| Literature DB >> 35566078 |
Daisuke Watase1, Shuichi Setoguchi1, Nami Nagata-Akaho1, Shotaro Goto1, Hirofumi Yamakawa1, Ayano Yamada1, Mitsuhisa Koga1, Yoshiharu Karube1, Kazuhisa Matsunaga1, Jiro Takata1.
Abstract
The intestinal absorption of hydrophobic compounds is severely influenced by their transportation rate through the unstirred water layer in the intestinal lumen. A member of the vitamin E family, α-Tocotrienol (α-T3) has remarkable pharmacological effects, but its intestinal absorption is hampered due to its hydrophobicity. Here, we prepared three ester derivatives of 2R-α-T3, and we selected a suitable prodrug compound using rat plasma and liver microsomes. The micellization profile of the selected compound in the presence of taurocholic acid (TCA) was evaluated. After gastrostomy administration of the prodrug candidate or α-T3 solution containing TCA, AUC values were determined for α-T3 in plasma obtained from bile duct-ligated rats. Among the three types in the efficiency of the reconversion to the parent drug, α-T3 N,N-dimethylglycinate (α-T3DMG) was the best prodrug; α-T3DMG formed mixed micelles via ion pairs with anionic TCA. The solubility of α-T3DMG in n-octanol/water depended on its ratio to TCA. The AUC after α-T3DMG administration to ligated rats was 2-fold higher than that after α-T3 administration, suggesting a smooth interaction with intrinsic bile acids. In conclusion, utilization of the prodrug synthesized using N,N-dimethylglycine ester may be a beneficial approach to promote intestinal absorption of α-T3 via self-micellization with intrinsic bile acid.Entities:
Keywords: bile acid; bioavailability; drug delivery system; micelle; prodrug; tocotrienol; vitamin E
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35566078 PMCID: PMC9102404 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092727
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Chemical structures of 2R-α-Tocotrienol (α-T3) derivatives.
Kinetic parameters for hydrolysis of α-T3DMG, α-T3MG, and α-T3Suc in rat plasma and liver microsome at pH 7.4 and 37 °C.
| Compound | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rat plasma | |||
| α-T3MG | 1.460 | 0.5573 | 0.3817 |
| α-T3DMG | 0.6641 | 0.08138 | 0.1225 |
| α-T3Suc | 1.291 | 0.1033 | 0.08002 |
| Rat liver microsome | |||
| α-T3MG | 0.1765 | 2.051 | 11.62 |
| α-T3DMG | 5.723 | 139.5 | 24.38 |
| α-T3Suc | 0.06162 | 0.07426 | 1.205 |
The values are obtained from a Michaelis–Menten curve fitting (GraphPad Prism).
Figure 2Distribution of α-T3DMG to n-octanol and water phases. α-T3DMG concentrations in the test solutions are (A) 2.94 mmol/L, (B) 5.88 mmol/L, (C) 11.76 mmol/L, and (D) 23.52 mmol/L. The values indicate mean ± SD (n = 3). The actual concentrations of TCA are summarized in Table 4 in the method Section 4.7.1.
Figure 3Appearance of aqueous solutions of α-T3DMG with or without TCA. α-T3DMG concentrations in the test solutions are (A) 2.94 mmol/L, (B) 5.88 mmol/L, (C) 11.76 mmol/L, and (D) 23.52 mmol/L.
Figure 4Phase diagram of solubility of α-T3DMG in the presence of TCA. The gray area covers the points examined in this study. The yellow area indicates ion-pair complex between α-T3DMG and TCA, obtained from the data as solubility saturation of α-T3DMG in octanol phase or precipitation in water in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
Physicochemical property of the particles in the aqueous solutions of α-T3DMG with or without TCA.
