xwmc727 691 Xwmc827
500 Xwmc396 548 Xwmc505 596 Xwmc63 644 Xwmc728 692 Xwmc83
501 Xwmc397 549 Xwmc508 597 Xwmc630 645 Xwmc73 693 Xwmc830
502 Xwmc398 550 Xwmc51 598 Xwmc631 646 Xwmc734 694 Xwmc85
503 Xwmc405 551 Xwmc511 599 Xwmc632 647 Xwmc737 695 Xwmc89
504 Xwmc406 552 Xwmc513 600 Xwmc633 648 Xwmc740 696 Xwmc9
505 Xwmc407 553 Xwmc516 601 Xwmc640 649 Xwmc744 697 Xwmc93
506 Xwmc413 554 Xwmc517 602 Xwmc644 650 Xwmc745 698 Xwmc95
507 Xwmc415 555 Xwmc52 603 Xwmc646 651 Xwmc748 699 Xwmc96
508 Xwmc416 556 Xwmc522 604 Xwmc65 652 Xwmc75 700 Xwmc99
509 Xwmc417 557 Xwmc524 605 Xwmc650 653 Xwmc751
510 Xwmc418 558 Xwmc525 606 Xwmc651 654 Xwmc752
511 Xwmc419 559 Xwmc526 607 Xwmc652 655 Xwmc753
512 Xwmc420 560 Xwmc527 608 Xwmc653 656 Xwmc754
513 Xwmc422 561 Xwmc532 609 Xwmc654 657 Xwmc756
514 Xwmc426 562 Xwmc533 610 Xwmc657 658 Xwmc757
515 Xwmc428 563 Xwmc537 611 Xwmc658 659 Xwmc758
516 Xwmc43 564 Xwmc539 612 Xwmc661 660 Xwmc759
517 Xwmc430 565 Xwmc540 613 Xwmc662 661 Xwmc76
518 Xwmc434 566 Xwmc544 614 Xwmc664 662 Xwmc760
519 Xwmc435 567 Xwmc546 615 Xwmc667 663 Xwmc762
520 Xwmc44 568 Xwmc553 616 Xwmc672 664 Xwmc764
521 Xwmc441 569 Xwmc557 617 Xwmc673 665 Xwmc766
522 Xwmc445 570 Xwmc559 618 Xwmc674 666 Xwmc770
523 Xwmc446 571 Xwmc577 619 Xwmc675 667 Xwmc773
Table A2

List of polymorphic markers used in background selection.

S.No.MarkersS.No.MarkersS.No.MarkersS.No.Markers
1 Xbarc10 22 Xcfa2170 43 Xgwm155 64 Xgwm573
2 Xbarc128 23 Xcfa2187 44 Xgwm165 65 Xgwm6
3 Xbarc148 24 Xcfa2193 45 Xgwm186 66 Xgwm60
4 XBarc163 25 Xcfa2262 46 Xgwm191 67 Xgwm613
5 Xbarc197 26 Xcfd13 47 Xgwm192 68 Xgwm63
6 Xbarc212 27 Xcfd193 48 Xgwm2 69 Xgwm635
7 Xbarc229 28 Xcfd20 49 Xgwm234 70 Xgwm66
8 Xbarc23 29 Xcfd242 50 Xgwm249 71 Xwmc11
9 Xbarc232 30 Xcfd39 51 Xgwm251 72 Xwmc247
10 Xbarc417 31 Xcfd48 52 Xgwm294 73 Xwmc291
11 Xbarc69 32 Xcfd6 53 Xgwm304 74 Xwmc311
12 Xbarc73 33 Xcfd71 54 Xgwm328 75 Xwmc317
13 Xbarc83 34 Xcfd88 55 Xgwm332 76 Xwmc417
14 Xbarc98 35 Xgdm63 56 Xgwm334 77 Xwmc420
15 Xcfa2040 36 Xgwm11 57 Xgwm350 78 Xwmc44
16 Xcfa2076 37 Xgwm126 58 Xgwm382 79 Xwmc473
17 Xcfa2114 38 Xgwm131 59 Xgwm403 80 Xwmc500
18 Xcfa2121 39 Xgwm148 60 Xgwm46 81 Xwmc748
19 Xcfa2141 40 Xgwm149 61 Xgwm493 82 Xwmc76
20 Xcfa2155 41 Xgwm153 62 Xgwm495 83 Xwmc807
21 Xcfa2163 42 Xgwm154 63 Xgwm513
Figure 1

