| Literature DB >> 35565537 |
Rebekah L McMurray1, M Elizabeth E Ball2, Mark Linton3, Laurette Pinkerton3, Carmel Kelly3, Jonathan Lester4, Caroline Donaldson4, Igori Balta3, Michael M Tunney5, Nicolae Corcionivoschi3, Chen Situ6.
Abstract
Poultry farming is growing globally, particularly in developing countries, to meet the demands of growing populations for poultry meat and eggs. This is likely to lead to an increase in the use of antibiotics in poultry feed, thus contributing to the development and spread of antibiotic resistance which, poses a serious threat to human and animal health worldwide. One way of reducing this threat is to reduce the use of antibiotics in poultry production by finding effective and sustainable antibiotic alternatives that can be used to support poultry health and productivity. Therefore, this study evaluates the incorporation of three medicinal plants, Anemone chinensis Bunge, Smilax glabra Roxb, and Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb, in poultry feed on production performance, nutrient digestibility, and bacteria in the chicken caecum in a 35-day performance trial with 420-day-old male Ross 308 broilers. Groups of randomly selected chicks received one of six dietary treatments. These included five experimental diets of reduced nutrient specifications as a negative control (NC); with amoxicillin as a positive antibiotic control (PC1); with A. pilosa Ledeb (NC1); with A. chinensis Bunge (NC2); and with S. glabra Roxb (NC3). One other positive control diet contained the recommended nutrient specification (PC2). Weight gain and feed intake were measured weekly and used to calculate the feed conversion ratio as performance parameters. Bacteria were enumerated from chicken caecum using a traditional plating method and selective agar. S. glabra Roxb and A. chinensis Bunge showed comparable effects to amoxicillin with significantly increased weight gain in birds offered these diets, compared to those offered the negative control from days 0 to 35 (p < 0.001). S. glabra Roxb exhibited effects similar to the amoxicillin control group with an improved feed conversion ratio (p < 0.001). In addition, S. glabra Roxb decreased numbers of E. coli and Campylobacter spp. on days 21 (p < 0.05) and 35 (p < 0.01) and increased numbers of lactic acid bacteria comparable to the antibiotic group on days 14 (p < 0.001) and 35 (p < 0.01). The findings of this in vivo trial highlight the potential of S. glabra Roxb and A. chinensis Bunge as beneficial feed material to promote poultry health and productivity in the absence of antibiotics.Entities:
Keywords: Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb; Anemone chinensis Bunge; and Smilax glabra Roxb; broiler chickens; lactic acid bacteria; performance; plants
Year: 2022 PMID: 35565537 PMCID: PMC9105906 DOI: 10.3390/ani12091110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Composition (g/kg) of the experimental treatment diets.
| Feed Ingredient | Starter (0–14 d) | Grower/Finisher (14–35 d) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | NC | NC1 | NC2 | NC3 | PC1 | PC2 | NC | NC1 | NC2 | NC3 | |
| Wheat | 640 | 650 | 640 | 619 | 619 | 619 | 626 | 678 | 626 | 612 | 612 | 612 |
| Wheat pollard | 50 | 0 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Rapeseed meal | 30 | 0 | 30 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Soybean meal 48 | 214 | 252 | 214 | 220 | 220 | 220 | 180 | 180 | 180 | 195 | 195 | 195 |
| Full fat soya | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Soy oil | 20 | 30 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Salt | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sodium bicarbonate | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| DL methionine | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| Lysine HCl | 3.7 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
| Threonine | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| Limestone | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Mono-dicalcium phosphate | 9.5 | 10 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.4 | 7.4 | 7.4 |
| Vitamin premix * | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| Titanium dioxide | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Amoxicillin 10 mg/kg | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 | |
PC1 = positive control 1 (NC + 40mg/kg amoxicillin); PC2 = positive control 2 (recommended nutrient specification); NC = negative control (reduced nutrient specification); NC1 = NC + herb of A. pilosa Ledeb; NC2 = NC + herb of A. chinensis Bunge; and NC3 = NC + tuber of S. glabra Roxb. * Starter supplied per tonne of diet: vitamin A 10MIU; vitamin D3 5MIU; vitamin E 100 g; vitamin K 4 g; thiamine (B1) 3 g; riboflavin (B2) 6 g; pyridoxine 5 g; vitamin B12 27.5 mg; biotin (2.5%) 0.25 g; calcium pantothenate 12.5 g; nicotinic 45 g; folic acid 1.5 g; iodate-calcium 2 g; selenite-sodium 0.25 g; iron sulphate 45 g; molybdate-sodium 0.5 g; manganese oxide 90 g; copper sulphate 15 g; zinc oxide 90 g; betaine 500 g; optiphos 5000 25 g; and hostazyme 50 g.
