| Literature DB >> 35563712 |
Valentina Di Felice1, Rosario Barone1, Eleonora Trovato1, Daniela D'Amico1,2, Filippo Macaluso3,4, Claudia Campanella1, Antonella Marino Gammazza1, Vera Muccilli5, Vincenzo Cunsolo5, Patrizia Cancemi6, Gabriele Multhoff7, Dario Coletti8,9, Sergio Adamo8,9, Felicia Farina1, Francesco Cappello1,4.
Abstract
Currently, no commercially available drugs have the ability to reverse cachexia or counteract muscle wasting and the loss of lean mass. Here, we report the methodology used to develop Physiactisome-a conditioned medium released by heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60)-overexpressing C2C12 cell lines enriched with small and large extracellular vesicles. We also present evidence supporting its use in the treatment of cachexia. Briefly, we obtain a nanovesicle-based secretion by genetically modifying C2C12 cell lines with an Hsp60-overexpressing plasmid. The secretion is used to treat naïve C2C12 cell lines. Physiactisome activates the expression of PGC-1α isoform 1, which is directly involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and muscle atrophy suppression, in naïve C2C12 cell lines. Proteomic analyses show Hsp60 localisation inside isolated nanovesicles and the localisation of several apocrine and merocrine molecules, with potential benefits for severe forms of muscle atrophy. Considering that Physiactisome can be easily obtained following tissue biopsy and can be applied to autologous muscle stem cells, we propose a potential nanovesicle-based anti-cachexia drug that could mimic the beneficial effects of exercise. Thus, Physiactisome may improve patient survival and quality of life. Furthermore, the method used to add Hsp60 into nanovesicles can be used to deliver other drugs or active proteins to vesicles.Entities:
Keywords: cachexia; exercise; exosome; muscle atrophy; muscle wasting; sarcopenia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35563712 PMCID: PMC9100106 DOI: 10.3390/cells11091406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 7.666
Forward and reverse primers used for qRT-PCR.
| Primer | Target Sequence | Forward | Reverse |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| [ | 5′-TGATGTGAATGACTTGGATACAGACA-3′ | 5′-GCTCATTGTTGTACTGGTTGGATATG-3′ |
|
| [ | 5′-GGACATGTGCAGCCAAGACTCT-3′ | 5′-CACTTCAATCCACCCAGAAAGCT-3′ |
|
| MGI:MGI:95640 | 5′-CAAGGACACTGAGCAAGAGA-3′ | 5′-GCCCCTCCTGTTATTATGGG-3′ |
Figure 1C2C12 cell lines secrete extracellular vesicles (EVs). (A) Electron microscopy analyses of 3D cultures of C2C12 cell lines show the presence of budding intermediates (nascent vesicles, black arrows) at the plasma membrane or already budded vesicles with an average diameter of 80 nm (black arrows). (B,C) Transmission electron microscopy showing immunogold labelling of Alix (a known marker of small EVs) in nanovesicles from the 3D cultures of C2C12 cell lines (10 nm gold particles).
Figure 2ζ-Potential measurements of particles in the C2C12 culture medium, following centrifugation at 15,000× g (large EVs, (A)) and at 110,000× g (small EVs, (B)).
Figure 3Western blot analysis of large extracellular vesicles (EVs), small EVs, and total lysates from C2C12 cell lines (10 μg of protein per lane) to detect the expression of Alix, calnexin, HSP70, and RAB5. Β-Actin was used as a loading control.
Figure 4(A) Venn diagram showing the identified proteins (unique, common, and up-/down-regulated) between large extracellular vesicles (EVs) and small EVs. (B) Volcano plot of significant proteins differentially expressed between large EVs and small EVs. The X axis represents the fold change of differentially accumulated proteins represented with the ratio (large/small EVs), and the Y axis represents the corresponding significance. Fold change ≥ 2 and t-test with a p < 0.05 were set as the significance threshold for differential expression. Green represents downregulated proteins, and red represents upregulated proteins (large EVs/small EVs).
Figure 5Interaction diagrams of proteins identified in large extracellular vesicles (EVs) and small EVs created using FunRich. The list of total proteins identified in large EVs (A) and small EVs (B) was uploaded, and interaction analysis tool was used to obtain the diagrams. The red and green spheres indicate the input proteins (selected genes) and the interacting proteins (interacting genes), respectively.
Figure 6Bars show the transcript level expression of PGC1α isoforms (PGC1α total (α tot), isoform 1 (α 1)) as revealed by real-time PCR (values are normalised to those of the reference genes). Fold change was calculated according to the Livak Method (2−ΔΔCT) in C2C12 cell lines (naïve) treated with Physiactisome (A) or C2C12 cell lines (naïve) treated with recombinant human Hsp60 (hrHsp60, (B)).
Figure 7(A) Sequence coverage map of Hsp60 (UniProt accession no., P63038) obtained by tryptic digestion and nUHPLC/HR nESI-MS/MS. Peptides identified in the extracellular vesicle (EV) samples are shown in bold; peptides identified in the small EVs sample are underlined. (B) Quantification of Hsp60 levels between large and small EVs.