Literature DB >> 35558511

A Cross-Sectional Study of Breast Cancer Surgery and the Cost Based on Data From 77 Chinese 3A Hospitals in 2015.

Rong Zhao1, Meng Jin2, Jinnan Gao1, Linhui Zhang1, Liyuan Tao2,3, Xiaoyuan Bao4.   

Abstract

Purposes: We aimed to clarify the real-world status of breast cancer surgery and the cost in China.
Methods: This cross-sectional survey relied on data obtained from the hospitalization summary reports (HSRs) in 77 top-ranked (grade 3A) hospitals in China to analyze breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between January 2015 and December 2015. The surgery and cost were mainly evaluated.
Results: Overall, 31,900 breast cancer patients underwent surgeries in 77 hospitals. The mean age in our study was 51.5 years (SD, 11.7 years). The primary types of surgical procedures were mastectomy (n = 24,629, 77.2%) and breast-conserving surgery (6,210, 19.5%). The rate of mastectomy was the highest at age band 50-65 years (n = 10,861, 82.1%) and in non-first-tier cities (n = 7,651, 88.4%) as well as in Northeast China (n = 3,107, 93.2%). The rate of breast-conserving surgery was less than 10% in non-first-tier cities (9.8%), Southwest China (6.1%), and Northeast China (5.8%). The median cost was $3,352.4 (interquartile range (IQR), $2,492.6-4,588.0). Mastectomy cost was significantly higher than breast-conserving surgery cost in both different city tiers and regional distribution except Northeast China (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the main breast cancer surgery in Chinese 3A hospitals was mastectomy and that the cost varied both across and within geographic regions and city tiers. This information helps describe the real-world status of breast surgery and the cost in China.
Copyright © 2022 Zhao, Jin, Gao, Zhang, Tao and Bao.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; breast neoplasms; cost of illness; cross-sectional studies; real-world study; surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 35558511      PMCID: PMC9086896          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.857359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   5.738


Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common female cancer all over the world (1). Although the incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer in China are relatively low, they are both on the rise. Due to the large population base, the incidence and death of breast cancer in China rank the first in the world (2, 3). Compared with other countries, for example, the United States, in which the median diagnosed age of breast cancer is more than 60 years (4), in China, breast cancer occurs at a younger age in women, with the median age at diagnosis of 48–50 years (5–7). Breast cancer in China is with more frequent advanced-stage presentation (6), and there are regional variations in incidence (8). The average total treatment cost for each new case in China is the lowest in the world, but as the largest low-income or middle-income country, breast cancer carries a heavy burden on Chinese patients (9). Another characteristic of Chinese women is their smaller breast size (10). All of these would affect Chinese patients’ and surgeons’ choice of treatment. Surgery is one of the main methods in the treatment of breast cancer and influences patients’ quality of life. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a standard treatment of early-stage breast carcinoma (11), while findings from a Chinese nationwide survey from 1999 to 2008 showed that mastectomy continues to be the main operation, accounting for 88.8% for primary breast cancer. By contrast, the incidence of mastectomy was 36% in the United States (12). In addition to mastectomy and BCS, oncoplastic surgery could be an option (13, 14), which has developed at a rapid pace and is being performed all over the world (15). However, the oncoplastic rate in China remains low, and most hospitals do not possess this type of surgery. Most of the aforementioned data were published before 2010 and are therefore relatively old, so it is necessary to review the status quo of surgical treatment of breast cancer in China. Using data from a survey in 2015, we aimed to clarify the current real-world breast surgery in a Chinese population and to provide a reference for the formulation of strategies.

Methods

Data Source

Data were obtained from the hospitalization summary reports (HSRs) in 77 top-ranked (grade 3A) hospitals in China from January 2015 to December 2015. Hospitals in China are classified into three grades. Grade 3A hospitals are with the highest rank. The HSRs are electronically submitted to the Beijing Municipal Health Bureau, containing information on hospitals, demographics, dates of admission and discharge, diagnoses (pre- and post-hospitalization), treatments, and hospitalization costs. Post-hospitalization diagnoses were coded by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes, and surgical operations were coded by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. This article was considered exempt from ethics review because it used data collected for administrative purposes without any personal identifiers. Patients who underwent surgery for primary breast malignancy were identified.