Formulated analysis of the treatment diets (digestible amino acids) (fresh basis).
| Nutrient (g/kg) | Starter (0–14 d) | Grower/Finisher (14–35 d) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | NC | NC1 | NC2 | NC3 | PC1 | PC2 | NC | NC1 | NC2 | NC3 | |
| Dry matter | 879 | 879 | 878 | 889 | 886 | 883 | 891 | 887 | 892 | 895 | 893 | 914 |
| Crude protein | 209 | 219 | 209 | 209 | 209 | 208 | 194 | 202 | 194 | 196 | 196 | 195 |
| Metabolisable energy MJ/kg | 12.84 | 13.17 | 12.84 | 12.89 | 12.87 | 12.88 | 13.17 | 13.56 | 13.17 | 13.30 | 13.29 | 13.30 |
| Calcium | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 9.5 | 7.9 | 7.8 | 7.9 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Phosphorus | 6.9 | 7.0 | 6.9 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| Available phosphorus | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Crude fat | 35.3 | 47.6 | 35.3 | 35.3 | 35.3 | 35.0 | 44.8 | 54.0 | 44.8 | 41.9 | 41.9 | 41.6 |
| Crude fibre | 27.1 | 25.0 | 27.1 | 33.3 | 31.9 | 31.4 | 26.1 | 25.7 | 26.1 | 31.0 | 29.7 | 29.2 |
| Methionine | 5.1 | 5.2 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Cysteine | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Methionine + cysteine | 9.0 | 9.1 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 8.9 | 8.4 | 8.6 | 8.4 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Lysine | 12.5 | 12.9 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 12.4 | 11.0 | 11.3 | 11.0 | 11.1 | 11.0 | 11.0 |
| Histidine | 5.1 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Tryptophan | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 |
| Threonine | 8.4 | 8.6 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.3 | 7.9 | 8.2 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Arginine | 12.6 | 13.6 | 12.6 | 12.6 | 12.6 | 12.6 | 11.4 | 12.2 | 11.4 | 11.7 | 11.7 | 11.7 |
| Isoleucine | 8.0 | 8.7 | 8.0 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 8.0 | 7.3 | 7.8 | 7.3 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Leucine | 14.7 | 15.7 | 14.7 | 14.7 | 14.7 | 14.6 | 13.5 | 14.3 | 13.5 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 13.7 |
| Phenylalanine | 9.6 | 10.3 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 9.6 | 8.8 | 9.5 | 8.8 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Tyrosine | 6.7 | 7.2 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.7 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 6.2 |
| Valine | 9.2 | 9.7 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 9.1 | 8.5 | 8.9 | 8.5 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Glycine | 8.4 | 8.8 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.4 | 8.3 | 7.7 | 8.1 | 7.7 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 7.7 |
| Serine | 9.4 | 10.1 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 8.6 | 9.2 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| Phenylalanine + tyrosine | 16.2 | 17.5 | 16.2 | 16.3 | 16.3 | 16.2 | 14.9 | 16.0 | 14.9 | 15.2 | 15.3 | 15.2 |
PC1 = positive control 1 (NC + 40 mg/kg amoxicillin); PC2 = positive control 2 (recommended nutrient specification); NC = negative control (reduced nutrient specification); NC1 = NC + herb of A. pilosa Ledeb; NC2 = NC + herb of A. chinensis Bunge; and NC3 = NC + tuber of S. glabra Roxb.
Nutritional composition of the dried plants as they arrived commercially dried.