Representative gel picture of foreground selection for LrTrk in BC2F2 generation. Here, M: 100 bp ladder; P1: HD2967; P2: Trinakria; 1–22: BC2F2 plants; : Plants homozygous for LrTrk.

Thirty-two BC2F3 NILs and their RP HD2967 and DP Trinakria were also screened for leaf and stripe rust resistance at the seedling and the adult plant stages, respectively. Out of 32 NILs, 30 NILs were found to be resistant to leaf rust with I.T. ‘;1’ (Figure 2, Table 2 and Table 3), while 2 NILs gave a susceptible reaction with I.T. ‘3’. Of the 32 NILs tested for stripe rust resistance at the adult plant stage, 14 NILs were resistant. These 14 NILs were also resistant to leaf rust (Table 2). Thus, of the 32 NILs screened for rust resistance, 16 NILs were found to be resistant to leaf rust only, while 14 NILs showed resistance to both leaf and stripe rusts (Table 2). The NILs with only the leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk are henceforth referred to as HD2967 + LrTrk, while those with leaf and stripe rust resistance are referred to as HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk (YrTrk for stripe rust resistance gene(s) in Trinakria) in this paper. When tested against the leaf rust pathotype 77-5, HD2967 showed susceptibility to leaf rust at the seedling stage with an I.T. of ‘3-’ (Figure 2). When screened against the stripe rust pathotype 110S119 at the adult plant stage (rust response 60S), HD2967 was susceptible to stripe rust (Figure 3). Trinakria, the durum wheat genotype used as a donor for leaf and stripe rust resistance, displayed a high degree of leaf rust resistance with an I.T. ‘;’ (Figure 2; Table 3) and a resistance response (10R) against the stripe rust pathotype 110S119 at the adult plant stage (Figure 3; Table 3). The response of NILs to the leaf rust pathotype 77-5 and the stripe rust pathotype 110S119 can be seen in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. All of the 6 NILs showed I.T. ‘;1′ to the leaf rust pathotype 77-5 when tested at the seedling stage, whereas only 2 NILs (HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk-137-21-82, HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk-137-21-19) showed a resistance response (10R) toward the stripe rust pathotype 110S119 at the adult plant stage (Figure 3).
Figure 2

NILs (HD2967 + LrTrk) along with their parents, HD2967, and Trinakria showing seedling response to leaf rust pathotype 77-5.

Table 2

Number of plants identified with leaf rust and stripe rust resistance in the BC2F3 generation and genome recovery of selected plants.

No. of plants screened for leaf and stripe rust32
No. of plants resistant to leaf rust only16
No. of plants resistant to both leaf and stripe rust14
No. of plants selected for replicated trials6
(RPG) recovery (%) of selected plants in replicated trial97.59–98.79
Table 3

Phenotyping of NILs for leaf and stripe rust resistance at the seedling and the adult plant stages, respectively.

S. No.Near Isogenic Lines of HD2967ITs for Leaf Rust Race 77-5Response to Stripe Rust Race 110S119
1HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk-137-21-82;110R
2HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk-137-21-19;110R
3HD2967 + LrTrk-137-21-28;140S
4HD2967 + LrTrk-137-21-16;130S
5HD2967 + LrTrk-137-21-161;140S
6HD2967 + LrTrk-137-21-163;140S
7HD2967360S
8Trinakria;10R
Figure 3

HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk NILs along with their parents HD2967 and Trinakria showing adult plant response to stripe rust race 110S119.