Study Population

In the present study, patients with breast cancer were identified from the database using the ICD-10 codes C50 (the first listed diagnosis). Then 85.2000x001, 85.2000x002, 85.3600x001, 85.8100, 85.9x200x001, and 85.9200 items were deleted, as those codes represent surgical management of surgical complications. For example, 85.2000x001 represents “Breast skin and subcutaneous necrotic tissue excision and debridement.” Patients who had undergone surgery were identified using the ICD-9-CM codes 85.2–85.9. To avoid the omission, all surgery and disposal items were contacted, and the Chinese terms of “surgery” were applied to identify additional eligible patients. The main surgery was identified in a logical way. For example, if a patient’s surgery codes included “mastectomy” and “BCS,” the main code should be “mastectomy” rather than “BCS,” as she should not be qualified for BCS and should undergo mastectomy immediately.

Statistical Analysis

All data were analyzed through Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) V.26. Ages were categorized into four groups: <35, 35–49, 50–65, and >65. Hospitals were categorized into 7 regions (North China, South China, Southwest China, Northeast China, East China, Central China, and Northwest China) according to geographical distribution and 2 city tiers (first tier and non-first tier, according to official list). Categorical variables are reported as a proportion (%), and numerical data are reported as mean ± SD or median and corresponding 25th and 75th percentiles (interquartile range (IQR)). ANOVA, independent t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, and chi-squared (χ2) test were performed as appropriate for statistical analysis. All p-values were considered statistically significant at two-tailed p < 0.05.

Results

Characteristics of Patients

A total of 31,900 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery were identified from the database. Demographics and pathologic characteristics, surgery, cost, city level, and regions are summarized in .
Table 1

Characteristics of patients.

N%
Age (years)
Mean (SD)51.5 (11.7)
 <351,9626.2
 35–4912,92840.5
 50–6513,22141.4
 >653,78911.9
Surgical method
 Mastectomy24,62977.2
 BCS6,21019.5
 Reconstruction7873.7
  Autogenous reconstruction1380.8
   Pedicled flaps1230.4
    LADO1040.3
    TRAM190.1
   Free flaps15
  Implant5611.8
  Other reconstruction880.3
 Palliative surgery160.1
 Others2580.8
Male breast cancer260.1
City tiers
 First-tier cities23,24172.9
 Non-first-tier cities8,65927.1
Regions
 North China7,22522.6
 South China2,4397.6
 Southwest China1,7865.6
 Northeast China3,33410.5
 East China11,02234.6
 Central China4,09512.8
 Northwest China1,9996.3
Pathological type7,668100
 Invasive carcinomas7,38196.3
  Invasive ductal carcinomas5,69474.3
  Invasive lobular carcinoma2162.8
  Mucinous carcinoma1001.3
  Other types1,37117.9
 Carcinoma in situ 2683.5
  DCIS1742.3
  Paget disease941.2
 Other types190.2
The total cost ($)
 Median (IQR)3,352.4 (2,492.6–4,588.0)
Traditional Chinese medicine($)
 The number of users8,18425.7
 Median (IQR)90.9 (26.6–199.0)

BCS breast-conserving surgery; LADO, lattisimus dorsi flap; TRAM, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; IQR, interquartile range.

Characteristics of patients. BCS breast-conserving surgery; LADO, lattisimus dorsi flap; TRAM, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; IQR, interquartile range. The mean age in our study was 51.5 years (SD, 11.7 years). Most patients were in the 35–65 age range (81.9%), and 46.7% of the patients were diagnosed before 50 years of age. The primary types of surgical procedure were mastectomy and BCS. Nearly four-fifths of the patients (n = 24,629, 77.2%) underwent mastectomy, and less than one-fifth (n = 6,210, 19.5%) underwent BCS. The rate of reconstruction was low (n = 787, 3.7%), and the main reconstruction surgery was implant (n = 561, 1.8%). In our study, 26 patients (0.1%) was male. Of the patients, 72.9% (n = 23,241) were from first-tier cities (first-tier cities cover 19 cities), and more than half of the patients came from East (n = 11,022, 34.6%) or North China (n = 7,225, 22.6%). There were less patients from Southwest (n = 1,786, 5.6%), Northwest (n = 1,999, 6.3%), and South China (n = 2,439, 7.6%). Only 7,668 patients had available pathological information. Invasive cancer accounted for 96.3% (n = 7,381), and carcinoma in situ accounted for 3.5% (n = 268). The median cost was $3,352.4 (IQR, $2,492.6–4,588.0). More than a quarter of the patients (n = 8,184, 25.7%) used traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) during the hospital stay, and the median cost was $90.9 (IQR, $26.6–199.0).

