| Literature DB >> 35559891 |
Araceli Sánchez Jiménez1, Raquel Puelles2, Marta Perez-Fernandez2, Leire Barruetabeña3, Nicklas Raun Jacobsen4, Blanca Suarez-Merino5, Christian Micheletti5, Nicolas Manier6, Beatrice Salieri7, Roland Hischier8, Rositsa Tsekovska9, Yordan Handzhiyski9, Jacques Bouillard6, Yohan Oudart10, Karen S Galea11, Sean Kelly12, Neeraj Shandilya13, Henk Goede13, Julio Gomez-Cordon2, Keld Alstrup Jensen4, Martie van Tongeren14, Margarita D Apostolova9, Isabel Rodríguez Llopis3.
Abstract
Expectations for safer and sustainable chemicals and products are growing to comply with the United Nations and European strategies for sustainability. The application of Safe(r) by Design (SbD) in nanotechnology implies an iterative process where functionality, human health and safety, environmental and economic impact and cost are assessed and balanced as early as possible in the innovation process and updated at each step. The EU H2020 NanoReg2 project was the first European project to implement SbD in six companies handling and/or manufacturing nanomaterials (NMs) and nano-enabled products (NEP). The results from this experience have been used to develop these guidelines on the practical application of SbD. The SbD approach foresees the identification, estimation, and reduction of human and environmental risks as early as possible in the development of a NM or NEP, and it is based on three pillars: (i) safer NMs and NEP; (ii) safer use and end of life and (iii) safer industrial production. The presented guidelines include a set of information and tools that will help deciding at each step of the innovation process whether to continue, apply SbD measures or carry out further tests to reduce uncertainty. It does not intend to be a prescriptive protocol where all suggested steps have to be followed to achieve a SbD NM/NEP or process. Rather, the guidelines are designed to identify risks at an early state and information to be considered to identify those risks. Each company adapts the approach to its specific needs and circumstances as company decisions influence the way forward.Entities:
Keywords: Life cycle assessment; Nano-enabled products; Nanoform; Nanoparticles; Nanoscience; Risk assessment; Safer by design
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35559891 DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2022.100385
Source DB: PubMed Journal: NanoImpact ISSN: 2452-0748