| Literature DB >> 35558956 |
Shuquan Chang1, Heliang Fu1, Xian Wu1, Chengcheng Liu1, Zheng Li1, Yaodong Dai1, Haiqian Zhang1.
Abstract
In this work, compressible Prussian blue/polyurethane sponges (PB@PUS) for selective removal of cesium ions were prepared via an in situ radiation chemical route. The characterization results indicate that uniform PB nanoparticles were successfully synthesized and well dispersed on the porous skeleton of sponge. Batch and fixed-bed column experiments were detailedly conducted to investigate their adsorption performances. Batch adsorption experiments reveal that PB@PUS exhibited good selective removal property for cesium ions in a wide range of pH, whose maximal adsorption capacity and removal efficiency reached 68.6 mg g-1 and 99%, respectively. The adsorption processes could be described by the Langmuir isotherm adsorption model and pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetic model. The fixed-bed column experiments show that the breakthrough and exhaustion time obviously increased with the decrease of flow rate and initial cesium ions concentration. The breakthrough curves could be well fitted by the Thomas model and Yoon-Nelson model. The theoretical saturated adsorption capacity of PB@PUS-3 calculated from the Thomas model was 68.2 mg g-1. The as-prepared samples were light, stable and compressible, which can be applied in radioactive wastewater treatment. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35558956 PMCID: PMC9088821 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra07665k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1Schematic illustration for the fabrication of PB/PU sponges for cesium ions removal.
Fig. 2SEM images of pure PU and PB/PU sponges.
Fig. 3XRD patterns (A) and FT-IR spectra (B) of pure PU and PB/PU sponges.
Fig. 4Adsorption isotherms of pure PU and PB/PU sponges.
Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherm parameters
| Adsorbent | Langmuir model | Freundlich model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 1/ |
| |
| Pure PUS | 2.49 | 0.00726 | 0.994 | 0.225 | 0.340 | 0.986 |
| PB@PUS-1 | 34.9 | 0.00143 | 0.999 | 0.508 | 0.528 | 0.984 |
| PB@PUS-2 | 49.2 | 0.00182 | 0.999 | 0.969 | 0.498 | 0.976 |
| PB@PUS-3 | 68.6 | 0.00221 | 0.998 | 1.64 | 0.481 | 0.965 |
Fig. 5Adsorption kinetic curve of PB@PUS-2 sample. Data represent “mean ± SD” from three independent experiments.
Pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetic parameters
| Adsorbent | Pseudo-first-order equation | Pseudo-second-order equation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| PB@PUS-2 | 21.0 | 4.62 | 0.976 | 22.5 | 0.322 | 0.999 |
Fig. 6Cs+ removal efficiency of PB@PUS-2 sample under different adsorbent amount (A), pH (B) and competing cations (C). Data represent “mean ± SD” from three independent experiments.
Fig. 7The Cs+ adsorption breakthrough curves of PB/PU sponges under different conditions. (A) Different adsorbent fabricated under different condition (initial Cs+ concentration: 10 mg L−1, flow rate: 3 mL min−1, bed height: 10 cm); (B) effect of initial Cs+ concentration (flow rate: 3 mL min−1, bed height: 10 cm, adsorbent: PB@PUS-2); (C) effect of flow rate (bed height: 10 cm, initial Cs+ concentration: 10 mg L−1, adsorbent: PB@PUS-2).
Parameters of the fixed bed column for Cs+ removal by PB/PU sponges under different conditionsa
| Adsorbent | Experimental conditions | Experimental parameters of breakthrough curves | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| PB@PUS-1 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 32 | 5760 | 15.4 | 32.2 | 55.9 |
| PB@PUS-2 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 18 | 47 | 8460 | 30.8 | 51.8 | 61.2 |
| PB@PUS-3 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 28.5 | 52 | 9360 | 48.6 | 67.0 | 71.6 |
| PB@PUS-2 | 20 | 3 | 10 | 8 | 24 | 4320 | 27.4 | 49.2 | 57.0 |
| PB@PUS-2 | 30 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 17 | 3060 | 25.1 | 50.6 | 55.2 |
| PB@PUS-2 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 12.5 | 35 | 8400 | 28.5 | 50.3 | 59.9 |
| PB@PUS-2 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 9.5 | 27 | 8100 | 26.8 | 48.9 | 58.1 |
C 0 = influent concentration (mg L−1), v = flow rate (mL min−1), H = bed height (cm), tb = breakthrough time (h), ts = saturation time (h), Veff = effluent volume (mL), qb = adsorption at breakthrough (mg g−1), qs = adsorption at saturation (mg g−1), Rtotal = total cesium removal at saturation (%).
Parameters of the Thomas and Yoon–Nelson models under different conditions
| Adsorbent |
|
|
| Thomas model | Yoon–Nelson model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| PB@PUS-1 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 0.496 | 33.7 | 0.298 | 18.7 | 0.997 |
| PB@PUS-2 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 0.451 | 52.0 | 0.271 | 28.9 | 0.996 |
| PB@PUS-3 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 0.514 | 68.2 | 0.308 | 37.9 | 0.998 |
| PB@PUS-2 | 20 | 3 | 10 | 0.391 | 51.7 | 0.469 | 14.4 | 0.998 |
| PB@PUS-2 | 30 | 3 | 10 | 0.341 | 52.2 | 0.613 | 9.66 | 0.998 |
| PB@PUS-2 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 0.550 | 51.5 | 0.331 | 21.4 | 0.999 |
| PB@PUS-2 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 0.757 | 52.4 | 0.454 | 17.5 | 0.998 |
Comparison of adsorption capacities for Cs+ onto various adsorbents
| Adsorbents |
| References |
|---|---|---|
| PB/Fe3O4/GO | 55.56 |
|
| PB/magnetic nanoclusters | 45.87 |
|
| CsTreat (K2CoFe(CN)6) | 32.36 |
|
| PB/cellulose nanofibers | 139 |
|
| KCuHCF/Fe3O4/PVA hydrogel | 82.8 |
|
| PB/RGO foam | 18.67 |
|
| PB/magnetic hydrogel beads | 41.15 |
|
| PB@PUS-3 foam | 68.6 | This study |