| Literature DB >> 35558571 |
Tagang Ebogo Titus Ngwa1, Landry Oriole Mbouche2,3, Kamkui Laure Dadje2,3, Tambo Faustin Mouafo2,3, Fru Forbuzshi Angwafor2.
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of hypospadias is 1 in 300 male births, of whom one in four will have some form of chordee. Correction of the chordee is imperative but presents a challenge with complications, including residual chordee, penile nodulations, and shortening. This study aimed at reporting the outcomes and at sharing our experience with the surgical correction of chordee associated with hypospadias at the Yaounde Gyneco-Obstetric and Pediatric Hospital (YGOPH). Patients andEntities:
Keywords: Chordee; Nesbit; Yachia; corporoplasty; hypospadias; outcome; tunica albuginea plication
Year: 2022 PMID: 35558571 PMCID: PMC9089803 DOI: 10.4103/jwas.jwas_64_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J West Afr Coll Surg ISSN: 2276-6944
Figure 1Elevation and dissection of the neurovascular bundle. [From Mingin G, Baskin LS. Management of chordee in children and young adults. Urologic Clinics of North America 2002;29(2):277-84.]
Figure 2Nesbit excision corporoplasty [From Mingin G, Baskin LS. Management of chordee in children and young adults. Urologic Clinics of North America 2002;29(2):277-84.]
Figure 3(A) Demonstration of chordee before corporoplasty. (B) Artificial erection test after corporoplasty (YGOPH Paediatric Surgery Service Collection)
Figure 4(A and B): Tunica albuginea plication [From Mingin G, Baskin LS. Management of chordee in children and young adults. Urologic Clinics of North America 2002;29(2):277-84.]
Figure 5Yachia incision corporoplasty [From Mingin G, Baskin LS. Management of chordee in children and young adults. Urologic Clinics of North America 2002;29(2):277-84.]
Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics
| Variable | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Median age (years) | 6 |
| IQR (years) | 5–7 |
| Age extremes | 3–11 |
| Median follow-up period (years) | 5 |
| IQR (years) | 3–6 |
| Type of proximal hypospadias (%) | |
| Perineal | 42.3 |
| Scrotal | 2.5 |
| Penoscrotal | 37.5 |
| Posterior penile | 17.5 |
| Type of chordee (%) | |
| Severe | 35 (87.5) |
| Moderate | 5 (12.5) |
| Associated abnormalities (%) | |
| Cryptorchidism | 11(27.5) |
| Bifid scrotum | 6 (12%) |
| Previous surgery (%) | |
| Circumcision alone | 3 (7.5) |
| Failed previous hypospadias repair | 13 (32.5) |
| Technique of hypospadias repair (%) | |
| Bracka technique | 16 |
| Koyanagi-Hayashi | 20 |
| One-stage onlay flap technique | 4 |
| Corporoplasty technique (%) | |
| Nesbit | 22 |
| TAP | 13 |
| Yachia | 5 |
Association between the type of corporoplasty and penile shortening
| Variable | Nesbit ( | TAP ( | Yachia ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No shortening | 18 (81.8) | 13 (100%) | 5 (100%) | 0.620¥ |
| Shortening | 4 (18.2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
¥ Kruskal–Wallis test (α= 0.05)
Association between the type of corporoplasty and residual chordee
| Erection component of HOSE Score | Nesbit ( | TAP ( | Yachia ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Straight penis (4) | 17 (77.3%) | 08 (61.5%) | 1(20%) | 0.550± |
| Mild angulation < 10 (3) | 04 (18.2%) | 05 (38.5%) | 1(20%) | |
| Moderate angulation >10 <45 (2) | 01 (04.5%) | 00 (0%) | 3(60%) | |
| Severe angulation >45 (1) | 00 | 00 |
± Kruskal–Wallis test (α= 0.05)
Association between preoperatory degree of chordee and residual chordee
| Type of preoperatory chordee | Residual chordee (%) |
|---|---|
| Mild | 0 |
| Moderate | 5 (12.5%) |
| Severe | 9 (22.5%) |