| Literature DB >> 35563898 |
Yu Lu1, Siming Zhao1, Caihua Jia1, Yan Xu1, Binjia Zhang1, Meng Niu1.
Abstract
Chinese water chestnut (CWC) has become one of the most popular foods in China. The textural properties of food contribute considerably to consumer preferences. Fresh fruits and vegetables are normally softened after thermal treatment. However, CWC retains most of its crispness and hardness after steaming. To explore the relationship between thermal processes and sensory changes, a method for measuring the texture of CWC is warranted. This study aimed to examine the textural properties of CWC subjected to varying degrees of thermal treatments using instrumental and sensory methods. Instrumental tests included the shear force test and puncture test, while trained panelists assessed the sensory attributes. Two sensory attributes were selected for evaluation: crispness and hardness. The results indicated that with the extension of thermal treatment time, the crispness and hardness of CWC decreased slightly, while cells and starch grains were damaged. Sensory results showed a significant correlation with shear force index (slope of rising curve) (p < 0.05) and puncture index (slope of rising curve, slope of descending curve and compression work) (p < 0.05). Thereafter, the instrumental tests parameters could be used to establish regression models for predicting crispness and hardness and controlling the quality of CWC products.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese water chestnut; correlation; textural properties; thermal treatment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35563898 PMCID: PMC9100216 DOI: 10.3390/foods11091175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
The descriptions of the texture grades for the CWC.
| Texture Grade | Semantic Description | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Hardest (Crispest) | The pulp was hard and very juicy | 8~10 |
| Harder (Crisper) | The pulp was crisp and juicy | 6~8 |
| Hard (Crisp) | The pulp was not crisp like fresh fruits | 4~6 |
| Less Hard (Less Crisp) | The pulp chewed somewhat gritty and had a little juice | 2~4 |
| Least Hard (Least Crisp) | The pulp chewed like flour and had less juice | 0~2 |
The effect of steaming time on hardness and crispness of CWC.
| Steaming Time | Sensory Score of Hardness | Sensory Score of Crispness |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 9.10 ± 0.74 a | 8.30 ± 1.99 a |
| 5 | 7.10 ± 1.67 b | 7.40 ± 1.34 ab |
| 10 | 7.00 ± 1.58 b | 7.00 ± 0.71 ab |
| 15 | 7.50 ± 1.12 b | 6.60 ± 0.55 b |
| 20 | 6.90 ± 1.02 b | 6.40 ± 0.89 b |
| 25 | 6.20 ± 0.84 b | 6.60 ± 1.14 b |
| 30 | 6.60 ± 0.89 b | 6.40 ± 0.55 b |
Values followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
The range analysis results of shear force test.
| Maximum Force/g | Compression Work/(g·mm) | Return Work/(g·mm) | Slope of Descending Curve/(g/mm) | Constant of Descending Curve/(g/mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A) Pre-test speed/(mm/s) | K1 | 236.8 | 652.4 | 75.2 | 1416.9 | 3015.1 |
| K2 | 298.4 | 707.4 | 99.0 | 1115.8 | 2481.4 | |
| K3 | 253.2 | 676.1 | 76.1 | 1431.1 | 2994.8 | |
| R | 61.5 | 55.0 | 23.8 | 315.3 | 533.7 | |
| (B) Testing speed/(mm/s) | K1 | 287.7 | 218.2 | 54.2 | 1156.7 | 1017.6 |
| K2 | 305.9 | 639.4 | 96.6 | 1360.3 | 2832.6 | |
| K3 | 194.8 | 1178.2 | 99.5 | 1446.9 | 4641.1 | |
| R | 111.1 | 960.0 | 45.3 | 290.2 | 3623.5 | |
| (C) Post-test speed/(mm/s) | K1 | 287.7 | 218.2 | 54.2 | 1156.7 | 1017.6 |
| K2 | 305.9 | 639.4 | 96.6 | 1360.3 | 2832.6 | |
| K3 | 194.8 | 1178.2 | 99.5 | 1446.9 | 4641.1 | |
| R | 111.1 | 960.0 | 45.3 | 290.2 | 3623.5 | |
| (D) Compression ratio/% | K1 | 287.7 | 218.2 | 54.2 | 1156.7 | 1017.6 |
| K2 | 305.9 | 639.4 | 96.6 | 1360.3 | 2832.6 | |
| K3 | 194.8 | 1178.2 | 99.5 | 1446.9 | 4641.1 | |
| R | 111.1 | 960.0 | 45.3 | 290.2 | 3623.5 | |
| optimal experimental conditions | A1B3C3D3 | A1B1C1D1 | A1B1C1D1 | A2B1C1D1 | A2B1C1D1 | |
The range analysis results of the puncture test.
