| Literature DB >> 35563940 |
Morad Chadni1, Emilie Isidore1, Etienne Diemer1,2, Otmane Ouguir1, Fanny Brunois1, Régis Catteau3, Laurent Cassan3, Irina Ioannou1.
Abstract
Chlorogenic acids are major phenolic constituents in many herbal medicines and exhibit various bioactivities that explain the growing interest in extracting chlorogenic acids from biomass. In this context, the present study aims to maximize 3-O-Caffeoylquinic acid (3-CQA) and 3,5-O-di-caffeoylquinic acid (3,5-diCQA) contents from forced witloof chicory roots and to analyze the extraction kinetic modelling. First, the solid-liquid ratio, ethanol concentration, extraction time and temperature were studied. The extraction conditions were optimized to maximize the extraction of these compounds. The maximum yields reached 5 ± 0.11 and 5.97 ± 0.30 mg/g dry matter (DM) for 3-O-Caffeoylquinic acid and 3,5-O-di-caffeoylquinic acid, respectively, in less than 6 min at 70 °C. Extraction with water as a solvent was assessed with the aim of proposing a second greener and less-expensive solvent. This extraction is very fast from 90 °C, with a maximum of 6.22 ± 0.18 mg/gDM of 3-O-Caffeoylquinic acid, and instantaneous for 3,5-O-di-caffeoylquinic acid with a maximum of 6.44 ± 0.59 mg/gDM. In the second step, response surface methodology was employed to optimize the ultrasound-assisted extraction of antioxidants. The higher antioxidant activities were found at temperatures from 40 °C and at percentages of ethanol in the range of 35-70%.Entities:
Keywords: 3,5-O-di-caffeoylquinic acid; Cichorium intybus L.; chlorogenic acids; extraction; food by-products; forced witloof chicory roots; kinetic modelling; polyphenolic compounds; solid–liquid extraction; ultrasound-assisted extraction
Year: 2022 PMID: 35563940 PMCID: PMC9102191 DOI: 10.3390/foods11091217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Forced witloof chicory roots before and after washing.
Variables and levels used in the Box–Behnken design.
| Factors Level (Code) | Response | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run Order | Amplitude | Ethanol | Temperature | mg Trolox/gDM |
|
| 20 (−1) | 0 (−1) | 47.5 (0) | 4.52 |
| 6 | 100 (+1) | 0 (−1) | 47.5 (0) | 4.18 |
| 14 | 20 (−1) | 100 (+1) | 47.5 (0) | 6.54 |
| 9 | 100 (+1) | 100 (+1) | 47.5 (0) | 7.35 |
| 8 | 20 (−1) | 50 (0) | 25 (−1) | 17.53 |
| 2 | 100 (+1) | 50 (0) | 25 (−1) | 17.24 |
| 1 | 20 (−1) | 50 (0) | 70 (+1) | 24.78 |
| 4 | 100 (+1) | 50 (0) | 70 (+1) | 21.98 |
| 15 | 60 (0) | 0 (−1) | 25 (−1) | 5.62 |
| 3 | 60 (0) | 100 (+1) | 25 (−1) | 3.25 |
| 10 | 60 (0) | 0 (−1) | 70 (+1) | 5.30 |
| 11 | 60 (0) | 100 (+1) | 70 (+1) | 7.19 |
| 13 | 60 (0) | 50 (0) | 47.5 (0) | 20.79 |
| 12 | 60 (0) | 50 (0) | 47.5 (0) | 19.11 |
| 5 | 60 (0) | 50 (0) | 47.5 (0) | 21.18 |
Figure 2Effect of the percentage of ethanol in the extraction solvent on the extraction yield of 3-O-CQA and 3,5-O-di-CQA at (T = 30 °C; S/L = 1/50; t = 24 h). Bars with different small letters indicate significant differences in the yield of 3-O-CQA (p > 0.05) according to the Tukey test at 95%. Bars with different capital letters indicate significant differences in the yield of 3,5-O-di-CQA.
Figure 3Effect of the solid–liquid ratio on the extraction yield of 3-O-CQA and 3,5-O-di-CQA (T = 30 °C; Solvent = 70% ethanol; t = 24 h). Bars with different small letters indicate significant differences in the yield of 3-O-CQA (p > 0.05) according to the Tukey test at 95%. Bars with different capital letters indicate significant differences in the yield of 3,5-O-di-CQA.
