| Literature DB >> 35566322 |
Boshi Cheng1,2, Xing Li1,2, Linhai Pan2, Hongqiang Xu2, Haojie Duan2, Qian Wu2, Bo Yin2, Haiyong He2.
Abstract
Although K+ is readily inserted into graphite, the volume expansion of graphite of up to 60% upon the formation of KC8, together with its slow diffusion kinetics, prevent graphite from being used as an anode for potassium-ion batteries (PIBs). Soft carbon with low crystallinity and an incompact carbon structure can overcome these shortcomings of graphite. Here, ultra-thin two-dimensional (2D) wrinkled soft carbon sheets (USCs) are demonstrated to have high specific capacity, excellent rate capability, and outstanding reversibility. The wrinkles themselves prevent the dense stacking of micron-sized sheets and provide sufficient space to accommodate the volume change of USCs during the insertion/extraction of K+. The ultra-thin property reduces strain during the formation of K-C compounds, and further maintains structural stability. The wrinkles and heteroatoms also introduce abundant edge defects that can provide more active sites and shorten the K+ migration distance, improving reaction kinetics. The optimized USC20-1 electrode exhibits a reversible capacity of 151 mAh g-1 even at 6400 mA g-1, and excellent cyclic stability up to 2500 cycles at 1000 mA g-1. Such comprehensive electrochemical performance will accelerate the adoption of PIBs in electrical energy applications.Entities:
Keywords: anode; carbon sheet; potassium-ion batteries; two-dimensional
Year: 2022 PMID: 35566322 PMCID: PMC9099802 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1SEM and TEM images of (a,e,i) USC20−1, (b,f,j) USC30−1, (c,g,k) USC40−1 and (d,h,l) USC50−1. (m) N2 adsorption and desorption curves, and a (n) pore volume distribution diagram.
Figure 2(a)XRD patterns and (b) Raman spectra of all samples.
Figure 3The CV curves at 0.1 mV s−1 scanning speed and charge–discharge curves at 25 mA g−1: (a,b) USC20−1, (c,d) USC30−1, (e,f) USC40−1.
Figure 4Electrochemical test. (a) Comparison of the capacities above and below 1 V at 25 mA g−1 of USCs; (b) cycle stability at 25 mA g−1; (c) charge and discharge curves of USC20−1 at different current densities; (d) rate performance; (e) cycle stability at 1.0 A g−1.
Figure 5(a) CV curves at different scan rates; (b) linear fitting relationship between log i and log v at different redox peaks; (c) CV curves of electrode capacitance contributions at a scan rate of 1.0 mV s−1; (d) contribution ratio of pseudocapacitive response at different scan rates.