Based on the yield, seed selection, and rust score of BC2F3 families, 6 NILs were selected for a detailed evaluation in replicated yield trials. Two of the selected NILs were resistant to leaf and stripe rusts (Table 3), while the remaining four showed resistance to leaf rust only. The RPG recovery of these 6 NILs ranged from 97.59% to 98.79%. Graphical representation of the 6 NILs showed recovery of the recurrent parent genome in all chromosomes except in chromosomes 2A, 3B, 5A and 6A, where some residual donor segments were found to be present in the heterozygous state (Figure 4). For the background analysis of the 6 NILs in the BC2F4 generation, D genome-specific SSR markers were also used. It was observed that all of the D genome-specific markers were monomorphic between HD2967 and HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk NILs, and no amplification was observed in Trinakria (Figure 5). Marker analysis with 2NS/2AS specific markers showed that all of these six NILs carried Ae. ventricosa translocation, having rust resistance genes Lr37/Sr38/Yr17 (Figure 6).
Figure 4

Graphical representation of HD2967 NILs carrying leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk and leaf and stripe rust resistance gene LrTrk/YrTrk, showing the extent of recurrent parent genome recovery.

Figure 5

Representative gel picture showing recovery of the D genome in all of the NILs derived from HD2967; (a) Xcfd67, (b) Xcfd84, (c) Xcfd165: D genome specific markers; M: 100 bp ladder, P1: HD2967, P2: Trinakria, 1–6: HD2967 NILs carrying LrTrk.

Figure 6

Amplification with 2NS specific primer pair, VENTRIUP, and LN2. Here, M: 100 bp ladder, 1: Thatcher+Lr37 (+ve control); 2: Agra Local; 3: Kharchia Local; 4: HD2967; 5: Trinkria; 6–11: HD2967 + LrTrk NILs.

2.2. Evaluation of HD2967 NILs for Yield-Related Traits

Six NILs were selected for a detailed evaluation of agro-morphological traits in replicated trials based on their yield in the BC2F3 generation, seed selection, and rust evaluation. These 6 NILs consisted of 4 NILs with only leaf rust resistance and 2 NILs with leaf and stripe rust resistance. The mean performance of six near isogenic lines for yield and yield-related traits is presented in Table 4. While all of the NILs were found to have similar heights as that of RP HD2967, the NIL HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk-137-21-82 was observed to be significantly taller. The NILs HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk-137-21-82 and HD2967 + LrTrk-137-21-163 showed significant superiority for spike length (S.L.) compared to HD2967. Out of these two, NIL HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk-137-21-82 showed a significantly higher number of spikelets/spike (NSpl) than HD2967. The NIL HD2967 + LrTrk-137-21-16 showed a significantly lower spike length (S.L.) and a significantly lower number of spikelets/spike (NSpl). Though there was a difference in spike length (S.L.) and in the number of spikelets/spike (NSpl) in different NILs, all of the NILs showed at par performance for the trait number of seeds/spike (NS). Two NILs, HD2967 + LrTrk-137-21-28 and HD2967 + LrTrk-137-21-161, showed a significantly higher thousand kernel weight (TKW), but their yields were at par with RP HD2967. Overall, all of the NILs of HD2967 produced yield at par with HD2967, and the differences in yield were non-significant.
Table 4

Morphological characterization of NILs of HD2967 carrying leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk.

NILsPHSLNSplNSTKW (gm)YLD (kg)
HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk-137-21-82111.40 *13.72 *25.80 *75.6037.253.94
HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk-137-21-19104.4012.6223.4073.2037.753.69
HD2967 + LrTrk-137-21-28100.2011.0422.2071.4042.00 *4.02
HD2967 + LrTrk-137-21-16103.2010.52 *21.80 *68.2037.003.42
HD2967 + LrTrk-137-21-16199.8011.6822.6071.8042.00 *4.11
HD2967 + LrTrk -137-21-163101.4013.18 *24.2075.2037.003.71
HD2967101.2011.7823.4072.0036.503.63
Mean103.0812.0723.3472.4838.53.78
SD4.461.341.545.592.520.28
CD3.581.181.317.373.80.59

PH: Plant Height; SL: Spike length; NSpl: No. of spikelets per spike; NS: No. of seeds per spike; TKW: Thousand Kernel Weight; YLD: Plot yield in kg; * Significantly different from recurrent parent HD2967.

