| Literature DB >> 35566581 |
Piergiorgio Francia1, Elisa Gualdani2, Laura Policardo2, Leonardo Bocchi1, Flavia Franconi3, Paolo Francesconi2, Giuseppe Seghieri2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of death after hospitalizations for diabetic foot (DF) complications, comparing two different cohorts of people with or without a prior history of DF hospitalizations across the years 2011 to 2018 in Tuscany, Italy. The DF complications were categorized by administrative source datasets such as: amputations (both major and minor), gangrene, ulcers, infections, Charcot and revascularizations. A further aim was to present the trend over time of the first ever incidents of diabetic foot hospitalizations in Tuscany. The eight-year-mortality rate was higher in the cohort with prior hospitalizations (n = 6633; 59%) compared with the cohort with first incident DF hospitalizations (n = 5028; 44%). Amputations (especially major ones) and ulcers had the worst effect on survival in people without basal history of DF hospitalizations and respectively in those with a history of prior DF hospitalizations. In both cohorts, revascularization procedures, when compared to ulcers, were associated with a significantly reduced risk of mortality. The prevalence rate of minor amputations showed a slightly rising trend over time. This result agrees with the national trend. Conversely, the progressive increase over time of revascularizations, associated with the fractional decrease in the rate of gangrene, suggests a trend for more proactive behavior by DF care teams in Tuscany.Entities:
Keywords: amputations; diabetic foot complications; diabetic foot ulcers; first ever incident diabetic foot hospital admission; hospitalizations; mortality risk
Year: 2022 PMID: 35566581 PMCID: PMC9105877 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092454
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Descriptive analysis for variables of both cohorts under study, with or without a prior history of hospitalizations for diabetic foot complications.
| without Prior Hospitalizations for Diabetic Foot | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diabetic Foot Lesions | Major Amputations | Minor Amputations | Revascularizations | Gangrene | Infections | Charcot | Ulcer | Total |
|
| 143 (1.2) | 306 (2.6) | 2854 (24.7) | 6282 (54.5) | 908 (7.9) | 51 (0.4) | 985 (8.5) |
|
|
| 3.0 (2.5–3.5) | 6.5 (5.8–7.3) | 77.3 (74.5–80.2) | 293.2 (286–300.6) | 20.4 (19.1–21.7) | 1.1 (0.8–1.4) | 22.3 (21.0–23.8) |
|
|
| 74 (12) | 68 (13) | 70 (10) | 73 (10) | 66 (13) | 62 (13) | 72 (12) |
|
|
| 73 (51) | 199 (65) | 1875 (66) | 3865 (54.4) | 548 (60.3) | 30 (58.8) | 518 (52.6) |
|
|
| ||||||||
| 0 No. (%) | 46 (31.2) | 145 (47.4) | 1149 (40.3) | 2364 (37.6) | 435 (47.9) | 22 (43.1) | 413 (41.9) |
|
| 1 No. (%) | 22 (15.4) | 54 (17.6) | 520 (18.2) | 1182 (18.8) | 165 (18.2) | 10 (19.6) | 188 (19.1) |
|
| 2+ No. (%) | 75 (52.4) | 107 (35.0) | 1185 (41.5) | 2736 (43.6) | 308 (33.9) | 19 (37.3) | 384 (39.0) |
|
|
| ||||||||