Figure 4Effect of the temperature of extraction on the kinetics of the extraction of 3-O-CQA in 70% ethanol (A) and water (B) and 3,5-O-di-CQA in 70% ethanol (C) and water (D). (symbols—experimental yields; lines—approximation curves).
Values of Peleg’s constants with correlation coefficient and the root mean square error (RMSE) in 70% ethanol and water at different temperatures.
| Chlorogenic Acid | Solvent | Temperature °C | K1 (min gDM/mg) | K2 (gDM/mg) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3- | 70% Ethanol | 70 | NV | NV | NV | NV |
| 60 | 0.0049 ± 0.0003 | 0.2043 ± 0.0032 | 0.9984 | 0.0763 | ||
| 50 | 0.0194 ± 0.0007 | 0.2061 ± 0.0044 | 0.9982 | 0.0786 | ||
| 40 | 0.0834 ± 0.0051 | 0.2105 ± 0.0078 | 0.9933 | 0.1642 | ||
| 25 | 0.0622 ± 0.0020 | 0.2194 ± 0.0008 | 0.9979 | 0.0787 | ||
| Water | 90 | 0.0051 ± 0.0009 | 0.1677 ± 0.0013 | 0.9936 | 0.1724 | |
| 70 | 1.3101 ± 0.1833 | 0.1875 ± 0.0366 | 0.9869 | 0.3218 | ||
| 60 | 5.7985 ± 0.0001 | 0.0947 ± 0.0002 | 0.9782 | 0.2538 | ||
| 50 | 0.9648 ± 0.4278 | 1.0397 ± 0.3028 | 0.8466 | 0.1471 | ||
| 40 | NV | NV | NV | NV | ||
| 25 | NV | NV | NV | NV | ||
| 3,5- | 70% Ethanol | 70 | NV | NV | NV | NV |
| 60 | 0.0129 ± 0.0166 | 0.1662 ± 0.0043 | 0.9973 | 0.1214 | ||
| 50 | 0.0202 ± 0.0002 | 0.1701 ± 0.0045 | 0.9983 | 0.0934 | ||
| 40 | 0.0405 ± 0.0021 | 0.1722 ± 0.0984 | 0.9908 | 0.2383 | ||
| 25 | 0.0473 ± 0.0045 | 0.1908± 0.0845 | 0.9977 | 0.0944 | ||
| Water | 90 | NV | NV | NV | NV | |
| 70 | 1.7362 ± 0.2126 | 0.1832 ± 0.0008 | 0.9903 | 0.2038 | ||
| 60 | 11.6290 ± 0.0480 | NV | 0.9703 | 0.2230 | ||
| 50 | 11.8233 ± 0.4521 | 0.6735 ± 0.0766 | 0.9694 | 0.0680 | ||
| 40 | NV | NV | NV | NV | ||
| 25 | NV | NV | NV | NV |
NV means non-validated data due to the very low yield of extraction, the isomerization of chlorogenic acids or to the instantaneous extraction (not enough points to draw the curve).
Figure 5Thermal stability of CGAs in aqueous chicory roots extract at 90 °C.
Figure 6Isomerization reaction of 3,5-O-di-CQA to 4,5-O-di-CQA.
Model equation coefficients and statistical parameters.
| Coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|
| Constant | 20.354 | <0.001 |
| Amplitude (Amp) | −0.250 | 0.632 NS |
| Ethanol (Eth) | 0.445 | 0.286 NS |
| Temperature (Temp) | 1.475 | 0.003 |
| Amp × Amp | 0.095 | 0.868 NS |
| Eth × Eth | −8.502 | <0.001 |
| Temp × Temp | −0.081 | 0.888 NS |
| Amp × Eth | 0.166 | 0.764 NS |
| Amp × Temp | −0.362 | 0.520 NS |
| Eth × Temp | 0.614 | 0.292 NS |
| ANOVA: | ||
NS = Non-significant.
Figure 7The 4D contour plots of the response, describing the antioxidant activity (AA) of the extract according to the extraction temperature, ethanol percentage and ultrasound amplitude.
Optimal extraction conditions and validation of the experimental and predicted antioxidant activity obtained under the same conditions.
| Response Variable | Optimum Extraction Conditions | Maximum Values | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethanol (%) | Temperature (°C) | Amplitude (%) | Predicted | Experimental | |
| Antioxidant activity of extracts (mg TE/gDM) | 50 | 70 | 0 | 21.80 ± 1.09 | 25.88 ± 0.29 |