Age Distribution of City Tiers and Regions

Patients in first-tier cities tended to be younger than in non-first-tier cities (mean (SD), 50.9 years (11.2 years) vs. 51.8 years (11.8 years), p < 0.001). Patients younger than 50 years were 45.7% in first-tier cities and 49.1% in non-first-cities. Age distributions were different among regions (p < 0.001). The oldest populations were located in North China [mean (SD), 53.1 years (12.1 years)] ( ).
Table 2

Age (years) distribution of city tiers and regions.

Mean (SD)<3535–4950–65>65p
City tiers<0.001
 First-tier cities51.8 (11.8)1,472 (6.3)9,167 (39.4)9,678 (41.6)2,924 (12.6)
 Non-first-tier cities50.9 (11.2)490 (5.7)3,761 (43.4)3,543 (40.9)865 (10.0)
Regions<0.001
 North China53.1 (12.1)400 (5.5)2,565 (35.5)3,159 (43.7)1,101 (15.2)
 South China49.3 (11.4)219 (9.0)1,109 (45.5)901 (36.9)210 (8.6)
 Southwest China50.2 (10.9)88 (4.9)888 (49.7)647 (36.2)163 (9.1)
 Northeast China51.7 (11.0)164 (4.9)1,309 (39.3)1,504 (45.1)357 (10.7)
 East China52.1 (12.0)692 (6.3)4,225 (38.3)4,672 (42.4)1,433 (13.0)
 Central China49.3 (10.5)273 (6.7)2,003 (48.9)1,540 (37.6)279 (6.8)
 Northwest China51.4 (11.8)126 (6.3)829 (41.5)798 (39.9)246 (12.3)
Age (years) distribution of city tiers and regions.

Breast Surgery and the Cost

There were significant age, city tiers, regions, and cost differences across surgical groups (p < 0.001). The mean age of the patients who underwent reconstruction was younger than 50 years (lattisimus dorsi flap, 43.5 years (SD, 9.4 years); transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, 45.6 years (SD, 9.1 years); free flaps, 46.7 years (SD, 12.0 years); implant, 40.1 years (SD, 8.8 years); other reconstruction, 45.4 years (SD, 9.6 years)). The rate of mastectomy was the highest at age band 50–65 (n = 10,861, 82.1%), and the rate of BCS was the highest at age band <35 (n = 551, 28.1%). The rate of BCS was 23.1% in first-tier cities; however, it was less than 10% (9.8%) in non-first-tier cities. In terms of geographic division, the highest rate of mastectomy was in Northeast China (93.2%, n = 3,107), ranking no. 1, and the lowest rate of mastectomy was in South China (69.4%, n = 1,692) and North China (69.6%, n = 5,026). Reconstruction rates were low in all regions. Reconstruction expended more, and the first was free flap (median, $7,185.5; IQR, $4,083.3–8,601.3) ( ).
Table 3

Breast surgery distribution of age, city tiers, regions, and the total cost.

MastectomyBCSReconstructionPalliative surgeryOthersp
Autogenous reconstructionImplantOther reconstruction
Pedicled flapsFree flaps
LADOTRAM
Age (years)<0.001
Mean (SD)52.2 (11.3)50.2 (12.7)43.5 (9.4)45.6 (9.1)46.7 (12.0)40.1 (8.8)45.4 (9.6)57.8 (14.4)50.1 (11.1)
 <351,191 (60.7)551 (28.1)17331669022<0.001
 35–499,587 (74.2)2,782 (21.5)61105320545104
 50–6510,861 (82.1)2,112 (16.0)256671228110
 >652,990 (78.9)765 (20.2)10143322
City tiers<0.001
 First-tier cities16,978 (73.1)5,363 (23.1)7917134925915225
 Non-first-tier cities7,651 (88.4)847 (9.8)25226929133
Regions<0.001
 North China5,026 (69.6)1,969 (27.3)171412211075
 South China1,692 (69.4)668 (27.4)76154308
 Southwest China1,596 (89.4)109 (6.1)700531902
 Northeast China3,107 (93.2)195 (5.8)11019605
 East China8,306 (75.4)2,187 (19.8)621192614315128
 Central China3,181 (77.7)848 (20.7)101341128
 Northwest China1,721 (86.1)234 (11.7)900185012
The total cost ($)<0.001
 Median (IQR)3,454.6 (2,601.9–4,682.5)2,775.4 (1,953.2–3,995.1)4,064.3 (3,389.2–5,299.3)4,377.4 (3,785.4–6,943.3)7,185.5 (4,083.3–8,601.3)4,411.5 (3,091.8–6,632.6)4,199.6 (3,366.8–5,113.5)1,992.7 (1,185.7–2,431.5)2,139.0 (1,428.7–3,621.1)

