| Literature DB >> 35564198 |
Mrutyunjay Maharana1,2, Niharika Baruah3, Sisir Kumar Nayak3, Niranjan Sahoo3, Kai Wu1, Lalit Goswami4.
Abstract
The purpose of this present study is to prepare a stable mineral-oil (MO)-based nanofluid (NF) for usage as a coolant in a transformer. Nanoparticles (NPs) such as hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) and titanium oxide (TiO2) have superior thermal and electrical characteristics. Their dispersion into MO is likely to elevate the electrothermal properties of NFs. Therefore, different batches of NFs are prepared by uniformly dispersing the insulating h-BN and semiconducting TiO2 NP of different concentrations in MO. Bulk h-BN NP of size 1μm is exfoliated into 2D nanosheets of size 150-200 nm, subsequently enhancing the surface area of exfoliated h-BN (Eh-BN). However, from the zeta-potential analysis, NP concentration of 0.01 and 0.1 wt.% are chosen for further study. The thermal conductivity and ACBDV studies of the prepared NF are performed to investigate the cooling and insulation characteristics. The charging-dynamics study verifies the enhancement in ACBDV of the Eh-BN NF. Weibull statistical analysis is carried out to obtain the maximum probability of ACBDV failure, and it is observed that 0.01 wt.% based NF has superior cooling and insulation properties than MO and remaining batches of NFs.Entities:
Keywords: 2D nanomaterials; breakdown; charge dynamics; electrophoresis; nanodielectrics; thermal conductivity; voltage
Year: 2022 PMID: 35564198 PMCID: PMC9106012 DOI: 10.3390/nano12091489
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Specifications of MO.
| Characteristic | Specification |
|---|---|
| Formula | CnH2n+2 |
| Density (gm/cc) | 0.828 |
| Kinematic viscosity at (cSt) | 0.0123 |
| Interfacial tension (IFT)at (N/m) | 0.047 |
| Flash point in (°C) | 146 |
| Pour point in (°C) | −18 |
| Tan delta at 90 °C (Max). | 0.0085 |
| Water content (ppm) | 25 |
| AC breakdown voltage (kV) | 30 |
| Thermal conductivity (W/m-K) | 0.128 |
Specifications of NP.
| Characteristic | Specification | |
|---|---|---|
| T | E | |
| Purity (%) | 99.5 | 98 |
| Size (nm) | 21 | 0.1 |
| Density (g/cm3) | 3.9 | 2.29 |
| Dielectric constant | 31 | 3–4 |
| Thermal conductivity (W/m-K) | 11 | 300 |
| Electrical resistivity (Ω-cm) | 1014 | 1015 |
| Thermal expansion coefficient (°C) | 11.5 × 10−6 | 4 × 10−6 |
Figure 1(a) Preparation of nanofluids; (b) stability of NFs at different concentrations of nanofiller.
Measurement uncertainty for ACBDV.
| Source of Uncertainty | % Error (±) |
|---|---|
| Instrument accuracy ( | 0.916 |
| Gap gauge ( | 0.44 |
| Electrode ( | 0.168 |
| Combined uncertainty ( | 1.03 |
Measurement uncertainty for thermal conductivity.
| Source of Uncertainty | % Error (±) |
|---|---|
| Instrument accuracy ( | 0.5 |
| Electrical probe ( | 0.2 |
| Measurement ( | 0.1 |
| Combined uncertainty ( | 0.547 |
Figure 2Thermal conductivity of NFs with the rise in temperature.
Figure 3Mean ACBDV of MO and NFs at 18 and 24 ppm moisture content.
Figure 4Enhancement of ACBDV of NFs between 0.01 and 0.1 wt.% of NP concentration for a moisture level of 18 and 24 ppm.
Figure 5Enhancement of ACBDV of NFs between 18 and 24 ppm moisture level for 0.01 and 0.1 wt % of NP concentration.
Figure 6Weibull probability distribution fluid samples (a) 18 ppm (b) 24 ppm.
Weibull distribution parameters.
| Oil Samples | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 ppm | |||||||
| MO | TiO2 | TiO2 | h-BN 0.01 | h-BN | Eh-BN 0.01 | Eh-BN | |
| α | 35.7 | 47.1 | 42.4 | 68.8 | 59.8 | 76.6 | 68.5 |
| β | 21.5 | 20.8 | 14.8 | 25.8 | 19 | 23.38 | 21.5 |
| 24 ppm | |||||||
| α | 31.7 | 43.1 | 39.8 | 48.5 | 43.5 | 68.4 | 52.8 |
| β | 11.3 | 18.4 | 21.6 | 15.6 | 13.8 | 18.7 | 14.4 |
Failure probabilities at 18 ppm and 24 ppm.
| Moisture Level | Oil Samples | 63.2% | 50% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KV | % Rise | kV | % Rise | ||
| 18 | MO | 35 | 118.5 | 35 | 114.2 |
| TiO2-0.01 | 47 | 62.7 | 46 | 63 | |
| TiO2-0.1 | 43 | 77.9 | 41 | 82.9 | |
| h-BN-0.01 | 68.6 | 11.5 | 68 | 10.3 | |
| h-BN-0.1 | 60.5 | 16.4 | 58.5 | 28.2 | |
| Eh-BN-0.01 | 76.5 | 0 | 75 | 0 | |
| Eh-BN-0.1 | 66.8 | 14.5 | 66.8 | 12.2 | |
| 24 | MO | 32.2 | 114.9 | 30.8 | 119.1 |
| TiO2-0.01 | 42.1 | 64.3 | 42 | 60.7 | |
| TiO2-0.1 | 39.2 | 76.5 | 38.5 | 75.3 | |
| h-BN-0.01 | 49 | 41.2 | 47 | 43.6 | |
| h-BN-0.1 | 42 | 64.7 | 41.5 | 62.6 | |
| Eh-BN-0.01 | 69.2 | 0 | 67.5 | 0 | |
| Eh-BN-0.1 | 52 | 33 | 50.5 | 33.6 | |
Figure 7Study of zeta potential with the surface layer of the NPs.
Figure 8Charging of the NP (a) particle exposed to an external field, (b) ionization or polarization of the NP, (c) depletion of the positive ions, and (d) complete depletion of the positive ions.
Figure 9Charging characteristics of Eh-BN and TiO2 in MO.
Electron captures by the NPs.
| NPs | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TiO2/MO | −1.72 | 11 | 7.54 | 83 |
| Eh-BN/MO | −5.675 | 354 | 2.43 | 860.22 |
Note: N and N are the numbers of electrons and the total number of NPs.