| Literature DB >> 35566883 |
Joanna Tkaczewska1, Ewelina Jamróz2, Paulina Guzik1, Michał Kopeć3.
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to produce, innovative and, at the same time, environmentally-friendly, biopolymer double-layer films with fish processing waste and active lingonberry extract as additives. These double-layered films were based on furcellaran (FUR) (1st layer) and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) with a gelatin hydrolysate (HGEL) (2nd layer). The aim of the study was to assess their impact on the durability of perishable salmon fillets during storage, and to evaluate their degree of biodegradation. The fillets were analyzed for changes in microbiological quality (total microbial count, yeast and molds, and psychrotrophic bacteria), biogenic amine content (HPLC), and lipid oxidation (peroxidase and acid values, TBARS). The degree of biodegradation includes analysis of film and compost chemical composition solubility, respiratory activity, and ecotoxicity testing. The obtained results allow to suggest that active films are not only bacteriostatic, but even bactericidal when they used to coat fish fillets. Concerning the group of samples covered with the double-layer films, a 19.42% lower total bacteria count was noted compared to the control samples. Furthermore, it can be observed that the applied double-layer films have a potentially strong inhibitory effect on the accumulation of biogenic amines in fish, which is correlated with its antimicrobial effect (the total biogenic amine content for control samples totaled 263.51 mg/kg, while for the double-layer samples, their value equaled: 164.90 mg/kg). The achieved results indicate a high biodegradation potential, however, a too low pH of the film results in limiting seed germination and growth. Despite that, of these, double-layer films are a technology that has applicative potential.Entities:
Keywords: active protein hydrolysates; double-layered films; furcellaran; lingonberry extract
Year: 2022 PMID: 35566883 PMCID: PMC9104978 DOI: 10.3390/polym14091717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Parameters of incubated materials.
| Parameter | Compost | Double-Layered Films |
|---|---|---|
| pH | 8.12 ± 0.21 | 3.21 ± 0.25 |
| EC [mS/cm] | 2.88 ± 0.15 | 0.963 ± 0.05 |
| N [g/kg] | 2.443 ± 0.13 | 0.896 ± 0.04 |
| C [g/kg] | 30.65 ± 0.93 | 38.75 ± 0.99 |
| C:N | 12.54 ± 0.52 | 43.40 ± 1.50 |
| Solubility [%] | - | 72.79 ± 2.97 |
| Degree of dry matter loss after incubation [%] | 7.36 ± 5.01 | 84.95 ± 3.12 ** |
| Ash [%] | - | 4.95 ± 1.81 |
** after taking losses at the control facility into account.
Equations of respiratory activity for incubated materials over 3 equal periods covering 14 days (mg CO2 ÷ g h) *.
| Period | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–112 h | 113–224 h | 224–336 h | |
| Control | Y = 0.6512 + 8.7823 | Y = 0.3023x + 41.982 | Y = 0.248x + 53.545 |
| Double-layered films | Y = 2.4205x + 7.7248 | Y = 0.6976x + 173.71 | Y = 0.3415x + 245.54 |
* based on the dry weight of the substrate. CONTROL: samples without films and the control object comprised a vessel. Double-layered films: the object with double-layered films.
Figure 1Photos of germination and growth of cress (Lepidium sativum L.) seeds with double-layered films.
Figure 2The use of double-layer films as packaging materials [14,15].
Figure 3(A) The method of packing salmon in 2 types of films. (B) Total aerobic bacteria in Salmo salar fillets; (C) yeasts and molds in Salmo salar fillets; (D) psychrotrophic bacteria in Salmo salar fillets. Films: samples stored in innovative films; LDPE: control group samples stored in synthetic films.
Biogenic amine concentration in fish samples through storage in 4 °C (mg/kg).
| Group/Day | TRPYP | PHEN | PUTRY | CADAWE | HISTAM | TYRAM | SPER | SPR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.30 ± 0.07 | 0.68 ± 0.16 | 3.50 ± 0.68 | 1.46 ± 0.56 | 6.26 ± 1.175 | 2.34 ± 0.50 | 2.34 ± 0.50 | 4.01 ± 0.65 | |
|
|
| 1.08 b ± 0.12 | 0.62 b ± 0.03 | 2.83 b ± 0.40 | 29.83 b ± 7.67 | 26.36 a ± 4.17 | 3.91 b ± 1.09 | 2.12 b ± 0.06 | 2.94 a ± 0.34 |
|
| 3.16 b ± 0.19 | 5.42 b ± 0.36 | 9.00 b ± 1.00 | 61.06 a ± 2.24 | 86.48 b ± 13.50 | 23.34 b ± 1.27 | 2.08 a ± 0.23 | 3.42 b ± 0.21 | |
|
| 3.73 b ± 0.34 | 10.26 b ± 2.09 | 11.86 b ± 1.28 | 43.00 a ± 1.73 | 160.92 b ± 6.02 | 26.23 b ± 2.08 | 3.44 b ± 0.33 | 4.08 b ± 0.55 | |
|
|
| 0.17 a ± 0.03 | 0.43 a ± 0.03 | 1.86 a ± 0.28 | 2.54 a ± 0.49 | 24.53 a ± 2.73 | 1.66 a ± 0.32 | 1.84 a ± 0.13 | 2.57 a ± 0.23 |
|
| 0.66 a ± 0.05 | 0.90 a ± 0.27 | 3.66 a ± 0.91 | 51.35 a ± 9.85 | 52.36 a ± 2.98 | 9.01 a ± 0.10 | 2.37 a ± 0.39 | 2.74 a ± 0.38 | |
|
| 1.26 a ± 0.25 | 4.26 a ± 0.25 | 4.54 a ± 0.4 | 44.66 a ± 1.58 | 87.44 a ± 3.49 | 18.07 a ± 2.43 | 1.87 a ± 0.41 | 2.81 a ± 0.62 | |
Values are presented as mean ± SD. TRPYP: tryptamine, PHEN: phenylethylamine, PUTRY: putrescine, CADAWE: cadawerin, HISTAM: histamine, TYRAM: tyramine, SPER: spermidine, and SPR: spermine. Films: samples stored in innovative films and LDPE: control samples stored in synthetic films. Different lettering next to the mean values for the LDPE and Double-layered films groups on individual days of storage indicate statistical differences between these groups (p < 0.01).
Lipid oxidation of fish samples through storage in 4 °C.
| Peroxide Value (Milliequivalents of Active Oxygen/kg Product) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 3 | Day 6 | Day 10 | |
|
| 7.47 ± 0.34 | 14.58 a ± 0.36 | 35.18 a ± 0.59 | 46.10 a ± 0.15 |
|
| 14.51 a ± 0.14 | 27.55 a ± 2.40 | 35.70 a ± 1.79 | |
| Acid value [mg KOH/g] | ||||
|
| 1.910.33 | 2.78 a ± 0.06 | 3.91 a ± 0.05 | 8.33 a ± 0.46 |
|
| 2.21 a ± 0.29 | 3.83 a ± 1.11 | 4.05 a ± 1.38 | |
| TBARS [mg/kg] | ||||
|
| 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.18 a ± 0.03 | 0.80 a ± 0.05 | 0.34 a ± 0.12 |
|
| 1.11 b ± 0.25 | 2.38 b ± 0.30 | 1.79 b ± 0.06 | |
Values are presented as mean ± SD. Different lettering next to the mean values for the LDPE and Double-layered films groups on individual days of storage indicate statistical differences between these groups (p < 0.01).