Guna He1,2, Lingyu Liu1,2, Xiaomei Liu1,2, Hui Guo1,2, Lingling Chen1,2, Rongzi Li1,2. 1. Department of Gynecology, Fuzhou Second Hospital, Fuzhou Second Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University China. 2. The Third Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University Fuzhou 350007, Fujian, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the difference in clinical efficacy and safety of transvaginal and transumbilical single port laparoscopy for endometrial cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively included 100 endometrial cancer patients who were admitted to the Fuzhou Second Hospital for surgical treatment from September 2020 to September 2021 and divided them into two groups according to different surgical treatment options. Patients in Group A (48 cases) were treated with transvaginal natural endoscopic surgery (TNES), and those in Group B (52 cases) were with transumbilical single port laparoscopic surgery (TSPLS). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time to postoperative exhaust, length of hospital stay, pelvic lymph node dissection, and incision infection rate of two groups were compared. The white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct) of the two groups of patients before and after the surgery were compared between the two groups, as well as th VAS score of 24 hours after the operation, rate of complications during hospitalization, satisfaction with surgery and quality of life 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Compared with Group B, the operation time and intraoperative blood loss of Group A patients were markedly increased. The time to postoperative exhaust, length of hospital stay, incision infection rate, VAS score at postoperative 24 h, and complication rate of Group A were significantly lower than that of Group B. In addition, Group A had higher performance on the number of pelvic lymph node dissections, surgical satisfaction and quality of life 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal natural cavity endoscopy had better surgical results with faster postoperative recovery and higher safety compared with TSPLS, making it valuable in clinical application and worthy of further popularization. AJTR
OBJECTIVE: To explore the difference in clinical efficacy and safety of transvaginal and transumbilical single port laparoscopy for endometrial cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively included 100 endometrial cancer patients who were admitted to the Fuzhou Second Hospital for surgical treatment from September 2020 to September 2021 and divided them into two groups according to different surgical treatment options. Patients in Group A (48 cases) were treated with transvaginal natural endoscopic surgery (TNES), and those in Group B (52 cases) were with transumbilical single port laparoscopic surgery (TSPLS). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time to postoperative exhaust, length of hospital stay, pelvic lymph node dissection, and incision infection rate of two groups were compared. The white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct) of the two groups of patients before and after the surgery were compared between the two groups, as well as th VAS score of 24 hours after the operation, rate of complications during hospitalization, satisfaction with surgery and quality of life 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: Compared with Group B, the operation time and intraoperative blood loss of Group A patients were markedly increased. The time to postoperative exhaust, length of hospital stay, incision infection rate, VAS score at postoperative 24 h, and complication rate of Group A were significantly lower than that of Group B. In addition, Group A had higher performance on the number of pelvic lymph node dissections, surgical satisfaction and quality of life 3 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal natural cavity endoscopy had better surgical results with faster postoperative recovery and higher safety compared with TSPLS, making it valuable in clinical application and worthy of further popularization. AJTR
Authors: Rajmohan Murali; Deborah F Delair; Sarah M Bean; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Robert A Soslow Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Jan Filip Baekelandt; Peter A De Mulder; Ilse Le Roy; Chantal Mathieu; Annouschka Laenen; Paul Enzlin; Steven Weyers; Ben W J Mol; Jan J A Bosteels Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-10 Impact factor: 2.692