| Literature DB >> 35564200 |
Wuyi Ming1, Zhiwen Jiang1, Guofu Luo1, Yingjie Xu1, Wenbin He1, Zhuobin Xie2, Dili Shen3, Liwei Li1.
Abstract
Transparent nano-ceramics have an important high-transmittance, material-integrating structure and function and a variety of potential applications, such as use in infrared windows, optical isolators, composite armors, intelligent terminal screens, and key materials of solid-state lasers. Transparent ceramics were originally developed to replace single crystals because of their low fabricating cost, controllable shape, and variable composition. Therefore, this study reviews and summarizes the development trends in transparent nano-ceramics and their potential applications. First, we review the research progress and application of laser nano-ceramic materials, focusing on the influence of controllable doping of rare earth ions on thermal conductivity and the realization of large-scale fabrication technology. Second, the latest research progress on magneto-optical transparent nano-ceramics, mainly including terbium gallium garnet (Tb3Ga5O12, TGG) ceramics and terbium aluminum garnet (Tb3Al5O12, TAG) ceramics, are summarized, and their performance is compared. Third, the research progress of transparent armor nano-ceramic materials, represented by MgAl2O3 and Aluminum oxynitride (AlON), are reviewed. Lastly, the progress in electro-optical transparent nano-ceramics and scintillation transparent nano-ceramics is reported, and the influence of the material-fabrication process on electro-optic effect or luminous intensity is compared. Moreover, the effect of particle diameter on fabrication, the relationship between nano powder and performance, and different sintering methods are discussed. In summary, this study provides a meaningful reference for low-cost and sustainable production in the future.Entities:
Keywords: IR transmittance; magneto-optical material; mechanical strength; microstructure; nano powder; optical transmittance; preparation method; transparent nano-ceramics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35564200 PMCID: PMC9099613 DOI: 10.3390/nano12091491
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Sketch of light transmission in a polycrystalline ceramic.
Figure 2Performance requirements and applications of transparent nano-ceramics.
Figure 3SEM images of Al2O3 (a), Y2O3 (b) starting nano powders, as well as 2.88 Y2O3–0.12Nd2O3–5Al2O3 powder mixture (c) and Y2O3 powders after planetary ball milling for 15 h (d) [16]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [16]. Copyright 2014, copyright ELSEVIER.
Summary of doped YAG transparent nano-ceramics described in the text grouped by doped type and published year.
| Doping Type | Year, Powder, and Fabrication | Findings | Performance | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nd3+-doped | 1995; the starting nano powders include Y2O3 (60 nm), Al2O3 (400 nm), and Nd2O3 (500 nm); solid-state reaction method (Czochralski method). | The optical scattering loss of Nd:YAG was about 0.9%/cm. Oscillation threshold of 309 mW and a slope efficiency of 28% [ | For the first time, polycrystalline ceramics were successfully used for effective laser cutting. | |
| 2002; raw nano powder of oxide of aluminum, yttrium, and neodymium; ball milling -> slip casting -> vacuum sintering -> YAG transparent nano-ceramics. | In laser experiment of Nd:YAG ceramic and single-crystal rods, the output powers of 88 W and 99 W were obtained, respectively [ | Compared with single-crystal Nd:YAG, the light-to-light efficiency of Nd:YAG nanocrystalline ceramics needs to be further improved. | ||
| 2010; an average particle size of 100 nm by reverse-strike precipitation method; HIP method. | The infrared transmittance of the sample was 80%, and its emission spectrum was the same as 1 at.% Nd:YAG single crystal [ | Nd: YAG nano powder with an average size of about 100 nm was prepared for the first time. | ||
| 2021; high-purity powder mixture; cold isostatic pressing. | The transmittance of the 0.5 wt.% TEOS sample reached 75% in the near-infrared region [ | The densification rate of Nd: YAG transparent ceramics could be adjusted by adding different wt.% TEOS so as to improve its transmittance. | ||
| Ho-doped | 2015; the nano powders were made up of near-spherical particles; solid-state reaction involving a pre-calcining stage. | The slope efficiency of laser oscillations in the fabricated Ho:YAG transparent ceramic sample for pumping power was 40% (at 1.85 μm) [ | Based on the nano-powders prepared by laser ablation, Ho:YAG optical ceramics with finer particle size were prepared. | |
| 2018; uniform ceramic grain; HIP method. | The in-band pumping method produced a 2117 nm laser with an output power of 24.6 W [ | Further development of large-scale, YAG transparent ceramics with low Ho3+ doping concentration is required to alleviate the thermal effect during the lasing process. | ||
| Er-doped | 2018; high-purity 0.5 at.% Er3+:YAG powder; SPS+HIP methods. | The light–light efficiency of laser was 20%, and the maximum slope efficiency was 31% [ | Transmission values of the Er3+: YAG transparent ceramics were lower than that of Er3+:YAG single crystals, which requires further improvement of the fabrication process. | |
| Tm-doped | 2010. | Under an absorbed pump power of 2.21 W at 785 nm, an output power of up to 860 mW was produced [ | Tm:YAG ceramic is a promising laser working medium. Higher power and efficiency can be achieved by using an improved laser cavity and an optimized transmission optical path. | |
| Yb-doped | 2008. | The ceramic Yb:YAG laser exhibited a continuous tunability at a maximum output power of 1.6 W [ | Except for crystal Yb:YAG investigations, this was the first study of the tunability of ceramic Yb:YAG lasers. |
Figure 4Schematic diagram of YAG transparent nano-ceramics’ application in laser diode pumping system.
