| Literature DB >> 35566287 |
Iman Fatima1, Akhtar Rasul1, Shahid Shah2, Malik Saadullah3, Nayyer Islam1, Ahmed Khames4, Ahmad Salawi5, Muhammad Masood Ahmed6, Yosif Almoshari5, Ghulam Abbas1, Mohammed A S Abourehab7,8, Sajid Mehmood Khan9, Zunera Chauhdary10, Meshal Alshamrani5, Nader Ibrahim Namazi11, Demiana M Naguib12.
Abstract
The occurrence of fungal infections has increased over the past two decades. It is observed that superficial fungal infections are treated by conventional dosage forms, which are incapable of treating deep infections due to the barrier activity possessed by the stratum corneum of the skin. This is why the need for a topical preparation with advanced penetration techniques has arisen. This research aimed to encapsulate fluconazole (FLZ) in a novasome in order to improve the topical delivery. The novasomes were prepared using the ethanol injection technique and characterized for percent entrapment efficiency (EE), particle size (PS), zeta potential (ZP), drug release, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and antifungal activity. The FN7 formulation with 94.45% EE, 110 nm PS and -24 ZP proved to be the best formulation. The FN7 formulation showed a 96% release of FLZ in 8 h. FTIR showed the compatibility of FLZ with excipients and DSC studies confirmed the thermal stability of FLZ in the developed formulation. The FN7 formulation showed superior inhibition of the growth of Candida albicans compared to the FLZ suspension using a resazurin reduction assay, suggesting high efficacy in inhibiting fungal growth.Entities:
Keywords: antifungal activity; ethanol injection technique; fluconazole; novasomes; toxicity study
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35566287 PMCID: PMC9103678 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1PS (A) and ZP (B) of optimum formulation FN7 showed a particle size of 110 nm and a ZP value of −24.
PS, PDI, ZP and EE of all novasome formulations.
| Code | PS (nm) | PDI | ZP (mV) | EE (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FN1 | 145 | 0.120 | −22 | 76.34 |
| FN2 | 178 | 0.230 | −19 | 70.23 |
| FN3 | 123 | 0.345 | −23 | 56.12 |
| FN4 | 149 | 0.319 | −17 | 80.20 |
| FN5 | 236 | 0.287 | −20 | 45.09 |
| FN6 | 298 | 0.067 | −18 | 89.18 |
| FN7 | 110 | 0.023 | −24 | 94.45 |
| FN8 | 120 | 0.069 | −21 | 49.82 |
| FN9 | 141 | 0.267 | −21 | 52.98 |
| FN10 | 192 | 0.345 | −20 | 90.06 |
Figure 2The release of FLZ from prepared novasomes containing different ratios of FFAs and SAAs.
Release kinetics by different models.
| Code | Zero Order | First Order | Higuchi | Korsmeyer–Peppas | Hixon–Crowell | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | R2 | R2 | R2 | n | R2 | |
| FN1 | 0.9878 | 0.9581 | 0.831 | 0.993 | 1.141 | 0.9693 |
| FN2 | 0.9935 | 0.9599 | 0.8456 | 0.9959 | 1.091 | 0.9737 |
| FN3 | 0.9961 | 0.984 | 0.8497 | 0.9974 | 1.066 | 0.9893 |
| FN4 | 0.9967 | 0.9898 | 0.8859 | 0.9973 | 0.958 | 0.9938 |
| FN5 | 0.9888 | 0.9439 | 0.8285 | 0.9948 | 1.152 | 0.9612 |
| FN6 | 0.9898 | 0.9797 | 0.892 | 0.9925 | 0.916 | 0.9884 |
| FN7 | 0.978 | 0.9666 | 0.9356 | 0.9975 | 0.793 | 0.9834 |
| FN8 | 0.9805 | 0.9818 | 0.9308 | 0.9978 | 0.806 | 0.9931 |
| FN9 | 0.9903 | 0.9656 | 0.8668 | 0.9903 | 0.995 | 0.9773 |
| FN10 | 0.9984 | 0.9685 | 0.8809 | 0.9987 | 0.973 | 0.9836 |
Figure 3FTIR spectra of cholesterol (A), oleic acid (B), Span 60 (C), FLZ (D), drug-unloaded FN7 (E) and FLZ-loaded FN7 (F).
Figure 4DSC thermograms (A) and TGA (B) of FLZ (A), oleic acid (B), Span 60 (C), cholesterol (D), blank formulation (E) and FLZ-loaded formulation (F).
Figure 5SEM images of drug-unloaded (A–C) and FLZ-loaded (D–F) formulations at different resolutions.
Figure 6Percentage (%) of inhibition (A–C) and zone of inhibition (D). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5), ns = non-significant compared to FLZ suspension. Antifungal activity of FN7, unloaded novasomes, FLZ suspension and standard drug (E).
Hematological parameters (n = 12).
| Phases | Hemoglobin | Red Blood Cells (RBCs) | White Blood Cells (WBCs) | Platelet Count (103/µL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | ||||
| Administration | 14.2 ± 1.35 ** | 7.99 ± 2.19 ** | 5.27 ± 1.80 * | 1023 ± 3.45 ** |
| Recovery | 14.3 ± 1.94 * | 8.01 ± 2.31 * | 5.29 ± 1.67 * | 1022 ± 3.28 ** |
| Experimental group | ||||
| Administration | 14.3 ± 1.18 ** | 7.96 ± 2.17 ** | 5.26 ± 1.21 ** | 1019 ± 3.29 * |
| Recovery | 14.4 ± 1.03 * | 8.21 ± 2.11 * | 5.28 ± 1.39 * | 1020 ± 3.12 ** |
* < 0.05 and ** < 0.01.
Biochemical parameters (n = 12).
| Phases | Albumin | Globulin | Creatinine | Glucose | Cholesterol | Triglycerides |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | ||||||
| Administration | 2.3 ± 0.23 * | 157 ± 2.15 ** | 0.60 ± 0.04 * | 161 ± 3.78 ** | 56 ± 1.32 ** | 38 ± 1.02 ** |
| Recovery | 2.4 ± 0.21 * | 156 ± 2.65 ** | 0.58 ± 0.05 * | 158 ± 4.09 * | 55 ± 1.54 ** | 37 ± 1.11 * |
| Experimental group | ||||||
| Administration | 2.2 ± 0.67 ** | 158 ± 2.98 * | 0.58 ± 0.07 ** | 163 ± 4.01 * | 63 ± 1.76 ** | 42 ± 1.20 * |
| Recovery | 2.5 ± 0.45 * | 160 ± 2.56 * | 0.56 ± 0.06 * | 160 ± 3.21 ** | 54 ± 1.96 * | 36 ± 1.32 * |
* < 0.05 and ** < 0.01.
Composition of different novasome formulations.
| Formulation | Type of SAA | Type of FFA | Ratio of SAA: FFA | Cholesterol (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FN1 | Span 80 | Oleic acid | 2:1 | 30 |
| FN2 | Span 80 | Oleic acid | 1:1 | 30 |
| FN3 | Span 80 | Stearic acid | 2:1 | 30 |
| FN4 | Span 80 | Stearic acid | 1:1 | 30 |
| FN5 | Tween 80 | Oleic acid | 2:1 | 30 |
| FN6 | Tween 80 | Oleic acid | 1:1 | 30 |
| FN7 | Span 60 | Oleic acid | 2:1 | 30 |
| FN8 | Span 60 | Oleic acid | 1:1 | 30 |
| FN9 | Span 60 | Stearic acid | 2:1 | 30 |
| FN10 | Span 60 | Stearic acid | 1:1 | 30 |