| Molar Ratio of TCA vs. α-T3DMG (X). | logX | pH | Z-Average (nm) | PDI | Z-Potential (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.88 mmol/L α-T3DMG | |||||
| 0 | - | 3.0 | 282.0 ± 8.9 | 0.542 ± 0.034 | 95.4 ± 2.5 |
| 0.3 | −0.52 | 3.2 | 12.6 ± 0.2 | 0.428 ± 0.014 | 48.3 ± 7.5 |
| 0.9 | −0.05 | 3.8 | 3.8 ± 1.1 | 0.228 ± 0.039 | 19.1 ± 12.2 |
| 1 | 0 | 3.8 | 5.3 ± 3.5 | 0.203 ± 0.064 | 8.70 ± 6.17 |
| 1.5 | 0.18 | 4.1 | 3.1 ± 0.0 | 0.161 ± 0.045 | −4.35 ± 1.99 |
| 3 | 0.48 | 4.6 | 4.3 ± 1.8 | 0.217 ± 0.009 | −0.0299 ± 0.260 |
| 4 | 0.60 | 4.7 | 163.7 ± 84.5 a | 0.466 ± 0.068 | −22.1 ± 3.37 |
| 23.52 mmol/L α-T3DMG | |||||
| 0 | - | 2.7 | 307.8 ± 8.6 | 0.490 ± 0.020 | no data |
| 0.3 | −0.52 | 3.5 | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 0.336 ± 0.026 | |
| 0.9 | −0.05 | 3.9 | 4.2 ± 0.4 b | 0.286 ± 0.231 a | |
| 1 | 0 | 3.9 | 3185 ± 327 b | 0.250 ± 0.179 a | |
| 1.5 | 0.18 | 4.4 | 9.2 ± 6.1 | 0.190 ± 0.045 | |
| 3 | 0.48 | 4.8 | 22.4 ± 15.1 | 0.219 ± 0.051 | |
| 4 | 0.60 | 4.8 | 23.7 ± 12.2 | 0.217 ± 0.005 | |
a Ambiguous data because all the observed peaks of diameter are <100 nm and the test solutions are completely transparent. b Ambiguous data due to occurring precipitation of the component as shown in Figure 3B.
Figure 5Plasma concentration of α-T3 after gastrostomy administration of α-T3DMG with TCA in bile duct-ligated rats. Closed circle, 5.88 mmol/L α-T3DMG and 5.88 mmol/L TCA in water (α-T3DMG:TCA = 1:1); open triangle, 5.88 mmol/L α-T3DMG and 11.76 mmol/L TCA in water (α-T3DMG:TCA = 1:2). The doses are 12.5 mg/kg of weight equivalent for α-T3. The values indicate mean ± SD (n = 3).
Pharmacokinetic parameters for α-T3 after gastrostomy administration of α-T3DMG in bile duct-ligated rats.
| Parameter | α-T3DMG:TCA = 1:1 | α-T3DMG:TCA = 1:2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0.432 ± 0.150 | 0.913 ± 0.289 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 5.615 ± 1.055 * | 10.477 ± 3.789 * | |
| 9.40 ± 0.46 | 12.8 ± 6.18 |
Values are presented as mean ± SD. The X value indicates TCA molar ratio of TCA to α-T3DMG. * p < 0.05; unpaired t-test.
Composition of the mixture solutions containing α-T3DMG with or without TCA.
| α-T3DMG | TCA Concentration (mmol/L) | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.94 | 0 | 0.29 | 0.59 | 0.88 | 1.18 | 1.47 | 1.76 | 2.06 | 2.35 | 2.65 | 2.94 | 3.23 | 3.53 | 3.82 | 4.12 | 4.41 | 4.70 | 5.88 | 8.82 | 11.8 |
| 5.88 | 0 | 0.59 | 1.18 | 1.76 | 2.35 | 2.94 | 3.53 | 4.12 | 4.70 | 5.29 | 5.88 | 6.47 | 7.06 | 7.64 | 8.23 | 8.82 | 9.41 | 11.8 | 17.6 | 23.5 |
| 11.8 | 0 | 1.18 | 2.35 | 3.53 | 4.70 | 5.88 | 7.06 | 8.23 | 9.41 | 10.6 | 11.8 | 12.9 | 14.1 | 15.3 | 16.5 | 17.6 | 18.8 | 23.5 | 35.3 | 47.0 |
| 23.5 | 0 | 2.35 | 4.70 | 7.06 | 9.41 | 11.8 | 14.1 | 16.5 | 18.8 | 21.2 | 23.5 | 25.9 | 28.2 | 30.6 | 32.9 | 35.3 | 37.6 | 40.0 | 70.6 | 94.1 |
| Molar ratio of TCA vs α-T3DMG (: X) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| Log X | ||||||||||||||||||||
| - | −1.00 | −0.70 | −0.52 | −0.40 | −0.30 | −0.22 | −0.15 | −0.10 | −0.05 | 0 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.48 | 0.60 | |