| Literature DB >> 35563121 |
Jeanne Fèvre1, Elena Leveille1, Aurélie Jeanson1, Sabine Santucci-Darmanin2, Valérie Pierrefite-Carle2, Georges F Carle2, Christophe Den Auwer1, Christophe Di Giorgio1.
Abstract
In case of an incident in the nuclear industry or an act of war or terrorism, the dissemination of plutonium could contaminate the environment and, hence, humans. Human contamination mainly occurs via inhalation and/or wounding (and, less likely, ingestion). In such cases, plutonium, if soluble, reaches circulation, whereas the poorly soluble fraction (such as small colloids) is trapped in alveolar macrophages or remains at the site of wounding. Once in the blood, the plutonium is delivered to the liver and/or to the bone, particularly into its mineral part, mostly composed of hydroxyapatite. Countermeasures against plutonium exist and consist of intravenous injections or inhalation of diethylenetetraminepentaacetate salts. Their effectiveness is, however, mainly confined to the circulating soluble forms of plutonium. Furthermore, the short bioavailability of diethylenetetraminepentaacetate results in its rapid elimination. To overcome these limitations and to provide a complementary approach to this common therapy, we developed polymeric analogs to indirectly target the problematic retention sites. We present herein a first study regarding the decontamination abilities of polyethyleneimine methylcarboxylate (structural diethylenetetraminepentaacetate polymer analog) and polyethyleneimine methylphosphonate (phosphonate polymeric analog) directed against Th(IV), used here as a Pu(IV) surrogate, which was incorporated into hydroxyapatite used as a bone model. Our results suggest that polyethylenimine methylphosphonate could be a good candidate for powerful bone decontamination action.Entities:
Keywords: DTPA; PEI-MP; actinides; chelating polymers; decontamination
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35563121 PMCID: PMC9100511 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Chemical structures of the chelating polymers carrying carboxylic or phosphonic functions and their reference molecular analogs.
Figure 2Graph representing the mean percentage of cell viability for MLO-A5 or SAOS-2 cells treated with increasing concentrations of chelates for 24 or 48 h. Error bars represent the SD. The mean and the SD were calculated from independent experiments (n = 3). * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.005, NS (not significant), according to t-test results (equal means) of DTPA or PEI-MP when inferior to their respective blank (untreated MLO-A5 or SAOS-2 cells at the corresponding time).
Figure 3Thermograms of HAp, HAp…PEI-MP, HAp…PEI-MC, and HAp…DTPA in the 100–700 °C range showing the percentage of mass loss due to the organic part (chelates).
Figure 4Th LIII edge experimental EXAFS spectra of PEI-MP–Th (green), PEI-MP–Th–HAp (black), and HAp–Th (red). Fits are shown in dotted line.
EXAFS best-fit parameters for HAp–Th, PEI-MP–Th, and PEI-MP–HAp–Th under (pseudo)physiological conditions a.
|
|
|
|
|
| HAp–Th | 2.0 (1) O at 2.32 (3) Å | 1 P at 3.21 (3) Å | S02 = 1.0 |
| 4.0 (1) O at 2.45 (2) Å | |||
| 2.0 (1) O at 2.59 (5) Å | |||
| PEI-MP–Th | 9 O at 2.36 (1) Å | 2.8 P at 3.88 (4) Å | S02 = 1.0 |
| PEI-MP–HAp–Th | 9 O at 2.37 (2) Å | 2.8 P at 3.82 (9) Å | S02 = 1.0 |
a σ2 is the Debye–Waller factor of the considered scattering path. S02 is the global amplitude factor, e0 is the energy threshold, Rfactor is the agreement factor of the fit in percentage, and Q is the quality factor (reduced chi2) of the fit. Uncertainties given in brackets are related to the last digit. Numbers in italics were fixed. For HAp–Th, the sum of the coordination numbers of the oxygen atoms was fixed to 8, and the coordination numbers for the second sphere were fixed to the corresponding crystallographic phase of Th4(PO4)4P2O7. The coordination numbers for PEI-MP–Th were fixed to the values obtained in the previous study [17].
Figure 5Dose–response curves of HAp–Th (5 mg, 0.7% Th) versus monomer chelate in 1.5 mL of TBS at day 8.
Figure 6Decontamination kinetics of HAp–Th (5 mg, 0.7% Th) in the presence of 6.3 mM chelate in 1.5 mL of TBS over 21 days.
Effect of cumulative dose administration.
| Th % Removal at d12 | Total Th % Removal at d21 | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 dose only from d1 | 38.2 ± 0.85 | 46.1 b ± 0.52 |
| 2 doses a | 35.8 ± 0.49 | 64.9 b,c ± 0.98 |
a Independent experiment: medium was withdrawn at d12 and replaced with a fresh amount of 6.3 mM monomer PEI-MP. b Probability p (same mean as d12) < 0.005. c Probability p (same mean with one or two doses) < 0.005.