| Literature DB >> 35564642 |
Yongseop Kim1, Junhyoung Kim1, Jung-Min Lee2,3, Dong-Chul Seo4, Hyun Chul Jung3,5.
Abstract
Taekwondo is a modernized martial art that includes various combinations of hand and kicking techniques and core values of Taekwondo philosophy such as courtesy, mutual respect, and self-control. Physical inactivity is highly prevalent among older adults and is a major contributor to health-related problems. Intergenerational physical activity programs are used as an effective tool to make a positive connection between generations and provide additional health benefits for both generations. This review study aimed to examine the theories of intergenerational physical activity programs and propose the Intergenerational Taekwondo Program (ITP). Various theories such as the transtheoretical model, contact theory, social capital theory, situated learning theory, human development theory, personality theory, and whole-person wellness model have been adopted in intergenerational physical activity programs. Our review suggests that to develop the Intergenerational Taekwondo Program, instructors should (1) establishing common goals, (2) understand differences in physical and mental abilities, and (3) offer incentives to encourage participants in physical activity programs. The proposed ITP program has the potential to not just provide unique inherent values and improving physical functions, but also to form generational connections.Entities:
Keywords: intergenerational program; physical activity; social relation; taekwondo
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35564642 PMCID: PMC9101663 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Summary of intergenerational physical activity intervention studies.
| Reference | Study Population | Setting | Intervention Content | Outcome Measurement | Effectiveness | Intergenerational PA Components | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Key | Instrument | Content | YG | EG | ||||
| Louise Douse et al. (2020) | 25 students (age 14 y) | University | 11 weeks | Generations Dancing | Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale | Basic Needs | N/A | Social Integration ↑ | N/A |
| Eun Hae Kim (2021) | 17 younger adults (age 18–25) | Community center | 8 weeks | Tai Chi | Berlin Social Support Scale | A sense of social support | Sense of social support - | Sense of social support—Intention to continue ↑ | N/A |
| Minghetti et al. (2021) | 72 children (age 4–6) | Nursing home | 25 weeks | Dynamic Balance exercise | YG: Test of Gross Motor Development 2 (TGMD-2) | YG: Gross motor skills | Physical performance ↑ (jump power, hand grip strength) | Physical performance ↑ | N/A |
| Mosor et al. (2019) | 78 children (age 2–7) | Geriatric institution | 20 weeks | Intergenerational contact activity | Facial expression | Active engagement | Active engagement (Facial expression: Happy/smiling) ↑ | No significant changes | N/A |
| Ebrahimi et al. (2019) | 60 youth | Community service center | 12 weeks | Intergenerational interaction program | General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) | Depression | N/A | Somatic symptoms ↓ | Interaction includes any younger person’s active involvement with an elderly person and fulfilling the wishes of the elderly individually for 45 min |
| Sowle (2015) | Younger adults | University | 24 weeks | Exergame | Cancer Prevention Research Center Exercise | Self-reported activity level | N/A | Physical activity level ↑ | Using Microsoft Kinetics (detect the participants’ motion through a sensor). Participating in Wii soccer, volleyball, track and field, bowling, boxing, and table tennis. Two participants (or younger adult leaders) lead the program and the others follow the motions. |
| Choi and Sohng (2018) | 70 Children (age 4–5) | Senior Center | 8 Weeks | Intergenerational Exchange Program | Health-related quality of Life (HRQoL) | Health-related quality of life | Learning-related social skills ↑ | Quality of life ↑ | Sharing ideas about an appropriate frequency of programs, places, and things should be considered within the program. |
| Buonsenso et al. (2021) | 140 Older adults | Gymnastic group, Leisure Center | N/A | Intergenerational physical activity | Global physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ) | Physical activity enjoyment | N/A | Intergenerational Physical activity enjoyment ↑ | N/A |
| Friedman and Godfrey. (2008) | 30 older adults | Jewish Community Elderly Center | 5 years | The intergenerational Exercise (Warm-up breathing, Warm-up and cool down stretching, balance, aerobic, free-weight) | N/A | N/A |
Sense of competition ↑ Listening skills and attention span ↑ Stereotype attitude change ↑ |
Memory ↑ Sense of competition ↑ Anxiety and Depression↓ Self-validation, Self-esteem ↑ Lifelong exercise ↑ Kinesthetic awareness ↑ |
Children and adults arrange intermingled circle (fun and serious) Adult-level PA Older adults help students to realize to concentrate on exercise Leader, older adults praise, encourage students Breathe deeply together (finding a common rhythm) EG and YG make shapes, patterns and provide balance test (strengthening exercise) ** EG and YG hold each-others hand and raise lower legs (Balance) Marching together (Aerobic exercise) |
| Rhodes et al. (2010) | 107 families | Local Recreation Center | 4 weeks | Intergenerational Family Physical Activity | Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) | Leisure Time Physical Activity | -Family physical activity ↑ | N/A | |
| Perry and Weatherby (2011) | 7 youth (8–14) | Community Gym | 8 weeks | Intergenerational Tai Chi | Seven-Day Physical Activity Recall (7DPAR) | Physical activity | Physical activity ↑ | Physical activity ↑ |
Skill building and provide informational messages, positive reinforcement (Confidence) Paired YG and EG interactive exercise pose |
| Strand et al. (2014) | 46 older adults (60–80) | University | 25 weeks | The Living well through Intergenerational Fitness and Exercise (LIFE): | Stages of Change for Physical Activity Questionnaire. | Physical activity | N/A | Satisfaction ↑ |
30 min of interactive games (e.g., icebreakers, storytelling activities, strategy and mind games, weekly to promote camaraderie, problem solving, and communication skills) |
| McConnell and Naylor (2016) | 22 elementary (Grade 4/5) | Community center | 12 weeks | Intergenerational Physical Activity Leadership (IPAL): | Systems for Observing Physical and Leisure Activity in Youth (SOPLAY) | Physical activity and environmental context |
Older adults remind rules, encouraging students Older adults taught how to do Chair aerobic exercise Older adults help to facilitate physical activity | ||
Note. YG: young generation; OG: older generation (check the abbreviation).
Development of Intergenerational Taekwondo Program.
| Stages | Activity | Duration | Program Contents | Photos | Contact Theory | Whole Person Wellness Model (WPWM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Socializing | 5 | Older adults and young adults having a conversation. |
| Support from authority | Social |
| Meditation | 2–3 | Spiritual | ||||
| Greetings | 1 | Standing: make a fist and keep back straight and look in front of the sight. |
| Social | ||
| Main Activity | Warm up | 5 | Walking around the room with line |
| Physical | |
| Warm up Stretching | 10 | Upper-arm stretching |
| Equal group status | Physical | |
| Shoulder stretching |
| |||||
| Neck stretching |
| |||||
| Side abdominal stretching |
| |||||
| Single-leg stretching |
| |||||
| Isometric lower-body stretching |
| |||||
| Taekwondo Practice | 10 | Blocking (low, middle, high) |
| Support from authority | Physical | |
| Punching | ||||||
| Stances | ||||||
| Kicking (front and roundhouse) | ||||||
| Taekwondo | 15 | Punching |
| Equal group status | Physical | |
| Self-defense (low block) |
| |||||
| Self-defense (middle block) |
| |||||
| Ending Greeting | Cool down Stretching | 5 | Whole-body stretching |
| Physical | |
| Sharing feelings | 5 | Talk about your experience and feelings on Taekwondo activity | Opportunity for friendship | Social | ||
| Meditation | 3 | Spiritual |