| Literature DB >> 35564717 |
Guanwei Zhao1,2, Zhitao Li1, Yuzhen Shang1, Muzhuang Yang1,2.
Abstract
Understanding the effect of the urban built environment on online car-hailing ridership is crucial to urban planning. However, how the effects change with the analysis scales are still noteworthy. Therefore, a multiscale exploratory study was conducted in Chengdu, China, by using the stepwise regression selection and three spatial regression models. The main findings are summarized as follows. First, as the grid size increases, the number of built environment factors that have significant effects on trip intensity decrease continuously. Second, the effects of population density and road density are always positive from the 500 m grid to the 3000 m grid. As the analysis scale increases, the effect of proximity to public transportation shifts from inhibitory to facilitation, while the positive effect of land-use mix becomes stronger. Land-use type has both positive and negative effects and shows different characteristics at different scales. Third, the effects of built environment factors on online car-hailing trip intensity show different spatial variability characteristics at different scales. The effect of population density gradually decreases from north to south. The effect of road network density shows circling and wave patterns, with the former at relatively fine scales and the latter at relatively coarse scales. The spatial variation in the effect of land-use mix can only be observed more significantly at a relatively coarse scale. The effect of bus stop density is only obvious at the relatively fine and medium scales and shows a wave-like pattern and a circle-like pattern. The effect of various land-use types shows different spatial patterns at different scales, including wave-like pattern, circle-like pattern, and multi-core-like pattern. The spatial variation in the effects of various land-use factors gradually decrease with the increase in the analysis scale.Entities:
Keywords: multiscale; online car-hailing; spatial nonstationary; urban built environment
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35564717 PMCID: PMC9105453 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095325
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1The study area map.
The indicators of urban built environment based on “five Ds” principle.
| Features | Main Indicators in Previous Literatures | Indicators in Our Study |
|---|---|---|
| density | population density, employment density | population density (PD) |
| diversity | land-use mix, job–housing imbalance | land-use mix (LM) |
| design | neighborhood, road density, etc. | road density (RD) |
| distance to transit | bus stop density, distance to metro, etc. | bus stop density (BD) |
| different land-use types | − | POI density |
The abbreviations of indicators.
| Indicators in Our Study | Abbreviations |
|---|---|
| population density | PD |
| land-use mix | LM |
| road density | RD |
| bus stop density | BD |
| catering facility density | cat_D |
| scenic spot density | sce_D |
| public service facility density | pub_D |
| company density | com_D |
| shopping facility density | sho_D |
| transportation facility density | tra_D |
| financial facility density | fin_D |
| educational, scientific, and cultural facility density | edu_D |
| residential district density | res_D |
| living service facility density | liv_D |
| sports and leisure facility density | spo_D |
| medical service facility density | med_D |
| government agency density | gov_D |
| accommodation service facility density | acc_D |
The VIF values of initial variables in ten scales.
