| Literature DB >> 35564193 |
Junming Chen1, Longquan Liu1, Wenjun Xu1, Xiaobin Huang1, Haoqiang Sheng1.
Abstract
Microsatellites have stringent demands for thermal dissipation systems with high efficiency but low weight, which is a difficult combination to obtain using current technologies. The design method of a new cooling system consisting of hollow metallic microlattice material filled with liquid is developed and proposed, and its heat dissipation performance is analyzed through experimental tests and numerical simulations. Through the analysis results of the influences of the microstructures of the hollow microlattice material, it is found that the effective coefficient (the number of channels taking part in convection) has the highest influence on the heat dissipation performance. Numerical simulation results illustrated that the heating surface temperature can be reduced to 301.7 K through special design, which can meet the heat dissipation requirement of most microsatellites. The new microlattice cooling system in this study improves heat dissipation performance while having very low structural weight, thus providing a feasible substitute for thermal control systems in microsatellites.Entities:
Keywords: heat dissipation; hollow microlattice; liquid Ga; low weight; microlattice cooling system; microsatellites
Year: 2022 PMID: 35564193 PMCID: PMC9104770 DOI: 10.3390/nano12091485
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1The design concept of the microlattice cooling system.
Figure 2The (a) unit-cell, (b) structure of the microlattice material, and (c) hollow tube.
Values of the constant.
| Parameters | Pr | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.024 | 3.1 × 10−7 | 29.4 | 0.00183 | 10 |
Figure 3Effects of (a) diameter; (b) fluid rate of the liquid; (c) effective coefficient on hA.
Figure 4Simulation model sketch.
Parameters of the materials.
| Density | Specific Heat | Thermal Conductivity | Viscosity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ga | 5910 | 410 | 29.4 | 0.00183 |
| Ni-P-GNS | 8800 | 493 | 55.8 |
Figure 5Average temperature of heating surface and fluid for various element numbers.
Figure 6Fabrication of the microlattice cooling system. (a) Computer micro-architectural design. (b) 3D printing. (c) Polymer template. (d) Chemical plating. (e) Ni-P-GNS thin film template. (f) Chemical etching of template removal. (g) Electro-coppering. (h) Liquid Ga injection. (i) Microlattice cooling system.
Figure 7(a) Test setup and (b) test point of the heat dissipation performance.
Comparison of test and numerical results (K).
| Location | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experiment | 326 | 330 | 309 | 317 |
| Simulation | 331 | 332 | 313 | 318 |
| Error (%) | 1.53 | 0.61 | 1.29 | 0.32 |
Figure 8Test results of the heat dissipation performance of the cooling system.
Results of the experiment.
| Without Cooling System | Microlattice Cooling System without Peristaltic Pump | Microlattice Cooling System with Peristaltic Pump | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 386.5 | 366.8 | 357.0 |
Simulation results under different inlet velocities and diameters.
| 351.8 | 351.1 | 5.3 | 386.5 | 24.2 | |
| 333.6 | 334.2 | 5.5 | 357.2 | 32.1 | |
| 324.9 | 325.5 | 5.9 | 352.7 | 33.8 | |
| 315.0 | 314.6 | 5.9 | 338.2 | 40.6 |
Figure 9Influence of liquid inlet locations (a) one inlet in the middle; (b) four inlets at the corner; and (c) four inlets in the middle on heat dissipation performance.
Simulation results under different fluid inlet locations.
| Locations | ||
|---|---|---|
| One inlet in the middle | 372.3 | 24.2 |
| Four inlets at the corner | 325.9 | 67.1 |
| Four inlets in the middle | 320.9 | 91.3 |