| Literature DB >> 35566027 |
Anca Suteanu-Simulescu1,2,3, Alina Diana Zamfir4,5, Raluca Ica4,6, Mirela Sarbu4, Cristian V A Munteanu7, Florica Gadalean1,2,3, Adrian Vlad3,8,9, Flaviu Bob1,2,3, Dragos Catalin Jianu3,10,11,12, Ligia Petrica1,2,3,10.
Abstract
Considering the valuable information provided by glycosphingolipids as molecular markers and the limited data available for their detection and characterization in patients suffering from Type 2 diabetic kidney disease (DKD), we developed and implemented a superior method based on high-resolution (HR) mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem MS (MS/MS) for the determination of gangliosides in the urine of DKD patients. This study was focused on: (i) testing of the HR MS and MS/MS feasibility and performances in mapping and sequencing of renal gangliosides in Type 2 DM patients; (ii) determination of the changes in the urine gangliosidome of DKD patients in different stages of the disease-normo-, micro-, and macroalbuminuria-in a comparative assay with healthy controls. Due to the high resolution and mass accuracy, the comparative MS screening revealed that the sialylation status of the ganglioside components; their modification by O-acetyl, CH3COO-, O-fucosyl, and O-GalNAc; as well as the composition of the ceramide represent possible markers for early DKD detection, the assessment of disease progression, and follow-up treatment. Moreover, structural investigation by MS/MS demonstrated that GQ1d(d18:1/18:0), GT1α(d18:1/18:0) and GT1b(d18:1/18:0) isomers are associated with macroalbuminuria, meriting further investigation in relation to their role in DKD.Entities:
Keywords: diabetic kidney disease; fragmentation analysis; ganglioside biomarkers; high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry; nanoelectrospray; screening
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35566027 PMCID: PMC9103338 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092679
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Ganglioside species identified in A1, A3, and C samples by (-) nanoESI Orbitrap MS screening. d: dihydroxylated sphingoid base; t: trihydroxylated sphingoid base.
| No. | Proposed Structure | Molecular Ion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GM2(d18:1/22:2) | 477.6110 | [M-3H+]3− | 477.6100 | - | - |
| 2 | GQ1(d18:1/16:0) | 596.7751 | [M-4H+]4− | - | - | 596.7748 |
| 3 | GQ1(d18:1/22:0) | 617.7992 | [M-4H+]4− | - | - | 617.7979 |
| 4 | GM3(d18:0/24:0) | 645.3958 | [M-H2O-4H++2Na+]2− | - | 645.3956 | - |
| 5 | GP1(d18:1/18:0) | 676.5571 | [M-4H+]4− | 676.5569 | - | - |
| 6 | GT1(d18:0/16:0) | 699.0040 | [M-3H+]3− | - | - | 699.0037 |
| 7 | GT1(d18:1/18:0) | 708.3382 | [M-3H+]3− | - | 708.3379 | - |
| 8 | GT1(d18:1/18:1) | 707.6681 | [M-3H+]3− | 707.6684 | - | 707.6684 |
| 9 | GT1(t18:0/18:0) | 714.3514 | [M-3H+]3− | 714.3513 | - | 714.3513 |
| 10 | GT1(d18:1/20:0) | 717.0221 | [M-3H+]3− | - | - | 717.0220 |
| 11 | GT1(d18:0/20:0) | 718.3636 | [M-3H+]3− | - | 718.3637 | - |
| 12 | GT1(t18:0/20:0) | 723.6952 | [M-3H+]3− | 723.6949 | - | - |
| 13 | GD3(d18:1/18:1) | 733.9043 | [M-2H+]2− | 733.9038 | - | - |
| 14 | GD3(d18:1/18:0) | 735.9199 | [M-2H+]2− | 735.9195 | - | - |
| 15 | GT1(t18:1/24:3) | 739.6953 | [M-3H+]3− | - | 739.6950 | - |
| 16 | GD3(d18:1/20:1) | 747.9199 | [M-2H+]2− | - | 747.9195 | - |
| 17 | GM1(d18:1/16:1) | 756.9070 | [M-2H+]2− | - | 756.9078 | - |
| 18 | GQ1(d18:1/18:0) | 812.7072 | [M-4H++Na+]3− | - | 812.7068 | - |
| 19 | GQ1(d18:1/20:0) | 814.7253 | [M-3H+]3− | 814.7248 | - | - |
| 20 | 819.3803 | [M-3H+]3− | - | 819.3809 | - | |
| 21 | GQ1(d18:1/22:2) | 830.0509 | [M-4H++Na+]3− | - | 830.0504 | - |
| 22 | GD2(d18:1/18:0) | 847.4427 | [M-3H++Na+]2− | - | 847.4421 | - |