| Variables | VIF Values in Different Scales | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 m | 1000 m | 1500 m | 2000 m | 2500 m | 3000 m | 3500 m | 4000 m | 4500 m | 5000 m | |
| PD | 1.31 | 1.48 | 1.96 | 2.22 | 2.40 | 3.10 | 3.68 | 6.90 | 1.28 | 6.43 |
| RD | 1.49 | 1.93 | 1.96 | 1.78 | 2.18 | 1.28 | 5.87 | 5.65 | 2810.33 | 2.76 |
| BD | 1.74 | − | 4.14 | 5.36 | 3.53 | 4.85 | 10.41 | 9.21 | 2773.74 | − |
| LM | 1.65 | 1.44 | 1.38 | 1.33 | 1.31 | 1.65 | 2.02 | 1.80 | 2.29 | 1.61 |
| acc_D | 1.45 | 2.20 | 2.62 | 4.28 | 5.10 | 6.54 | 7.59 | 8.85 | 20.04 | 17.24 |
| cat_D | 5.22 | − | 23.32 | 28.28 | 41.87 | 48.72 | 105.02 | 111.09 | 159.23 | − |
| com_D | 1.95 | 2.76 | 3.64 | 4.65 | 4.89 | 7.26 | 9.99 | 11.40 | 14.40 | 33.39 |
| spo_D | 3.27 | 6.75 | 10.51 | 17.64 | 26.85 | 33.58 | 66.73 | 79.37 | 82.84 | 152.48 |
| gov_D | 2.05 | 3.66 | 5.86 | 9.41 | 11.55 | 26.83 | 48.56 | 6.49 | 52.51 | 84.32 |
| fin_D | 3.30 | 6.35 | 11.45 | 18.21 | 17.67 | 28.63 | 58.06 | 50.37 | 71.78 | 49.36 |
| liv_D | 5.51 | 8.60 | 17.83 | 26.38 | 43.15 | 50.57 | 77.50 | 93.28 | 191.42 | 219.01 |
| med_D | 2.55 | 4.84 | 6.43 | 10.94 | 21.78 | 21.32 | 57.37 | 44.59 | 60.18 | 178.04 |
| pub_D | 1.69 | 2.81 | 4.58 | 7.19 | 11.18 | 16.65 | 31.21 | 25.10 | 23.59 | 48.20 |
| res_D | 3.85 | 5.86 | 7.74 | 13.56 | 21.97 | 36.93 | 52.25 | 29.12 | 92.19 | 68.57 |
| sce_D | 1.21 | 1.63 | 2.10 | 3.45 | 4.21 | 7.25 | 10.50 | 10.14 | 20.67 | 20.19 |
| edu_D | 3.29 | 7.01 | 9.79 | 19.10 | 29.67 | 46.26 | 95.77 | 82.53 | 102.28 | 180.11 |
| sho_D | 2.45 | 4.82 | 9.30 | 13.79 | 19.84 | 26.89 | 57.56 | 42.83 | 52.01 | 157.12 |
| tra_D | 5.19 | 10.80 | 17.76 | 27.95 | 31.89 | 45.85 | 82.30 | 105.11 | 113.41 | 110.55 |
The regression results of OLS model in ten scales.
| Variables | Coefficients and SE in Different Scales | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 m | 1000 m | 1500 m | 2000 m | 2500 m | 3000 m | 3500 m | 4000 m | 4500 m |
| |
| PD | 0.087 | 0.125 | 0.164 | 0.205 | 0.186 | 0.263 | − | − | − | − |
| RD | 0.053 | − | − | − | − | − | 0.997 | − | − | − |
| BD | −0.034 | − | −0.153 | −0.183 | −0.196 | −0.212 | −0.714 | − | 0.274 | − |
| LM | 0.075 | 0.040 | − | − | − | − | 0.286 | 0.125 | 0.569 | 0.578 |
| acc_D | 0.167 | 0.306 | 0.312 | 0.454 | 0.328 | 0.515 | − | −0.176 | − | − |
| cat_D | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| com_D | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| spo_D | − | − | −0.129 | −0.195 | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| gov_D | − | − | 0.193 | 0.391 | − | 0.727 | −1.192 | 1.903 | − | − |
| fin_D | 0.129 | 0.156 | − | − | − | − | − | −0.375 | − | − |
| liv_D | − | 0.133 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| med_D | − | −0.125 | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| pub_D | 0.146 | 0.202 | 0.251 | 0.362 | 0.546 | 0.491 | − | − | − | − |
| res_D | 0.261 | 0.245 | 0.208 | − | 0.159 | − | − | −1.035 | − | − |
| sce_D | 0.033 | − | −0.070 | −0.184 | −0.135 | −0.281 | − | −0.174 | − | − |
| edu_D | 0.043 | − | − | − | − | −0.613 | − | − | − | − |
| sho_D | 0.103 | 0.129 | 0.166 | − | − | − | 0.581 | − | − | − |
| tra_D | 0.075 | − | − | − | − | − | 0.764 | − | − | − |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Adj. R2 | 0.572 | 0.671 | 0.730 | 0.771 | 0.774 | 0.821 | 0.586 | 0.931 | 0.548 | 0.321 |
| AIC | 8053.725 | 1862.015 | 779.284 | 409.614 | 273.811 | 171.820 | 218.667 | 24.577 | 143.535 | 145.077 |
| RSS | 1723.607 | 348.318 | 132.847 | 65.224 | 42.660 | 24.317 | 41.410 | 5.204 | 29.374 | 37.985 |
| Moran I of Residual | 0.508 | 0.529 | 0.515 | 0.462 | 0.408 | 0.247 | 0.128 | 0.014 | 0.072 | 0.022 |
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.598 | 0.215 | 0.623 | |
Model evaluation results of local models in different scales.