3. Discussion

The durum wheat genotype Trinakria showed a high degree of resistance against leaf and stripe rusts. A leaf rust resistant gene, tentatively named LrTrk, was mapped on chromosome 5BS in Trinakria [30]. The variety HD2967 is a popular bread wheat, and incorporation of leaf and stripe rust resistance from Trinakria will enhance the usefulness of the variety, which over the years has become highly susceptible to stripe rust, with a moderate susceptibility to leaf rust. Since the leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk in Trinakria was mapped, and the SSR marker Xgwm234 was linked to the resistant gene, a marker-assisted backcrossing program was initiated to transfer the leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk into HD2967. Though information about a linkage between LrTrk and the stripe rust resistance gene(s) in Trinakria was not available, we presumed that some of the lines developed by selecting marker-assisted LrTrk would also be resistant to stripe rust, enabling us to choose lines carrying both leaf and stripe rust resistance in the genetic background of HD2967. Trinakria is a durum wheat genotype and tetraploid wheat (2n = 4x = 28, genome AABB), while cultivar HD2967 is a hexaploid bread wheat (2n = 6x = 42, genome AABBDD). HD2967 was used as a female parent, and Trinakria was used as the pollen parent. All F1 plants are expected to be aneuploid (pentaploid) with 2n = 2x = 35 chromosomes and to show high pollen sterility. However, F1 plants can be easily emasculated and be crossed as a female parent with normal fertile pollens provided by the recurrent parent HD2967 in backcrossing. The spikes of five F1 plants were pollinated with HD2967 pollens to produce sufficient seeds for the BC1F1 generation. The BC1F1 seeds were a mixture of well-filled and shriveled seeds. This was on expected lines as F1 plants, being pentaploid, produce gametes with aneuploid chromosome numbers. The seven D genome chromosomes in F1 plants contributed by HD2967 segregate randomly during gamete formation. Theoretically, the chromosome number in gametes produced by F1 plants are expected to vary from 14 to 21. BC1F1 plants are expected to carry chromosome numbers ranging from 35 to 42. The BC1F1 seeds carrying unbalanced chromosome numbers are expected to have poor endosperm development, which was reflected in the BC1F1 seed, a mixture of seeds with poorly filled and well-filled endosperm. Only seeds with well-developed endosperm were sown. In the BC1FI generation, though 60 plants were identified as carrying the leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk, only 10 plants resembling HD2967 phenotypically were selected for background selection. A plant with a maximum RPG recovery of 83.13% was chosen for further backcrossing. Phenotypic selection combined with marker-assisted background selection in the BC1F1, BC2F1 and BC2F2 generations resulted in a rapid recovery of the background genome of HD2967 from 83.13% in BC1F1 to 93.37% and 98.79% in the BC2F1 and the BC2F2 generations, respectively. However, the RPG recovery of 97.59–98.79% applies only to A and B genomes of NILs; the D genome in NILs is entirely derived from HD2967 and it is expected to remain unaltered. Molecular markers have been effectively used to select rust resistant genes in wheat [20,21,22,23]. The effectiveness of molecular markers is also reflected in our study wherein out of 32 NILs identified as carrying LrTrk with the linked marker Xgwm234, only two NILs were susceptible to leaf rust. At the same time, the remaining 30 lines were resistant. Crossing over between a molecular marker and a rust resistant gene is expected as Xgwm234 is not a gene-specific marker. Screening of 32 NILs for stripe rust resistance in BC2F3 at the adult plant stage identified 14 NILs that carried stripe rust resistance. Thus, combining marker-assisted selection for leaf rust resistance and phenotypic selection for stripe rust resistance enabled the accelerated development of the NILs of the wheat variety HD2967 carrying resistance to both leaf and stripe rusts. Marker-assisted background selection accelerated the recovery of RPG of HD2967 with NILs in BC2F3 showing more than a 97% recovery of RPG. The marker-assisted background analysis was restricted to wheat’s A and B genome only because the donor parent Trinakria lacked the D genome. Thus, the entire D genome in NILs is expected from HD2967, which was also demonstrated in a polymorphism study among HD2967, Trinakria, and NILs. All of the D genome-specific markers used in the study were monomorphic between HD2967 and the NILs, and they failed to amplify in the donor parent Trinakria (Figure 5). The use of a tetraploid donor thus enabled the complete recovery of the D genome in the NILs of HD2967. The wheat variety HD2967 was shown to carry Ae. ventricosa translocation 2NS/2AS, which harbors the linked APR genes Lr37, Yr17 and Sr38 [31]. Six NILs that were finally selected for yield evaluation were screened for 2NS specific markers. The results showed that all of the six NILs carried 2NS/2AS translocation. Thus, out of six NILs, four had 2NS/2AS translocation in addition to the LrTrk gene for leaf rust resistance, while the remaining two NILs carried LrTrk/YrTrk and 2NS/2AS translocation. While Lr37 is an adult plant resistant gene, LrTrk is a seedling resistance gene. Additionally, Lr37 is susceptible to several pathotypes of P. triticina [32]. Thus, LrTrk and Lr37 will provide enhanced resistance against P. triticina in the NILs. Among the six NILs, two were resistant to both leaf and stripe rusts (Table 3). These two lines carried YrTrk along with Yr17; although Yr17 is ineffective against P. striiformis pathotypes [33], making HD2967 susceptible to stripe rust. The NILs of HD2967 developed in this study will provide improved versions of HD2967 with leaf and stripe rust resistance and they will yield at par with HD2967.