| 23 | GT3(d18:1/18:0) | 891.4508 | [M-3H++Na+]2− | - | - | 891.4503 |
| 24 | GD1(d18:1/16:0) | 903.4623 | [M-2H+]2− | 903.4616 | 903.4616 | |
| 25 | Fuc-GT3(t18:1/18:3) | 969.4538 | [M-3H++Na+]2− | - | 969.4534 | - |
| 26 | GT2(d18:0/16:0) | 979.9865 | [M-3H++Na+]2− | - | - | 979.9861 |
| 27 | Fuc-(CH3COO)GD1(d18:0/16:0) | 1007.5125 | [M-2H+]2− | - | - | 1007.5118 |
| 28 | GT1(d18:1/16:0) | 1059.9997 | [M-3H++Na+]2− | - | 1059.9988 | - |
| 29 | GT1(d18:1/18:0) | 1063.0263 | [M-2H+]2− | - | 1063.0260 | - |
| 30 | GT1(d18:1/18:0) | 1085.0084 | [M-4H++2Na+]2− | - | - | 1085.0077 |
| 31 | GT1(d18:1/22:0) | 1091.0573 | [M-2H+]2- | - | - | 1091.0560 |
| 32 | 1129.0721 | [M-H2O-3H++Na+]2− | 1129.0652 | 1129.0649 | - | |
| 33 | GalNAc-GS1(t18:1/18:0) | 1176.8277 | [M-4H++Na+]3− | - | 1176.8266 | - |
| 34 | GQ1(d18:1/18:0) | 1219.5657 | [M-3H++Na+]2− | 1219.5639 | - | - |
| 35 | GQ1(d20:1/18:0) | 1244.5711 | [M-4H++2Na+]2− | - | 1244.5669 | - |
| 36 | Fuc-GT1(d18:0/24:0) | 1179.1103 | [M-2H+]2− | - | 1179.1094 | - |
| 37 | GalNAc-GQ1(d18:1/18:0) | 1310.1289 | [M-2H+]2− | - | 1310.1271 | - |
Tabulated view of the identified urine ganglioside classes together with their differential expression in A1, A3, and C samples. Symbols: x = the class was detected; - = the class was not detected.
| Ganglioside Class | A1 | A3 | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| GM1 | - | x | - |
| GM2 | x | - | - |
| GM3 | - | x | - |
| GD1 | - | x | x |
| GD2 | - | x | - |
| GD3 | x | x | - |
| GT1 | x | x | x |
| GT2 | - | - | x |
| GT3 | - | - | x |
| GQ1 | x | x | x |
| GS1 | - | x | - |
| GP1 | x | - | - |
| x | x | - | |
| Fuc-modified species | - | x | - |
| Fuc-CH3COO-modified species | - | - | x |
| GalNAc-modified species | - | x | - |
Figure 1Pie charts representing the ganglioside classes and their proportions in (a) A1, (b) A3, and (c) C samples.
Figure 2Histogram comparatively plotting the number of ganglioside species in A1, A3, and C vs. their glycan chain composition.
Figure 3The five most common isomers of GQ1(d18:1/18:0): (A) GQ1a(d18:1/18:0) isomer; (B) GQ1b(d18:1/18:0) isomer; (C) GQ1c(d18:1/18:0)isomer; (D) GQ1d(d18:1/18:0) isomer; (E) GQ1e(d18:1/18:0) isomer.
Figure 4Structural analysis by (−) nanoESI HR HCD MS/MS of the [M-4H++Na+]3− precursor ion detected in the A3 sample at m/z 812.7068, which, according to mass calculation, corresponds to GQ1(d18:1/18:0). Acquisition time: 2 min; variable collision energies within 30–80 eV.
Figure 5Scheme of the fragmentation by HCD MS/MS experienced by the [M-4H++Na+]3− precursor at m/z 812.7068 and the sequence ions diagnostic for the GQ1d structural isomer.
Figure 6Structural analysis by (−) nanoESI HR HCD MS/MS of the [M-3H+]3− precursor ion detected in the A3 sample at m/z 708.3379, which, according to mass calculation, corresponds to GT1(d18:1/18:0). Acquisition time: 2 min; variable collision energies within 30–80 eV. Inset: the structure of GT1b(d18:1/18:0) isomer deduced from the MS/MS data.
Figure 7Scheme of the fragmentation experienced by the GT1 (d18:1/18:0) and the sequence ions diagnostic for the structure of GT1b isomer.
Assignment of the fragment ions detected in the negative ion MS/MS of the precursor molecular ion at m/z 708.3379 corresponding to GT1(d18:1/18:0) ganglioside marker in the A3 sample.
| No. | Type of Fragment Ions | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Y0 | 564.5353 |
| 2. | Y1 | 726.5879 |
| 3. | C3α | 673.2298 |
| 4. | C2α | 470.1509 |
| 5. | Y2α | 734.5701 |
| 6. | B3α | 657.7908 |
| 7. | B1β or B1α | 290.0877 |
| 8. | Z3β(doubly deprotonated) | 908.4721 |
| 9. | C1β or C1α | 308.2954 |
| 10. | B2β | 581.1828 |
| 11. | Y2α/B2β | 888.6405 |
| 12. | Y2β | 1544.8670 |
| 13. | Z3α | 1674.6733 |