| Scales | Models | Adj. R2 | AIC | RSS | Bandwidth | Moran I of Residual | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 m | GWR | 0.922 | 2713.854 | 235.732 | 1143.620 | −0.017 | 0.033 |
| MGWR | 0.917 | 2245.675 | 281.408 | Varied 1 | −0.034 | 0.000 | |
| 1000 m | GWR | 0.946 | 515.039 | 39.678 | 1924.210 | 0.025 | 0.110 |
| MGWR | 0.967 | −140.070 | 26.100 | Varied | −0.075 | 0.000 | |
| 1500 m | GWR | 0.955 | 207.513 | 14.360 | 2466.280 | 0.061 | 0.010 |
| MGWR | 0.969 | 173.983 | 8.683 | Varied | −0.044 | 0.101 | |
| 2000 m | GWR | 0.942 | 183.366 | 11.281 | 3066.800 | 0.110 | 0.000 |
| MGWR | 0.972 | 99.093 | 4.477 | Varied | −0.021 | 0.590 | |
| 2500 m | GWR | 0.935 | 145.831 | 8.402 | 3524.190 | 0.131 | 0.000 |
| MGWR | 0.967 | 111.092 | 3.389 | Varied | −0.059 | 0.183 | |
| 3000 m | GWR | 0.923 | 109.618 | 7.868 | 5290.090 | 0.028 | 0.445 |
| MGWR | 0.957 | 39.289 | 2.941 | Varied | −0.080 | 0.139 | |
| 3500 m | GWR | 0.944 | 49.544 | 4.202 | 5862.660 | 0.013 | 0.677 |
| MGWR | 0.957 | 39.289 | 2.941 | Varied | −0.009 | 0.999 | |
| 4000 m | GWR | 0.982 | −32.981 | 0.928 | 5511.2 | −0.026 | 0.813 |
| MGWR | 0.970 | 41.006 | 1.305 | Varied | −0.047 | 0.587 | |
| 4500 m | GWR | 0.980 | −39.450 | 0.961 | 5414.45 | −0.132 | 0.032 |
| MGWR | 0.978 | −30.664 | 1.085 | Varied | −0.001 | 0.834 | |
| 5000 m | GWR | 0.973 | −16.039 | 1.103 | 5223.95 | −0.099 | 0.173 |
| MGWR | 0.981 | −20.242 | 0.712 | Varied | −0.002 | 0.850 |
1 The bandwidth of factors in the MGWR model are varied, not fixed.
Figure 2The estimated coefficient maps in the grid with 500 m.
Figure 3The estimated coefficient maps in the grid with 1000 m.
Figure 4The estimated coefficient maps in the grid with 1500 m.
Figure 5The estimated coefficient maps in the grid with 2000 m.
Figure 6The estimated coefficient maps in the grid with 2500 m.
Figure 7The estimated coefficient maps in the grid with 3000 m.
Figure 8The estimated coefficient maps in the grid with 3500 m.
Figure 9The estimated coefficient maps in the grid with 4000 m.
Figure 10The estimated coefficients map in the grid with 4500 m.
Figure 11The estimated coefficient maps in the grid with 5000 m.