| Literature DB >> 35564147 |
Jiangfeng Gong1, Hao Li1, Kaixiao Zhang1, Zhupeng Zhang1, Jie Cao1, Zhibin Shao1, Chunmei Tang1, Shaojie Fu2, Qianjin Wang2, Xiang Wu3.
Abstract
Aqueous multivalent ion batteries, especially aqueous zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs), have promising energy storage application due to their unique merits of safety, high ionic conductivity, and high gravimetric energy density. To improve their electrochemical performance, polyaniline (PANI) is often chosen to suppress cathode dissolution. Herein, this work focuses on the zinc ion storage behavior of a PANI cathode. The energy storage mechanism of PANI is associated with four types of protonated/non-protonated amine or imine. The PANI cathode achieves a high capacity of 74 mAh g-1 at 0.3 A g-1 and maintains 48.4% of its initial discharge capacity after 1000 cycles. It also demonstrates an ultrahigh diffusion coefficient of 6.25 × 10-9~7.82 × 10-8 cm-2 s-1 during discharging and 7.69 × 10-10~1.81 × 10-7 cm-2 s-1 during charging processes, which is one or two orders of magnitude higher than other reported studies. This work sheds a light on developing PANI-composited cathodes in rechargeable aqueous ZIBs energy storage devices.Entities:
Keywords: conducting polymers; polyaniline; zinc-ion batteries; zinc-ion diffusion
Year: 2022 PMID: 35564147 PMCID: PMC9103876 DOI: 10.3390/nano12091438
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1(a) SEM, (b) TEM, and (c) high-resolution TEM images of PANI film. The inset of (c) shows the corresponding SAED image. (d–f) Corresponding EDS mapping of the nitrogen (N), oxygen (O), and sulfur (S) in PANI film.
Figure 2Core level XPS of (a) N 1s and (b) S 2p.
Figure 3Electrochemical performance of PANI electrode. (a) CV curve measured at 0.1 mV s−1. (b) Typical galvanostatic charge/discharge curves scanned from 0.3 A g−1 to 2 A g−1. (c) Rate performance with the charge/discharge current densities varying from 300 to 2000 mA g−1. (d) EIS Nyquist plots and (e) cycling performance of the cell.
Figure 4Diffusion kinetics characterization of PANI cathode. (a) CV curves of PANI electrode at different scan rates. (b) log(v) vs. log(i) plots at the peak current. (c) Contribution ratio of diffusion-controlled vs. capacitive-controlled capacities obtained at 0.1 mV s−1. (d) Contribution ratio of diffusion-controlled vs. capacitive-controlled capacities at different scan rates. (e) GITT analysis results for PANI electrode and corresponding Zn2+ diffusion coefficient.
Diffusion coefficient of Zn2+ in referenced cathode materials.
| Active Materials | Electrolyte | Diffusion Coefficient | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| V2O5@CNTs | 1 M ZnSO4 | 10−10~10−8 (Discharging) | [ |
| V2O5 | 2 M ZnSO4 | 1.32 × 10−12 (Discharging) | [ |
| V2O5·nH2O | 2 M ZnSO4 | 2.4 × 10−9 (Discharging) | [ |
| PANI−VOH | 3 M Zn(CF3SO3)2 | 10−16~10−13 (Discharging) | [ |
| V2O5 | ZnSO4 | 10−11~10−9 (Discharging) | [ |
| MnVO/VOH | 3 M Zn(CF3SO3)2 | 3.22 × 10−12~(Discharging) | [ |
| Mn0.15V2O5·nH2O | 1 M Zn(ClO4)2 | 10−12~10−10 (Discharging) | [ |
| Graphene Scroll | 2 M ZnSO4 | 10−17~10−12 (Discharging) | [ |
| MnO2 nanospheres | 2 M ZnSO4 | 10−15~10−12 (Discharging) | [ |
| δ-MnO2 | 3 M ZnSO4 | 10−13~10−9 (Discharging) | [ |
| (NH4)2V10O25·8H2O | 3 M Zn(CF3SO3)2 | 10−10~10−9 (Discharging) | [ |
| V5O12·6H2O (VOH) | 3 M Zn(CF3SO3)2 | 10−11~10−10 (Discharging) | [ |
| K2V8O21 | 2 M ZnSO4 | 1.99 × 10−11~2.23 × 10−10 | [ |
| PANI | 2 M Zn(CF3SO3)2 | 6.25×10−9~7.82 × 10−8 | This work |
Figure 5Structure evolution of PANI electrode during cycling. (a) Evolution of ex situ N 1s XPS spectra during the charge/discharge process labeled as I−V in the left panel. (b) The calculated N contents from N 1s XPS.
Figure 6Diagram showing the sequential transformation of protonated and non-protonated PANI. Zn2+ adsorption and desorption at the active sites supplied by protonated amine and imine during the process.