| Literature DB >> 35564362 |
Zhongguang Sun1,2,3, Xuelong Li4, Kequan Wang1,2,3, Fakai Wang5, Deyou Chen4, Zhen Li4.
Abstract
Coal is affected by the concentrated stress disturbance of mining, the disturbance of drilling hole formation, and the concentrated stress of coal shrinkage and splitting of gas desorption from the hole wall; these result in a large number of secondary cracks that collect and leak gas. As a result, it is difficult for the coal seam sealing process to meet engineering quality sealing requirements, which results in problems such as low gas concentration during the extraction process. In this paper, based on the analysis of coal pore and fissure characteristics, and in view of the current situation of gas drainage and sealing in this coal seam, combined with the existing grouting and sealing technology, it is proposed to use pressure grouting and sealing to realize the sealing of deep coal bodies in the hole wall. According to the field conditions, the experimental pressure sealing parameter index is as follows: theoretical sealing length L1 = 9.69 m, the sealing length L2 = 13.98 m is verified, and the final sealing length is determined to be 15 m; the sealing radius is determined to be 0.6 m; the cement slurry was prepared on site with a water: cement ratio of 2:1; PG = 0.43 MPa was calculated; the range of the slurry diffusion radius R was 93.4-176.6 cm; the grouting pressure was determined to be 0.516 MPa. Field application practice has proved that: (1) Under the same drilling parameters and sealing parameters, the gas drainage effect of drilling with pressure sealing is 2.3 times higher than that without pressure sealing; (2) Using traditional sealing technology for drilling holes, the gas extraction concentration is far lower than the sealing operation effect of using the pressure sealing process; (3) Reasonably extending the length of the gas extraction drilling and sealing is a basic guarantee for realizing a substantial increase in the gas extraction concentration; (4) Sealing with pressure leads to a reliable and stable hole process.Entities:
Keywords: cement slurry; coal seam; disturbance crack; gas drainage; polyurethane; pressure sealing
Year: 2022 PMID: 35564362 PMCID: PMC9104883 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19094968
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Diagram of coal pore type. (a) Schematic diagram of effective pores and isolated pores. (b) Classification of the effective pore.
Figure 2Stress distribution around the borehole.
Figure 3Electron microscopy of coal before and after pressure grouting: (a) before, (b) after.
Figure 4Schematic diagram of polyurethane and slurry sealing.
Basic parameters of time-delay foamed polyurethane.
| Density | Viscosity | Mixing Ratio | Shelf Time | Casting Multiple | Dimensional Stability | Bond Strength | Compressive Strength | Curing Time | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Β | A | Β | A:Β | A | Β | 4–10 times | 70 °C 48 h ≤ 2 | ΜPa | ΜPa | 360 s–600 s |
| 1.17 | 1.42 | 120 | 60 | 1:1 | 6 months | 6 months | |||||
Basic properties of single slurry.
| Water:Cement Ratio | Viscosity (s) | Specific Gravity (g/cm) | Condensation Time | Stone Body (%) | Compressive Strength (MPa) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Setting | Final Setting | 3 | 7 | 14 | 28 | ||||
| 0.5:1 | 139 | 1.86 | 7–41 | 12–36 | 99 | 4.14 | 6.46 | 15.30 | 22.00 |
| 0.75:1 | 33 | 1.62 | 10–47 | 20–33 | 97 | 2.43 | 2.6 | 5.54 | 11.27 |
| 1:1 | 18 | 1.49 | 14–56 | 24–27 | 85 | 2.00 | 2.4 | 2.42 | 8.90 |
| 1.5:1 | 17 | 1.37 | 16–52 | 34–47 | 67 | 2.04 | 2.33 | 1.78 | 2.22 |
| 2:1 | 16 | 1.30 | 17–7 | 48–15 | 56 | 1.66 | 2.56 | 2.10 | 2.80 |
Figure 5Location of No. 10 mining shares.
Figure 6Yearly changes in the absolute gas emission of over mine.
Figure 7Relationship diagram of the coal gas content and depth.
Proximate analysis and coal type of group coal.
| Coal Seam | Type | H (mm) | Ag (%) | S (%) | Q (kcal/kg) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Bituminous | 31.84–35 | 24–39 | 18.19–33.86 | <0.4 | 7112–8742 |
| 9–10 | Bituminous | 32.63–34.97 | 30–34 | 15.83–22.55 | 0.31–0.63 | 7600–8600 |
| 11 | Bituminous | 31.24–32.73 | 22 | 21–37 | <0.4 | 8562–8542 |
Notes: V is volatile matter of coal without ash-based, %; H is gum layer thickness, mm; Ag is air drying of coal ash, %; S is sulfur of coal, %; Q is calorific value per unit mass of coal, kcal/kg.
Figure 8Seam histogram of group coals.
Basic parameters determination.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.04 | 13.5 | 72 | 60 | 0.005–0.08 | 1.28–20.44 |
Notes: The grouting time is generally 15 min, which is 900 s; the 525 cement can be injected into the crack width, which is generally 0.04 cm.
Figure 9Drilling gas extraction concentration.
Figure 10Comparison of 1#–6# borehole gas drainage pumping negative curves.
Gas drainage concentration of each time period of experimental drilling.
| Time | 0 (d) | 6 (d) | 12 (d) | 18 (d) | 24 (d) | 30 (d) | 36 (d) | 42 (d) | 48 (d) | 54 (d) | 60 (d) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | ||||||||||||
| 1# | 82.5 | 43.2 | 32.1 | 12.3 | 8.6 | 5.2 | 3.8 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 1.5 | |
| 2# | 85.4 | 60.8 | 53.4 | 32.4 | 22.8 | 14.6 | 10.4 | 9.3 | 5.1 | 3.8 | 3.4 | |
| 3# | 92.5 | 86.4 | 80.4 | 75.6 | 70.2 | 64.6 | 56.3 | 50.0 | 42.4 | 34.2 | 24.0 | |
| 4# | 93.0 | 85.6 | 82.3 | 74.8 | 71.2 | 67.2 | 60.4 | 53.2 | 44.3 | 34.3 | 26.6 | |
| 5# | 93.4 | 87.2 | 82.0 | 76.9 | 75.6 | 67.8 | 59.2 | 54.4 | 45.6 | 37.6 | 28.2 | |
| 6# | 94.0 | 86.7 | 87.2 | 80.3 | 75.4 | 69.2 | 62.3 | 56.2 | 47.4 | 38.2 | 31.0 | |
Figure 11Relationship between sealing pressure and average concentration of gas extraction.