Figure 5Microstructure of TGG transparent nano-ceramic and its transmittance spectra [39]; (a) SEM image showing the microstructure of a typical TGG transparent nano-ceramics sample; (b) Comparison of transmission spectra between TGG nano-ceramics samples and TGG single crystal. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [39]. Copyright 2011, copyright IEEE Xplore.
Figure 6SEM morphology of TGG powders sintered at 1100 °C (a), the surface of sample #1 sintered at 1500 (b), sample #2 sintered at 1550 °C (c), and sample #3 sintered at 1600 °C (d) [43]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [43]. Copyright 2019, copyright ELSEVIER.
Figure 7Experimental results of depolarization as a function of laser power (red and blue circles represent results for TGG ceramics with and without magnetic field, respectively; squares represent calculated results for TGG single crystals; solid lines represent theoretical curves) [48]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [48]. Copyright 2014, copyright Optical Society of America.
Figure 8Optical quality of TAG transparent nano-ceramics; (a) samples and (b) optical transmittance of polished TAG transparent nano-ceramics [49]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. Copyright 2011, copyright ELSEVIER.
Comparison of characteristics of Faraday isolators with different magneto-optical media [38,56]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [38]. Copyright 2018, copyright CNKI. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [56]. Copyright 2017, copyright OSA.
| Medium | Isolation Ratio@ Laser Power | Isolation Ratio@ Laser Power | Water Cooling |
|---|---|---|---|
| TGG crystal | 30 dB@650 W | 6.5 m@340 W | Optional |
| TGG transparent nano-ceramic | 30 dB@340 W | 6.5 m@340 W | Optional |
| TAG transparent nano-ceramic | 38 dB@300 W | 8 m@300 W | Required |
| Ce: TAG transparent nano-ceramic (0.1 at.%) | 31 dB@300 W | 3.8 m@300 W | Required |
Figure 9Scheme of the experiment of (a) thermal depolarization measurement and (b) studying thermally induced lens.
Figure 10Scheme of functional layers in a transparent armor concept with a four-layer design [65]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [65]. Copyright 2017, copyright ELSEVIER.
Figure 11Sample particle size distribution and XRD pattern; (a) FEG-SEM micrograph, (b) XRD pattern, (c) TEM micrograph, and (d) particle size distribution of as-received spinel powder SPI-P1 [77]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [77]. Copyright 2021, copyright ELSEVIER.
Figure 12Sample size and XRD pattern; (a) SEM images of the morphologies, (b) particle size distribution, and (c) XRD pattern measured of the AlON powders after ball milling [89]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [89]. Copyright 2022, copyright ScienceDirect.
Figure 13Samples and transmittance curve; (a) samples doped with different SiO2 contents and different temperatures in the process of HIP; (b) transmittance of AlON transparent nano-ceramics doped with different SiO2 contents at 1810 °C for 3 h [92]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [92]. Copyright 2021, copyright ScienceDirect.
Figure 14Transparent armor nano-ceramics; (a) MgAl2O4 transparent nano-ceramics, 12 mm thick, created through pre-sintering in air and HIP methods [83]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [83]. Copyright 2014, copyright ScienceDirect. (b) a photograph revealing the transmittance of the Mg-γ-AlON transparent ceramic after HIP treatment [96]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [96]. Copyright 2019, copyright ScienceDirect.
Figure 15Comparison of transparent armor materials for STANAG 4569; (a) Level 2 and (b) Level 3 [65]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [65]. Copyright 2017, copyright ELSEVIER.
Figure 16SEM images of PMN-PT polycrystals; (a) 1275 °C, 30 min: average grain size (2.7 µm); (b) 1275 °C, 60 min: average grain size (3.2 µm); (c) 1300 °C, 90 min: average grain size (3.8 µm); (d) 1300 °C, 120 min: average grain size (4.3 µm) [98]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [98]. Copyright 2019, copyright ScienceDirect.