4. Materials and Method

4.1. Plant Materials and Backcross Breeding Scheme

The bread wheat variety HD2967 was used as a recurrent parent in the backcross breeding program. The durum wheat genotype Trinakria was used as a donor for leaf and stripe rust resistance. Earlier, a leaf rust resistant gene named LrTrk was identified and mapped on chromosome 5BS in Trinakria [30]. Marker-assisted backcross breeding was used to transfer leaf rust resistance from Trinakria into HD2967 using a linked SSR marker, while conventional pathotype based screening was performed to select plants for stripe rust resistance. The variety HD2967 was crossed as a female parent with Trinakria to produce the F1 generation. The F1 generation was raised, and the hybridity of F1 plants was confirmed using the SSR marker Xgwm234 (F: 5′ GAGTCCTGATGTGAAGCTGTTG 3′; R: 5′ CTCATTGGGGTGTGTACGTG 3′) linked to the leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk. True F1 plants were backcrossed with the recurrent parent (RP) HD2967 to produce the BC1F1 generation. Foreground selection was carried out for the leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk with the linked SSR marker Xgwm234 in BC1F1. Plants carrying LrTrk were subsequently subjected to phenotypic selection for their resemblance to RP HD2967 before background selection using SSR markers showing polymorphism between HD2967 and Trinakria. Ten plants phenotypically resembling HD2967 were used for background analysis. A parental polymorphism survey between HD2967 and Trinakria was carried out with 700 SSR markers, well distributed across A and B genomes of wheat. The plant showing a maximum recovery of the recurrent parent genome (RPG) in the BC1F1 generation was again backcrossed to HD2967 to produce the BC2F1 generation. In the BC2F1 generation, foreground and background selections were also performed, as was done in the BC1F1 generation. The plant carrying LrTrk and a maximum RPG recovery was selfed to produce the BC2F2 generation. In the BC2F2 generation, plants having the leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk in the homozygous state were identified and analyzed for their background recovery. A plant with a maximum RPG recovery in the BC2F2 generation was self-pollinated by covering the spikes with butter paper bags to produce the BC2F3 families. The selection among the BC2F3 families was made based on the yield and the RPG%. The selected BC2F4 lines were evaluated in replicated yield trials.