| Nutritional Compound | Total Composition g/kg | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude protein (N × 6.25) (Dumas) | 72 | 46 | 91 |
| Crude fibre | 349 | 258 | 280 |
| Ash | 70 | 20 | 120 |
| Total oil (oil B) | 19 | 4.2 | 20.1 |
| Alanin | 3.0 | 0.9 | 3.9 |
| Arginine | 3.2 | 4.4 | 4.0 |
| Aspartic acid | 6.7 | 2.7 | 9.3 |
| Cysteine | 0.8 | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| Glutamic acid | 6.8 | 2.9 | 8.9 |
| Glycine | 3.4 | 1.4 | 4.1 |
| Histidine | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 |
| Iso-leucine | 2.9 | 1.0 | 3.8 |
| Leucine | 5.0 | 1.7 | 6.5 |
| Lysine | 3.6 | 1.5 | 4.0 |
| Methionine | 1.3 | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| Phenylalanine | 3.5 | 1.1 | 4.1 |
| Proline | 2.8 | 1.1 | 4.4 |
| Serine | 3.1 | 1.6 | 3.9 |
| Threonine | 3.0 | 1.4 | 3.8 |
| Tyrosine | 1.9 | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| Valine | 0.36 | 0.15 | 0.46 |
| Tryptophan | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.11 |
| Gross energy (MJ/kg) | 16.32 | 16.04 | 15.50 |
PC1 = positive control 1 (NC + 40 mg/kg amoxicillin); PC2 = positive control 2 (recommended nutrient specification); NC = negative control (reduced nutrient specification); NC1 = NC + herb of A. pilosa Ledeb; NC2 = NC + herb of A. chinensis Bunge; and NC3 = NC + tuber of S. glabra Roxb.
The effect of the plant materials on feed intake (FI), weight gain (WG), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) from 0 to 35 days of age.
| Day | Parameter | Treatment | SEM | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC1 | PC2 | NC | NC1 | NC2 | NC3 | ||||
| 0–14 | FI (g) | 581.2 bc | 510.0 a | 542.8 ab | 551.9 ab | 605.8 c | 571.9 bc | 16.72 | <0.01 |
| WG (g) | 493.8 b | 433.0 a | 437.6 a | 465.5 ab | 483.0 b | 460.3 ab | 10.85 | <0.01 | |
| FCR | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.24 | 1.19 | 1.25 | 1.24 | 0.024 | NS | |
| 14–35 | FI (g) | 2624.6 a | 2562.3 a | 2540.1 a | 2465.6 a | 2856.2 b | 2626.1 ab | 81.72 | <0.05 |
| WG (g) | 1737.7 b | 1556.6 a | 1450.1 a | 1566.1 a | 1757.6 b | 1776.4 b | 39.13 | <0.001 | |
| FCR | 1.51a | 1.65 bc | 1.75 c | 1.58 ab | 1.63 b | 1.48 a | 0.035 | <0.001 | |
| 0–35 | FI (g) | 3205.9 ab | 3072.3 a | 3082.9 a | 3017.5 a | 3462.0 b | 3197.7 a | 86.99 | <0.05 |
| WG (g) | 2231.5 b | 1989.6 ab | 1887.7 a | 2031.6b | 2240.6 b | 2236.7 b | 41.96 | <0.001 | |
| FCR | 1.44 a | 1.54 b | 1.63 c | 1.49 ab | 1.55 b | 1.43 a | 0.027 | <0.001 | |
| 0 | Live weight (g) | 44.14 | 43.82 | 43.8 | 43.42 | 44.46 | 43.54 | 0.385 | NS |
| 14 | 538.0 c | 476.8 a | 481.4 a | 508.9 abc | 527.5 bc | 503.8 ab | 10.94 | <0.01 | |
| 35 | 2275.7 b | 2033.4 ab | 1931.5 a | 2075.0 b | 2285.0 c | 2280.2 c | 41.95 | <0.001 | |
Means without common superscripts (abc) indicate the significant differences between the treatments (rows). PC1 = positive control 1 (NC + 40 mg/kg amoxicillin); PC2 = positive control 2 (recommended nutrient specification); NC = negative control (reduced nutrient specification); NC1 = NC + herb of A. pilosa Ledeb; NC2 = NC + herb of A. chinensis Bunge; and NC3 = NC + tuber of S. glabra Roxb. NS = non-significant (p > 0.05).
The effect of the plant materials on the litter characteristics at different stages of production.
