| Literature DB >> 35567053 |
Meiram Zh Burkeev1, Meruyert S Zhunissova1, Yerkeblan M Tazhbayev1, Vitaliy N Fomin1, Akmaral Zh Sarsenbekova1, Gulsym K Burkeyeva1, Akerke T Kazhmuratova1, Tolkyn S Zhumagalieva1, Elmira Zh Zhakupbekova1, Tolkyn O Khamitova2.
Abstract
Studies have shown the possibility of synthesizing new polymers based on polypropylene glycol maleate with acrylic acid in the presence of a RAFT agent (2-Cyano-2-propyl dodecyl trithiocarbonate CPDT). The effect of RAFT agent concentration on network density has been shown to be connected with product yield. Herein, the composition of the obtained copolymers was determined using FTIR spectrometry in combination with the chemometric method of partial least squares (or projection to latent structures). To investigate the synthesized hydrogels, the degrees of equilibrium swelling was studied. The resulting objects were characterized by infrared spectroscopy. The surface morphology of the polymers was studied and the pore sizes were estimated using scanning electron microscopy. The structure of the test samples was confirmed by NMR spectroscopy. The thermal stability of crosslinked polymers was determined using thermogravimetry.Entities:
Keywords: acrylic acid RAFT polymerization; polypropylene glycol maleate; unsaturated polyester
Year: 2022 PMID: 35567053 PMCID: PMC9101380 DOI: 10.3390/polym14091884
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Radical copolymerization of p-PGM with AA in a dioxane solution in the presence of a RAFT agent. [M1]:[M2] = 49.9:50.1 mol.%, T = 343 K, [I] = 8 mM.
| [RAFT], mM | Cross-Linked Copolymer | Branched Copolymer | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield, % | [m1]:[m2] | Swelling, | Yield, % | [m1]:[m2] | |
| - | 96.93 | 48.21:51.79 | 187.12 | - | - |
| 10.02 | 94.15 | 45.45:54.55 | 201.16 | 3.87 | 31.58:68.42 |
| 30.01 | 78.21 | 46.15:53.85 | 267.21 | 13.52 | 33.33:66.67 |
| 50.01 | 49.42 | 47.06:52.94 | 314.17 | 47.45 | 43.75:56.25 |
| 80.03 | 4.96 | 47.06:52.94 | 385.11 | 92.26 | 45.45:54.55 |
Figure 1Dependence of the concentration of the RAFT-agent on the yield of copolymers.
Figure 2Schematic structure of p-PGM:AA (a), p-PGM:AA:CPDT (b).
Figure 3IR spectra of copolymers of p-PGM:AA:[CPDT] = 80 mM.
Figure 4Topography of the polymer p-PGM:AA (a); surface morphology of the polymer p-PGM:AA:[CPDT] = 80 mM (b).
Figure 5TG curves of analysis of p-PGM:AA copolymer (a) and p-PGM:AA:CPDT copolymers obtained in the presence of 10 mM (b), 30 mM (c), 50 mM (d) RAFT-agent.
Results of TG analysis of the decomposition of p-PGM:AA and p-PGM:AA:CPDT copolymers in a nitrogen atmosphere.
| [RAFT], mM | Ti, °C | Tf, °C | Tmax, °C | Weight Loss, mg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | 310.0 | 400.0 | 362.0 | 6.9 |
| 10.02 | 325.0 | 420.0 | 372.0 | 7.4 |
| 30.01 | 330.0 | 423.0 | 372.0 | 7.2 |
| 50.01 | 326.0 | 420.0 | 374.0 | 6.7 |
Figure 6Family of curves f(α) from the degree of conversion (α) for copolymers p-PGM:AA and p-PGM:AA:CPDT (10 mM).
Values of apparent activation energy of p-PGM:AA and p-PGM:AA:CPDT copolymers in a nitrogen atmosphere.
| [RAFT], mM | Ea, kJ/Mol | A, s−1 |
|---|---|---|
| - | 124.52 | 6.29 × 1012 |
| 10.02 | 126.27 | 1.60 × 1013 |
| 30.01 | 146.23 | 4.35 × 1014 |
| 50.01 | 171.38 | 8.86 × 1016 |