4.2. Marker Analysis

DNA was extracted from one month old seedlings using the CTAB method [34]. The DNA samples were quantified, and their quality was confirmed using a NanoDropTM spectrophotometer. The DNA samples were diluted to a concentration of 25 ng/μL as working stock and then stored at −20 °C. A PCR reaction was carried out with SSRs in a reaction volume of 10 μL, comprising 4 μL of 2× GoTaq PCR Master Mix (Promega, #M7122), 1 μL of each primer (5 pmol/ul), 2 μL of nuclease-free water, and 2 μL of 25 ng/μL gDNA (50 ng) in 96-well PCR plates with a thermal seal in an Eppendorf thermal cycler. A thermal profile of 4 min at 94 °C (initial denaturation), followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C (denaturation), 30 s at 50–60 °C (varying according to primer annealing temperature), and 30 s at 72 °C (primer extension), with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min were used in a PCR machine for amplification of the SSR markers. The amplified products were resolved on 3.5% agarose gel and then visualized on a U.V. trans-illuminator Gel Documentation System (G: Box, Syngene). The RPG recovery was calculated as the number of homozygous loci corresponding to the recurrent parent + half the number of heterozygous loci/total number of polymorphic SSR markers used ×100. As parental polymorphism was not conducted for markers belonging to the D genome, a confirmation PCR was performed in the BC2F4 generation to identify the recovery of the D genome. Markers specific to the D genome were selected and then used for amplification in HD2967, Trinakria, and the six NILs carrying the LrTrk gene. The RPG recovery of 14 chromosomes belonging to the A and the B genomes of wheat was visualized using Graphical GenoTypes (GGT) Version 2.0 software [35]. The selected NILs were also screened for the presence of Ae. ventricosa translocation 2NS/2AS carrying linked rust resistance genes Lr37, Yr17 and Sr38 present in RP HD2967 using 2NS specific primer pair, VENTRIUP + LN2 [33]. The PCR reaction was performed according to the profile used by [36]. A Thatcher+Lr37 (RL6081) was used as a positive control, whereas Agra Local and Kharchia Local were used as a negative control to confirm the presence of the 2NS/2AS translocation.

4.3. Screening of NILs for Rust Resistance

The NILs in the BC2F3 generation were screened for both leaf and stripe rust resistance. Screening for leaf rust resistance was carried out with the P. triticina pathotype 77-5 at the seedling stage in a glasshouse. Screening for stripe rust resistance was performed in the field with the P. striiformis pathotype 110S119 at the adult plant stage. In India, pathotypes 77-5 and 110S119 are some of the most virulent and prevalent pathotypes of leaf and stripe rusts, respectively. Initial inoculums were obtained from the ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (IIWBR), Regional Station, Flowerdale, Shimla, and they multiplied on the susceptible common wheat cultivar Agra Local at IARI, New Delhi. For screening of leaf rust resistance, the NILs, RP HD2967, and susceptible check Agra Local were sown in aluminum trays (4 × 10 × 3 inches) in the glasshouse. Ten-day-old seedlings were inoculated with the leaf rust pathotype 77-5 by spraying the inoculum with a hand sprayer. The inoculation mixture was prepared by adding urediospores in water with a drop of Tween 20. After inoculation, the trays were kept in humid glass chambers for 48 h and subsequently shifted to glass house benches under ambient light and temperature conditions. A rust response (infection type) was recorded 12 days after inoculation, as described by Stakmann et al. (1962) [37]. For stripe rust screening, parents HD2967 and Trinakria and NILs carrying leaf rust resistance gene LrTrk were sown in yellow rust nursery in 1m rows each. Infector rows were planted after every 20 rows. To ensure uniform disease spread, one row of infector between two 1m row beds and two rows of infectors surrounding the test material were also planted. The spores of the stripe rust pathotype 110S119 were sprayed as a suspension in water fortified with Tween 20 at the booting stage. The inoculum mixture was sprayed thrice at the booting stage with two–three days interval. The plant response to stripe rust was scored based on the Modified Cobb’s scale [38] and disease severity (0–100%).