| Insulin | 14.0 | 13.4 | 12.0 | 11.9 | 10.6 | 15.7 | 13.1 |
|
| Oral | 42.7 | 41.5 | 41.5 | 44.4 | 36.6 | 29.4 | 44.2 |
|
| Insulin/oral | 10.5 | 13.1 | 11.8 | 11.8 | 13.0 | 25.5 | 15.3 |
|
| None | 32.9 | 32.0 | 34.6 | 31.9 | 39.9 | 31.4 | 27.4 |
|
|
| 96; | 122; | 939; | 3087; | 310; | 12; | 462; | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 39 (0.3) | 86 (0.8) | 1561 (13.9) | 7049 (62.7) | 1273 (11.3) | 113 (1.0) | 1125 (10.0) |
|
|
| 71 (13) | 69 (14) | 74 (9) | 75 (10) | 69 (13) | 67 (14) | 73 (11) |
|
|
| 31 (72) | 54 (60) | 1099 (71) | 4822 (64.8) | 739 (58.1) | 63 (55.8) | 629 (55.9) | 66.1 |
|
| ||||||||
| 0 No. (%) | 11 (25.6) | 23 (25.6) | 70 (4.5) | 440 (6.2) | 185 (14.5) | 14 (12.4) | 44 (3.9) |
|
| 1 No. (%) | 11 (25.6) | 23 (25.6) | 284 (18.3) | 1122 (15.9) | 287 (22.6) | 21 (18.6) | 183 (16.3) |
|
| 2+ No. (%) | 21 (48.8) | 44 (48.8) | 1199 (77.2) | 5487 (77.9) | 801 (62.9) | 78 (69.0) | 898 (79.8) |
|
|
| ||||||||
| Insulin | 16.3 | 21.1 | 14.2 | 21.4 | 25.6 | 30.1 | 34.7 |
|
| Oral | 37.2 | 35.6 | 42.6 | 37.8 | 31.8 | 23.0 | 27.7 |
|
| Insulin/oral | 9.3 | 13.3 | 9.9 | 16.3 | 17.9 | 18.6 | 22.8 |
|
| None | 37.2 | 30.0 | 33.3 | 24.5 | 24.7 | 28.3 | 14.8 |
|
|
| 22; | 39; | 818; | 4320; | 633; | 52; | 749; |
|
Figure 1Prevalence rates of hospitalizations for diabetic foot complications across the years 2011 to 2018 in Tuscany (* Logarithmic scale).
Prevalence rates of hospitalizations for diabetic foot complications across the years 2011 to 2018 in Tuscany. Hospitalization rate for diabetic foot complications = −038 × incidence rate + 14.2.
| Year | Ulcers | Infections | Gangrene | Charcot | Revascularizations | Major Amputations | Minor Amputations | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | No. (%) | |
| 2011 | 138 (8.5) | 127 (7.8) | 940 (57.7) | 9 (0.6) | 358 (22.0) | 18 (1.1) | 38 (2.3) | 1628 (14.1) |
| 2012 | 144 (9.3) | 130 (8.4) | 871 (56.3) | 10 (0.6) | 335 (2.6) | 24 (1.5) | 33 (2.1) | 1547 (13.4) |
| 2013 | 139 (9.4) | 117 (7.9) | 814 (55.3) | 9 (0.6) | 348 (23.7) | 16 (1.1) | 28 (1.9) | 1471 (12.8) |
| 2014 | 122 (8.5) | 104 (7.3) | 795 (5.6) | 7 (0.5) | 349 (24.4) | 20 (1.4) | 33 (2.3) | 1430 (12.4) |
| 2015 | 117 (8.5) | 102 (7.4) | 743 (53.9) | 1 (0.1) | 348 (25.2) | 17 (1.2) | 50 (3.6) | 1378 (11.9) |
| 2016 | 114 (7.8) | 109 (7.4) | 780 (53.3) | 3 (0.2) | 399 (27.2) | 18 (1.2) | 41 (2.8) | 1464 (12.7) |
| 2017 | 106 (7.8) | 115 (8.4) | 695 (50.9) | 7 (0.5) | 377 (27.6) | 19 (1.4) | 45 (3.3) | 1364 (11.8) |
| 2018 | 105 (8.4) | 104 (8.3) | 644 (51.6) | 5 (0.4) | 340 (27.3) | 11 (0.9) | 38 (3.0) | 1247 (10.8) |
| P for trend | NS | NS | 0.0001 | NS | <0.0001 | NS | 0.007 | 0.0001 |
Figure 2Survival probability by Kaplan Meier analysis for diabetic foot complications in people with previous hospitalizations for diabetic foot (A) and after first incident hospitalization for diabetic foot (B).
Figure 3Adjusted Hazard Ratios (HR) of diabetic foot complications in both cohorts with (▲) and without (◾) previous hospitalizations for diabetic foot. Ulcers are considered here as the reference group.