| Literature DB >> 35566166 |
Maciej Strzemski1, Sławomir Dresler1,2, Beata Podkościelna3, Kamil Skic4, Ireneusz Sowa1, Daniel Załuski5, Rob Verpoorte6, Sylwia Zielińska7, Paweł Krawczyk8, Magdalena Wójciak1.
Abstract
The Chelidonium majus plant is rich in biologically active isoquinoline alkaloids. These alkaline polar compounds are isolated from raw materials with the use of acidified water or methanol; next, after alkalisation of the extract, they are extracted using chloroform or dichloromethane. This procedure requires the use of toxic solvents. The present study assessed the possibility of using volatile natural deep eutectic solvents (VNADESs) for the efficient and environmentally friendly extraction of Chelidonium alkaloids. The roots and herb of the plant were subjected three times to extraction with various menthol, thymol, and camphor mixtures and with water and methanol (acidified and nonacidified). It has been shown that alkaloids can be efficiently isolated using menthol-camphor and menthol-thymol mixtures. In comparison with the extraction with acidified methanol, the use of appropriate VNADESs formulations yielded higher amounts of protopine (by 16%), chelidonine (35%), berberine (76%), chelerythrine (12%), and coptisine (180%). Sanguinarine extraction efficiency was at the same level. Additionally, the values of the contact angles of the raw materials treated with the tested solvents were assessed, and higher wetting dynamics were observed in the case of VNADESs when compared with water. These results suggest that VNADESs can be used for the efficient and environmentally friendly extraction of Chelidonium alkaloids.Entities:
Keywords: NADESs; berberine; chelerythrine; chelidonine; coptisine; greater celandine; green chemistry; isoquinoline alkaloids; protopine; sanguinarine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35566166 PMCID: PMC9101032 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092815
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Chemical structures of major alkaloids in Chelidonium majus L.: (a)—Protopine, (b)—Chelidonine, (c)—Berberine, (d)—Chelerythrine, (e)—Coptisine, and (f)—Sanguinarine.
Figure 2Yields of extraction of isoquinoline alkaloids from Chelidonium majus roots with volatile natural deep eutectic solvents and commonly used extractants; (a–f), yields of extraction: protopine, chelidonine, berberine, chelerythrine, coptisine, and sanguinarine respectively. MT—Menthol–thymol mixtures; MC—Menthol-camphor mixtures; TC—Thymol-camphor mixtures. The mass:mass ratio of the components in the mixtures is shown next to the symbols. MeOHHCl and H2OHCl-MeOH and water acidified with hydrochloric acid to a concentration of 0.05 M. Data are mean ± SE (n = 5); values for individual raw materials followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test).
Values of density and surface tension measured for the obtained VNADESs and control extractants.
| TC | MT | MC | MeOH | H2O | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density (g/cm3) | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.91 | 0.79 | 0.99 |
| Surface tension (J/m2) | 32 | 30 | 29 | 24 | 72 |
Figure 3Scaled scatter plot of the principal component analysis of isoquinoline alkaloids and physical properties of extractants (MT—Menthol-thymol mixtures; MC—Menthol-camphor mixtures; TC—Thymol-camphor mixtures. The mass:mass ratio of the components in the mixtures is shown next to the symbols. MeOHHCl and H2OHCl-MeOH and water acidified with hydrochloric acid to a concentration of 0.05 M. The length of the lines shows a correlation between original data and factor axes.