4.4. Evaluation of HD2967 + LrTrk NILs for Agro-Morphological Traits

Following the recommended package of practices at IARI, New Delhi, NILs, HD2967 + LrTrk, HD2967 + LrTrk/YrTrk, and the recurrent parent HD2967 were evaluated for agro-morphological traits in a randomized complete block design with two replications. The data on plant height (P.H.), spike length (S.L.), thousand kernel weight (TKW), the number of spikelets per spike (NSplSp), and the number of seeds per spike (NSSp) were recorded on 5 randomly selected plants from the inside rows of each plot. Each plot of 6 m2 size was harvested by machine and their plot yield (in kg) from each replication was recorded. The data on morphological traits was analyzed using OPSTAT statistical software (CCS HAU, Hisar) [39].
  12 in total

1.  GGT 2.0: versatile software for visualization and analysis of genetic data.

Authors:  Ralph van Berloo
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Deadly new wheat disease threatens Europe's crops.

Authors:  Shaoni Bhattacharya
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA.

Authors:  M G Murray; W F Thompson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1980-10-10       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Emergence and Spread of New Races of Wheat Stem Rust Fungus: Continued Threat to Food Security and Prospects of Genetic Control.

Authors:  Ravi P Singh; David P Hodson; Yue Jin; Evans S Lagudah; Michael A Ayliffe; Sridhar Bhavani; Matthew N Rouse; Zacharias A Pretorius; Les J Szabo; Julio Huerta-Espino; Bhoja R Basnet; Caixia Lan; Mogens S Hovmøller
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Genetics of resistance to wheat leaf rust.

Authors:  J A Kolmer
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 13.078

6.  Genetics and mapping of a new leaf rust resistance gene in Triticum aestivum L. × Triticum timopheevii Zhuk. derivative 'Selection G12'.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Singh; Jai Bhagwan Sharma; Pradeep Kumar Singh; Anupam Singh; Niharika Mallick
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 7.  The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology.

Authors:  Ralph Dean; Jan A L Van Kan; Zacharias A Pretorius; Kim E Hammond-Kosack; Antonio Di Pietro; Pietro D Spanu; Jason J Rudd; Marty Dickman; Regine Kahmann; Jeff Ellis; Gary D Foster
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.663

8.  A novel leaf rust resistance gene introgressed from Aegilops markgrafii maps on chromosome arm 2AS of wheat.

Authors:  K Rani; B R Raghu; S K Jha; Priyanka Agarwal; Niharika Mallick; M Niranjana; J B Sharma; A K Singh; N K Sharma; S Rajkumar; S M S Tomar
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-06-07       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 9.  The contribution of wheat to human diet and health.

Authors:  Peter R Shewry; Sandra J Hey
Journal:  Food Energy Secur       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.109

10.  Molecular mapping of a new recessive wheat leaf rust resistance gene originating from Triticum spelta.

Authors:  Vishal Dinkar; S K Jha; Niharika Mallick; M Niranjana; Priyanka Agarwal; J B Sharma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Marker-assisted transfer of leaf and stripe rust resistance from Triticum turgidum var. durum cv. Trinakria to wheat variety HD2932.

Authors:  Niharika Mallick; Shailendra K Jha; Priyanka Agarwal; Sachin Kumar; Anchal Mall; Niranjana M; Manish K Choudhary; Ajay Kumar Chandra; Shreshtha Bansal; M S Saharan; J B Sharma
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.772

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.