Summary of electro-optical transparent nano-ceramics described in the text grouped by publication year.
| Year, Authors | Powder and Fabrication | Findings | Performance | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970, Haertling et al. [ | Preparation of optoceramics with a thickness of 1 mm using a two-step hot-pressing method. | The density reached up to 99% of the standard density and the transmittance reached up to 80%. | When the wavelength increased, the light transmission performance also gradually increased to 80%. | The hot-pressing firing method could improve the density of ceramics, but the light transmission performance needed to be improved. |
| 2016, Somwan et al. [ | Mixture of Bi2O3 and CuO; vibrating grinding and sintering. | After adding mixed oxides, the sintering temperature decreased by nearly 50 °C to 1200 °C. | At 1200 °C, the induced strain of the enhanced electric field reached 0.0079%. | Higher dielectric constants could be obtained at lower sintering temperatures. |
| 2017, Zhang et al. [ | Mixture of 3% lanthanum, 75% PMN, and 25% PT; two-step hot-pressing method. | As the temperature increased, the half-wave voltage increased from 200 to 400 V. | The electro-optic coefficient increased with an increase in temperature. | The ferroelectric preparation process and transmittance could be controlled by temperature. |
| 2018, Samanta et al. [ | Mixture of 69 ppm Fe3+ and 78 ppm Nb5+; sol–gel. | Conductivity increased by two orders of magnitude as the sample changed from 100 Hz to 1 MHz. | Conductivity was proportional to frequency. | The conductivity could be controlled by controlling the magnitude of the frequency. |
| 2018, Wang et al. [ | PMN-PT/CFO thin films; sol–gel spin coating. | The temperature rose from 650 to 730 degrees Celsius; the leakage current decreased from 97.54 to 40.59. | The ferroelectric properties decreased with an increase in the ratio of CFO to PMN-PT and increased with an increase in temperature. | The coupling effect between the ferroelectric phase and the ferromagnetic phase was observed, which will pave the way for the preparation of multifunctional crystals in the future. |
| 2021, Ze et al. [ | PMN-PT ceramic materials doped with Sm; two-step sintering method. | When the Sm doping amount increased from 0 to 2%, the PMN-PT decreased from 3.15 to 3.05 eV. | When there was Sm doping, it affected the size of the electro-optic coefficient. | The optical power could be controlled by doping Sm. |
Figure 17The properties of Mg:LuAG scintillation ceramics with different Ce contents (0.025~0.3 at.%) after sintering. (a) Transmittance of samples with different Ce contents; (b) Sintered state of different Ce content transmittances of Mg:LuAG ceramics; (c) Transmittance of annealed Mg:LuAG ceramics with different Ce contents [117]. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [117]. Copyright 2018, copyright ScienceDirect.
Summary of scintillation transparent nano-ceramics described in the text grouped by publication year.
| Year, Authors | Powder and Fabrication | Findings | Performance | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017, Zhou et al. [ | 99.9% strontium nitrate hydrate, 99.9% neodymium nitrate hydrate, and 99.9% potassium fluoride hydrate; the chemical precipitation method. | SrF2 nanoparticles with Nd3+ doping concentrations up to 2 mol% kept a single cubic fluoride structure. | The synthesized powder could prepare transparent ceramics with a transmittance of about 80% at 1060 nm. | Nd3+ was successfully introduced into the SrF2 lattice, making it possible to use this material to make transparent ceramics. |
| 2018, Yi et al. [ | Nd:(Ca0.94Gd0.06)2.06 nano powder; deionized water coprecipitation | As the Nd3+ content increased from 0.5 to 5.0, the measured lifetime dropped sharply from 484.9 μs to 47.8 μs. | The transparent ceramic had high transparency and an almost non-porous microstructure. | The thermal conductivity of Nd:(Ca0.94Gd0.06)F2.06 transparent ceramics was better than that of traditional laser glass, and transparent ceramic is a promising laser material. |
| 2019, Hostaša et al. [ | Industrial oxide powder, 0.3% Ce: GGAG,Ce0.009Gd2.991Al2Ga3O12 ceramic sample. | At 1250 °C, the formation of the GGAG phase could be observed. This corresponds to the increase in shrinkage observed above 1200 °C, with the optimum at 1430 °C. | TEOS was determined to be the most suitable sintering aid in the tests, providing the highest sample density and clarity. | The optimum amount of sintering aid and the corresponding sintering cycle should be further investigated. |
| 2020, Trofimov et al. [ | High-purity (99.99%) starting material and 0.5% tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS); | The Ce3+ comprehensive RL strength of single crystal increased 1.4 times from RT-450 °C, while polycrystalline ceramics increased 1.9 times from room temperature to 300 °C. | Both single-crystal and polycrystalline ceramics exhibited high optical transparency up to about 2.5 eV. | The LuAG:Ce scintillator could adapt to a wide temperature range and could be applied to many occasions. |
| 2020, Bartosiewicz et al. [ | Mixure of 4 N-purity Lu2O3, Al2O3, and La2O3 oxides; the μ-PD method using RF induction heating. | With the increase in La content, the main luminescence in the UV region gradually moved from 330 nm to 295 nm. | Lu3Al5O12 produced strong luminescence in the deep ultraviolet spectral range | LuAG: La doping significantly reduced the scintillation afterglow of LuAG: La crystals. Therefore, it is possible to generate new scintillators in the deep ultraviolet range. |
Figure 18Average diameter of nano powders in the reviewed transparent nano-ceramics [12,14,15,17,43,52,81,83,86,88].