Literature DB >> 35559842

Variation in dissolution behavior among different nanoforms and its implication for grouping approaches in inhalation toxicity.

Johannes G Keller1, Michael Persson2, Philipp Müller3, Lan Ma-Hock4, Kai Werle5, Josje Arts6, Robert Landsiedel7, Wendel Wohlleben8.   

Abstract

Different nanoforms (NF) of the same substance each need to be registered under REACH, but similarities in physiological interaction -among them biodissolution- can justify read-across within a group of NFs, thereby reducing the need to perform animal studies. Here we focused on the endpoint of inhalation toxicity and explored how differences in physical parameters of 17 NFs of silica, and organic and inorganic pigments impact dissolution rates, half-times, and transformation under both pH 7.4 lung lining conditions and pH 4.5 lysosomal conditions. We benchmarked our observations against well-known TiO2, BaSO4 and ZnO nanomaterials, representing very slow, partial and quick dissolution respectively. By automated image evaluation, structural transformations were observed for dissolution rates in the order of 0.1 to 10 ng/cm2/h, but did not provide additional decision criteria on the similarity of NFs. Dissolution half-times spanned nearly five orders of magnitude, mostly dictated by the substance and simulant fluid, but modulated up to ten-fold by the subtle differences between NFs. Physiological time scales and benchmark materials help to frame the biologically relevant range, proposed as 1 h to 1 y. NFs of ZnO, Ag, SiO2, BaSO4 were in this range. We proposed numerical rules of pairwise similarity within a group, of which the worst case NF would be further assessed by in vivo inhalation studies. These rules divided the colloidal silica NFs into two separate candidate groups, one with Al-doping, one without. Shape or silane surface treatment were less important. The dissolution halftimes of many organic and inorganic pigment NFs were longer than the biologically relevant range, such that dissolution behavior is not an obstacle for their groupings.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dissolution; Extracellular conditions; Grouping; Lysosomal conditions; Transformation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35559842     DOI: 10.1016/j.impact.2021.100341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NanoImpact        ISSN: 2452-0748


  4 in total

1.  Dissolution Rate of Nanomaterials Determined by Ions and Particle Size under Lysosomal Conditions: Contributions to Standardization of Simulant Fluids and Analytical Methods.

Authors:  Ilaria Zanoni; Johannes G Keller; Ursula G Sauer; Philipp Müller; Lan Ma-Hock; Keld A Jensen; Anna Luisa Costa; Wendel Wohlleben
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.973

Review 2.  Toxicokinetics of Nanoparticles Deposited in Lungs Using Occupational Exposure Scenarios.

Authors:  Otto Creutzenberg; Gerhard Pohlmann; Dirk Schaudien; Heiko Kock
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21

3.  Surface chemistry of metal oxide nanoparticles: NMR and TGA quantification.

Authors:  Filip Kunc; Mary Gallerneault; Oltion Kodra; Andreas Brinkmann; Gregory P Lopinski; Linda J Johnston
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 4.478

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of Bioaccumulation Data for Nondissolvable Engineered Nanomaterials in Freshwater Aquatic Organisms.

Authors:  Yuanfang Zheng; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.218

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.