| Literature DB >> 35563555 |
Yuta Uenoyama1, Atsushi Matsuda1, Kazune Ohashi1, Koji Ueda1, Misaki Yokoyama1, Takuya Kyoutou1, Kouji Kishi2, Youichi Takahama1, Masaaki Nagai3, Takaaki Ohbayashi3, Osamu Hotta4, Hideki Matsuzaki1.
Abstract
Aberrant glycosylation of IgA1 is involved in the development of IgA nephropathy (IgAN). There are many reports of IgAN markers focusing on the glycoform of IgA1. None have been clinically applied as a routine test. In this study, we established an automated sandwich immunoassay system for detecting aberrant glycosylated IgA1, using Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA) and anti-IgA1 monoclonal antibody. The diagnostic performance as an IgAN marker was evaluated. The usefulness of WFA for immunoassays was investigated by lectin microarray. A reliable standard for quantitative immunoassay measurements was designed by modifying a purified IgA1 substrate. A validation study using multiple serum specimens was performed using the established WFA-antibody sandwich automated immunoassay. Lectin microarray results showed that WFA specifically recognized N-glycans of agglutinated IgA1 in IgAN patients. The constructed IgA1 standard exhibited a wide dynamic range and high reactivity. In the validation study, serum WFA-reactive IgA1 (WFA+-IgA1) differed significantly between healthy control subjects and IgAN patients. The findings indicate that WFA is a suitable lectin that specifically targets abnormal agglutinated IgA1 in serum. We also describe an automated immunoassay system for detecting WFA+-IgA1, focusing on N-glycans.Entities:
Keywords: IgA nephropathy; Wisteria floribunda agglutinin; agglutinated IgA1; automated immunoassay; glyco-diagnosis; immunocomplex; lectin; lectin microarray
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35563555 PMCID: PMC9104065 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23095165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Verification of WFA binding to serum-agglutinated IgA1. (a) Silver stain of immunoprecipitated fraction with anti-IgA1 mAb. (b) Western blot analysis of WFA-immunoprecipitated fraction detected with anti-IgA1 mAb. MW; molecular weight, HCs; healthy control subjects.
Figure 2Correlation between glycan profiling of IgA1 and WFA+-IgA1 CLEIA. (a) SDS-PAGE and silver staining of IgA1 purified by immunoprecipitation from serum. Electrophoresis was performed under the reducing condition. (b) Typical images of signals of 45 lectins in the lectin microarray analysis of HC and IgAN patients. (c) WFA signals of each IgA1 derived from three HC and three IgAN patients. (d) Two-dimensional plot of WFA signals and chemiluminescent counts of WFA+-IgA1 CLEIA.
Figure 3Construction and evaluation of standard IgA1 for automated immunoassay system. (a) Illustrations of mono (nIgA1) and polymeric IgA1 (Glt-IgA1) standards. (b) Evaluation of each IgA1 standard. SDS-PAGE and silver stain were performed under the non-reducing condition. The standards were analyzed by size exclusion chromatography. Black and blue lines indicate nIgA1 and Glt-IgA1, respectively. (c) WFA signals evident in differential glycan analysis with antibody-overlay lectin microarray of standards. nIgA1 represents without sialidase digestion Glt-IgA1 Sia (+) and Sia (−) denotes presence and absence, respectively, of sialidase digestion. (d) Differential measurements of constructed standard IgA1 by HISCL an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay system. Each standard was compared with (+) or without (−) sialidase digestion. (e) Linear responsibility of chemiluminescent count and concentration of Glt-IgA1 with sialidase digestion.
Figure 4Measurement of serum WFA+-IgA1 levels with automated CLEIA. (a) Serum WFA+-IgA1 levels in HCs (N = 50), non-IgAN patients (N = 43), and IgAN patients (N = 47). (b) Comparison of serum WFA+-IgA1 levels before and after tonsillectomy in IgAN patients (N = 38). Values that significantly differed between each subject group were identified by the Mann–Whitney U test. The medians of each group are shown as the red bar. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, ns; not significant.
Clinical features of each marker in HS, non-IgAN, and IgAN patients.
| HCs ( | Non-IgAN ( | IgAN ( | HCs vs. IgAN | non-IgAN vs. IgAN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IgA (mg/dL) | 212.0 ± 109.9 | 218.0 ± 121.4 | 270.0 ± 108.8 | ||
| C3 (mg/dL) | 156.0 ± 409.6 | 116.0 ± 23.8 | 113.5 ± 21.0 | ns 2 | |
| IgA/C3 | 1.32 ± 23.8 | 1.95 ± 23.8 | 2.28 ± 23.8 | ||
| Gd-IgA (ng/mL) | 23.2 ± 14.0 | 22.2 ± 14.3 | 33.5 ± 14.7 | ||
| WFA+-IgA1 (ng/mL) | 474.5 ± 271.1 | 506.0 ± 468.0 | 579.4 ± 468.0 | ns |
1 47 cases of IgAN patients before tonsillectomy. 2 ns, not significant. Each value represents median ± standard deviation.
Comparative analysis of single and combined markers for IgAN diagnosis.
| Marker(s) | AUC (95% CI) | Sensitivity (%) * | Specificity (%) * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single marker | WFA+-IgA1 | 0.634 (0.523–0.745) | 0.0234 | 66.0 | 62.0 |
| Gd-IgA1 | 0.734 (0.649–0.819) | <0.0001 | 72.3 | 69.6 | |
| Total IgA | 0.670 (0.579–0.762) | 0.0011 | 89.4 | 43.5 | |
| C3 | 0.709 (0.624–0.793) | <0.0001 | 87.5 | 52.7 | |
| Combination | WFA-Gd | 0.748 (0.651–0.820) | <0.0001 | 74.5 | 67.7 |
| WFA-Total | 0.660 (0.569–0.752) | 0.0021 | 80.9 | 51.7 | |
| WFA/C3 | 0.704 (0.616–0.792) | <0.0001 | 78.7 | 62.6 | |
| WFA-Gd/C3 | 0.789 (0.714–0.865) | <0.0001 | 83.0 | 70.3 |
* The cutoff values obtained from Youden’s index. AUC, area under the ROC curve; WFA-Gd, combination of WFA+-IgA1 and Gd-IgA1; WFA-Total, combination of WFA+-IgA1 and total IgA; WFA/C3, combination of WFA+-IgA1 and C3; WFA-Gd/C3, combination of WFA+-IgA1, Gd-IgA1, and C3; CI, confidence interval.