| Day | Parameter | PC1 | PC2 | NC | NC1 | NC2 | NC3 | SEM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Ammonia dosi (ppm) | 11.7 | 10.8 | 11.3 | 18.9 | 10.3 | 13.10 | 3.423 | NS |
| pH | 8.24 | 8.02 | 7.88 | 7.74 | 8.025 | 8.040 | 0.408 | NS | |
| Moisture content (%) | 39.7 | 41.7 | 43.1 | 39.6 | 38.0 | 37.8 | 4.13 | NS | |
| 27 | Ammonia dosi (ppm) | 15.5 | 26.0 | 9.5 | 21.0 | 21.0 | 19.00 | 6.24 | NS |
| Ammonia monitor (ppm) | 9.7 | 7.0 | 8.8 | 19.0 | 9.7 | 13.78 | 5.909 | NS | |
| pH | 8.12 | 7.58 | 8.64 | 8.24 | 7.64 | 8.340 | 0.314 | NS | |
| Moisture content (%) | 48.6 | 51.7 | 45.4 | 52.2 | 51.2 | 50.5 | 4.37 | NS | |
| 34 | Ammonia dosi (ppm) | 42.0 | 53.5 | 47.5 | 64.0 | 40.5 | 50.0 | 14.08 | NS |
| Ammonia monitor (ppm) | 20.1 | 27.8 | 25.1 | 28.8 | 21.7 | 21.3 | 4.82 | NS | |
| pH | 6.56 a | 7.48 ab | 8.34 bc | 8.76 c | 7.14 a | 8.50 bc | 0.351 | <0.001 | |
| Moisture content (%) | 55.0 | 62.70 | 56.0 | 62.8 | 61.7 | 61.0 | 3.03 | NS |
Means without common superscripts (abc) indicate the significant differences between the treatments (rows). PC1 = positive control 1 (NC+40mg/kg amoxicillin); PC2 = positive control 2 (recommended nutrient specification); NC = negative control (reduced nutrient specification); NC1 = NC + herb of A. pilosa Ledeb; NC2 = NC + herb of A. chinensis Bunge; and NC3 = NC + tuber of S. glabra Roxb. NS = non-significant (p > 0.05).
The effect of the plant materials on the apparent ileal digestibility (%).
| Digestibility | PC1 | PC2 | NC | NC1 | NC2 | NC3 | SEM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry matter (%) | 66 a | 79 b | 66 a | 70 a | 67 a | 70 a | 0.022 | <0.01 |
| Ash (%) | 24 a | 53 c | 48 c | 38 b | 57 c | 36 b | 0.035 | <0.001 |
| Crude protein (%) | 76 | 83 | 73 | 79 | 76 | 77 | 0.022 | NS |
Means without common superscripts (abc) indicate the significant differences between the treatments (rows). PC1 = positive control 1 (NC + 40 mg/kg amoxicillin); PC2 = positive control 2 (recommended nutrient specification); NC = negative control (reduced nutrient specification); NC1 = NC + herb of A. pilosa Ledeb; NC2 = NC + herb of A. chinensis Bunge; and NC3 = NC + tuber of S. glabra Roxb. NS = non-significant (p > 0.05).
Figure 1The effect of the plant materials on the bacterial load of Campylobacter spp. in the caecum from 7 to 35 days of age. Means without common superscripts (ab) indicate the significant differences (*, p < 0.05)between the treatments. PC1 = positive control 1 (NC+40mg/kg amoxicillin); PC2 = positive control 2 (recommended nutrient specification); NC = negative control (reduced nutrient specification); NC1 = NC + herb of A. pilosa Ledeb; NC2 = NC + herb of A. chinensis Bunge; and NC3 = NC + tuber of S. glabra Roxb.
Figure 2The effect of the plant materials on the bacterial load of E. coli in the caecum from 7 to 35 days of age. Means without common superscripts (ab) indicate the significant differences (*, p < 0.05) between the treatments. PC1 = positive control 1 (NC + 40mg/kg amoxicillin); PC2 = positive control 2 (recommended nutrient specification); NC = negative control (reduced nutrient specification); NC1 = NC + herb of A. pilosa Ledeb; NC2 = NC + herb of A. chinensis Bunge; and NC3 = NC + tuber of S. glabra Roxb.
The effects of the treatment groups on the caecum lactic acid bacteria bacterial load at 14 and 35 days of age.
| Treatment Group | Day | |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | 35 | |
| Lactic Acid Bacteria (log10 CFU g−1) | ||
| PC1 | 3.68 a | 7.80 a |
| PC2 | 9.16 b | 8.65 ab |
| NC | 10.05 b | 9.30 c |
| NC1 | 9.69 b | 8.61 ab |
| NC2 | 9.54 b | 8.93 b |
| NC3 | 9.40 b | 9.64 c |
| SEM | 0.339 | 0.308 |
| <0.001 | <0.01 | |
Means without common superscripts (abc) indicate the significant differences between the treatments (rows). PC1 = positive control 1 (NC + 40 mg/kg amoxicillin); PC2 = positive control 2 (recommended nutrient specification); NC = negative control (reduced nutrient specification); NC1 = NC + herb of A. pilosa Ledeb; NC2 = NC + herb of A. chinensis Bunge; and NC3 = NC + tuber of S. glabra Roxb.