| Literature DB >> 35565436 |
Marta Łukaszewicz-Zając1, Sara Pączek2, Barbara Mroczko1,3.
Abstract
The global burden of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers is expected to increase. Therefore, it is vital that novel biomarkers useful for the early diagnosis of these malignancies are established. A growing body of data has linked secretion of proteolytic enzymes, such as metalloproteinases (MMPs), which destroy the extracellular matrix, to pathogenesis of GI tumours. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase (ADAM) proteins belong to the MMP family but have been proven to be unique due to both proteolytic and adhesive properties. Recent investigations have demonstrated that the expression of several ADAMs is upregulated in GI cancer cells. Thus, the objective of this review is to present current findings concerning the role of ADAMs in the pathogenesis of GI cancers, particularly their involvement in the development and progression of colorectal, pancreatic and gastric cancer. Furthermore, the prognostic significance of selected ADAMs in patients with GI tumours is also presented. It has been proven that ADAM8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 17 and 28 might stimulate the proliferation and invasion of GI malignancies and may be associated with unfavourable survival. In conclusion, this review confirms the role of selected ADAMs in the pathogenesis of the most common GI cancers and indicates their promising significance as potential prognostic biomarkers as well as therapeutic targets for GI malignancies. However, due to their non-specific nature, future research on ADAM biology should be performed to elucidate new strategies for the diagnosis of these common and deadly malignancies and treatment of patients with these diseases.Entities:
Keywords: ADAM; biomarker; gastrointestinal tumours
Year: 2022 PMID: 35565436 PMCID: PMC9101749 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.575
Figure 1Structure of ADAMs of transmembrane and soluble ADAMs [30,31,32].
Characteristics of selected ADAMs [32].
| ADAMs | Other Name | Involvement in Cancer Biology | Inhibitors |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADAM8 | MS2 (CD156) | Promotion of migration | - |
| ADAM9 | MDC9, MCMP, Meltrin-γ | Promotion of cell adhesion and invasion, binding to integrins (α6β4 and α2β1) | - |
| ADAM10 | MDAM, Kuzbanian | Type I membrane glycoprotein L1 shedding, promotion of cell growth and migration | TIMP1 |
| ADAM12 | Meltrin-α, MCMP, MLTN, MLTNA | HB-EGF (heparin-binding epidermal growth factor) shedding, promotion of cell growth | TIMP3 |
| ADAM15 | Metargidin, MDC15, AD56, CR II-7 | Promotion of cell growth | No data |
| ADAM17 | TACE, cSVP | TGF-β (transforming growth factor) shedding, promotion of cell growth | TIMP2 |
| ADAM19 | Meltrin-β, FKSG34 | No data | - |
| ADAM28 | e-MDC II, MDC-Lm, MDC-Ls | IGFBP-3 (insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3) cleavage, promotion of cell growth | TIMP3 TIMP4 |
| ADAMTS1 | C3-C5, METH1, KIAA1346 | HB-EGF (heparin-binding epidermal growth factor) and AR shedding, promotion of cell growth, survival and invasion | No data |
| ADAMTS4 | KIAA0688, aggrecanase-1, ADMP-1 | No data | TIMP3 |
| ADAMTS5 | ADAMTS11, aggrecanase-2, ADMP-2 | Brevican cleavage, promotion of invasion | TIMP3 |
Figure 2The significance of ADAMs in cancer biology [30,31,32].
The significance of selected ADAMs in GI malignancies.
| ADAMs | GI Cancers | Results | References |
| ADAM8 | GC |
overexpression in GC tissues compared with noncancerous tissues correlation with tumour size (T factor), N (nodal involvement), vessel invasion and shorter survival | [ |
| CRC |
overexpression in CRC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues independent prognostic factor for patient survival | [ | |
| PC |
overexpression in PC compared with normal pancreatic tissues correlation with reduced patient survival | [ | |
| LC |
overexpression in HCC tissues compared with normal liver tissues correlation with higher concentrations of alpha-fetoprotein, tumour stage and size, histological differentiation, tumour recurrence and tumour metastasis independent prognostic factor for patient survival | [ | |
| ADAM9 | GC |
overexpression in GC compared with non-neoplastic foveolar epithelium | [ |
| PC |
overexpression in PC cell lines compared with normal epithelial cells correlation with poor tumour differentiation and worse patient prognosis | [ | |
| Adam10 | GC |
overexpression in GC lesions compared with adjacent non-cancerous tissues correlation with TNM stage, size and location of tumour, depth of invasion, presence of lymph node and distant metastases independent prognostic indicator of GC | [ |
| CRC |
elevated serum concentrations in CRC patients in comparison to healthy controls correlation with clinical stage and histological grade of tumour predictor of tumour progression | [ | |
| HCC |
overexpression correlated with the presence of metastasis, grade, differentiation and size of tumour correlation with reduced patient survival | [ | |
| ADAM12 | GC |
upregulated expression in GC compared with non-neoplastic foveolar epithelium | [ |
| CRC |
serum levels were higher in the sera of CRC patients in comparison to healthy subjects highest concentrations found in advanced stage of CRC | [ | |
| ADAM15 | GC |
upregulated in GC compared with non-neoplastic foveolar epithelium implicated in malignant growth of GC cells | [ |
| CRC |
reduced expression of ADAM15 in cancer cells correlation with histologically poorly differentiated malignancies | [ | |
| PC |
overexpression in PC cells compared with normal pancreatic epithelial cells | [ | |
| ADAM17 | GC |
overexpression promoted migration of GC cells and tumour growth overexpression was associated with advanced TNM stage and presence of lymph node metastasis a significant biomarker for poor prognosis in GC | [ |
| CRC |
decreased serum levels in CRC patients in comparison to healthy controls | [ | |
| ADAM28 | GC |
overexpression in GC cells regulated cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis | [ |
| CRC |
elevated serum levels in CRC patients in comparison to healthy subjects correlation with clinical TNM stage, presence of distant metastases (M factor) and histopathological grading (G factor) | [ |