| Literature DB >> 35564517 |
José C Ponce-Bordón1, David Lobo-Triviño1, Ana Rubio-Morales1, Roberto López Del Campo2, Ricardo Resta2, Miguel A López-Gajardo1.
Abstract
The present study aimed to analyze the influence of the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) on match physical demands in the top Spanish professional football league. Match physical demand data from all the matches for two seasons (2017/2018 and 2018/2019) in the First Spanish Division (n = 1454) were recorded using an optical tracking system (ChyronHego®). Total distance, relative total distance covered per minute, distance covered between 14-21 km·h-1, distance covered between 21-24 km·h-1, and distance covered at more than 24 km·h-1 were analyzed; also, the number of sprints between 21-24 km·h-1 and more than 24 km·h-1 were taken into consideration. The times the VAR intervened in matches were also taken into account. Results showed that total distance and relative total distance significantly decreased in seasons with VAR compared to seasons without VAR. Finally, distance covered between 21-24 km·h-1, distance covered at more than 24 km·h-1, and the number of high-intensity efforts between 21-24 km·h-1 and more than 24 km·h-1 increased in seasons with VAR compared to seasons without VAR, but the differences were nonsignificant. Thus, these findings help practitioners to better understand the effects of the VAR system on professional football physical performance and to identify strategies to reproduce competition demands.Entities:
Keywords: decision making; match analysis; physical performance; professional soccer; video-replay technology
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35564517 PMCID: PMC9104303 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Match physical demands comparison between seasons with and without the VAR in LaLiga Santander.
| Season 2017/2018 | Season 2018/2019 |
| ∆ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 95% CI |
|
| 95% CI | |||
|
|
| 4189 | 109,013, 109,629 | 108,596 | 4497 | 108,289, 108,902 | ** | 0.17 |
|
| 1505 | 74 | 1500, 1510 | 1477 | 73 | 1472, 1482 | *** | 0.38 |
|
| 22,709 | 2322 | 22,557, 22,861 | 22,471 | 2216 | 22,320, 22,622 | 0.10 | |
|
| 3013 | 384 | 2986, 3041 | 3056 | 396 | 3028, 3084 | 0.11 | |
|
| 2930 | 486 | 2894, 2965 | 2960 | 500 | 2925, 2995 | 0.06 | |
|
| 264 | 30 | 262, 267 | 268 | 32 | 266, 270 | 0.13 | |
|
| 161 | 22 | 160, 163 | 162 | 23 | 160, 164 | 0.04 | |
Note. SD = Standard Deviation, m = meters, No. = Number, TD = Total distance, MIRD = Medium-intensity running distance, HIRD = High-intensity running distance, VHIRD = Very high-intensity running distance, Sp 21–24 = Sprints between 21–24 km·h−1, Sp > 24 = Sprints at speeds above 24 km·h−1, ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.