| Maximum Force/g | Compression Work/(g·mm) | Return Work/(g·mm) | Slope of Descending Curve/(g/mm) | Constant of Descending Curve/(g/mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A) Pre-test speed/(mm/s) | K1 | 530.2 | 448.6 | 50.3 | 41,616.6 | 48,762.6 |
| K2 | 514.4 | 216.6 | 299.0 | 13,216.5 | 60,765.1 | |
| K3 | 713.2 | 387.4 | 107.2 | 26,709.7 | 31,868.0 | |
| R | 198.8 | 231.9 | 248.7 | 28,400.1 | 28,897.2 | |
| (B) Testing speed/(mm/s) | K1 | 987.4 | 363.0 | 273.5 | 50,860.4 | 106,366.9 |
| K2 | 413.8 | 364.7 | 94.2 | 18,865.4 | 20,568.1 | |
| K3 | 356.7 | 324.8 | 88.7 | 11,816.9 | 14,460.7 | |
| R | 630.7 | 39.9 | 184.8 | 39,043.5 | 91,906.2 | |
| (C) Post-test speed/(mm/s) | K1 | 987.4 | 363.0 | 273.5 | 50,860.4 | 106,366.9 |
| K2 | 413.8 | 364.7 | 94.2 | 18,865.4 | 20,568.1 | |
| K3 | 356.7 | 324.8 | 88.7 | 11,816.9 | 14,460.7 | |
| R | 630.7 | 39.9 | 184.8 | 39,043.5 | 91,906.2 | |
| (D) Compression ratio/% | K1 | 987.4 | 363.0 | 273.5 | 50,860.4 | 106,366.9 |
| K2 | 413.8 | 364.7 | 94.2 | 18,865.4 | 20,568.1 | |
| K3 | 356.7 | 324.8 | 88.7 | 11,816.9 | 14,460.7 | |
| R | 630.7 | 39.9 | 184.8 | 39,043.5 | 91,906.2 | |
| optimal experimental conditions | A2B3C3D3 | A2B3C3D3 | A1B3C3D3 | A2B3C3D3 | A3B3C3D3 | |
Figure 1The results of the instrumental test. (A) slope of the rising curve; (B) slope of the descending curve; (C) compression work; (D) return work; (E) maximum force.
Figure 2The images of the cell and starch. (A) without steaming; (B) steaming for 10 min; (C) steaming for 20 min; (D) steaming for 30 min.
The dependence analysis of the instrumental and sensory assessments.
| Index | Slope of Rising Curve/(g/mm) | Slope of Descending Curve/(g/mm) | Compression Work | Return Work | Maximum Force/g |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shear force indexes | |||||
| Hardness | 0.905 *** | −0.724 * | 0.717 * | 0.646 | 0.397 |
| Crispness | 0.890 *** | −0.782 ** | 0.889 *** | 0.818 ** | 0.644 |
| Puncture indexes | |||||
| Hardness | 0.855 ** | −0.901 *** | −0.760 ** | −0.536 | 0.242 |
| Crispness | 0.783 ** | −0.868 ** | −0.9038 *** | −0.6022 | 0.4209 |
*, **, *** mean the correlation were significant at the 0.1, 0.05, and 0.01, respectively.