BCS, breast-conserving surgery; LADO, lattisimus dorsi flaps; TRAM, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps.

Breast surgery distribution of age, city tiers, regions, and the total cost. BCS, breast-conserving surgery; LADO, lattisimus dorsi flaps; TRAM, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. In addition, mastectomy cost was significantly higher than BCS cost in both different city tiers and regional distribution (p < 0.001) except in Northeast China (p = 0.881) ( and ).
Figure 1

The median cost of mastectomy and BCS of different city tiers (A) and regions (B). BCS, breast-conserving surgery.

The median cost of mastectomy and BCS of different city tiers (A) and regions (B). BCS, breast-conserving surgery.

Discussion

Although our study only included part of Chinese breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from grade 3A hospitals, accounting for about one-tenth of the total incidence in 2015 (16), it is still the largest study to reflect the latest surgery status of breast cancer in China. The age characteristics of the newly diagnosed cases in our study are consistent with previous reports (5–7). Younger age and higher density are a great challenge for the Chinese government in developing screening strategies, as the benefit of mammography remains controversial in women younger than 50 years (17), and half of the Chinese patients are within this range. However, the best recommendations of the age range for mammography screening are based on European and US trials, and China lacks large analogous trials. It is necessary to carry out corresponding research to better guide our clinical practice. Compared with the United States (less than 40%) (12, 18), in China, mastectomy accounts for 77.2% of surgery for primary breast cancer in our study. South China and North China showed a low rate of mastectomy across the country. It may be due to these two regions containing hospitals from Beijing and Shanghai, which represent higher Chinese medical levels. It is consistent with the rate in first-tier cities. Notably, the rate in South China and North China was high at 70%, but our study only contains large 3A hospitals, so the real results might be worse. There are five possible reasons. The first reason may be the high percentage of advanced stage at presentation. A previous study (6) revealed that Chinese patients were diagnosed 60.6% at stage I/II and 21.1% at stage III/IV disease, but disease presentations at stage III/IV (visit to oncologist firstly) might be substantially underestimated because most data on the stage at diagnosis are mainly collected from surgical departments. A business survey found that nearly two-thirds of Chinese breast cancer patients were diagnosed with advanced disease (9). The second influence factor is small breast size. BCS is not suitable when the tumor–breast size ratio exceeds a certain value, which is common in China (6, 19). The third reason is that the development of breast reconstruction in China is less than ideal. Breast reconstruction can help patients achieve disease control and aesthetic appearance. However, the reconstruction rate in China is low, and only several hospitals meet the surgical qualification. A 2019 Chinese study (20) showed that the rate of implant-based breast reconstruction in all the patients who received mastectomy was only 7.06% (4,296/60,877). The fourth reason is Chinese patients’ misunderstanding of breast surgery. Most of the patients have doubts about “less is more” and tend to regard breast conservation as disease residual. At the same time, they consider reconstruction as major surgery, which means complications, and they fear surgical complications (21). Patient education may help change this situation. The average total treatment cost of a new case of breast cancer in China ranks low as compared with other countries (9). However, breast cancer is one of the leading causes of catastrophic medical expenditure in China and can rapidly impoverish families (9, 22). The cost of radiotherapy after breast conservation is a heavy burden (23). This may be the fifth reason for the low rate of breast conservation. However, the psychological effects of mastectomy could be higher than the cost of radiotherapy, and this problem could be managed with insurance facilities. Additionally, there is a wide range of variation both across and within geographic regions in the treatment and nursing cost, and it is hard to discern whether higher fees mean better service or survival. With the advancement of the diagnosis-related group (DRG) system in China (24), the gap in breast cancer treatment costs between and within regions would be greatly decreased. Also, based on our data, the median cost of BCS ($2,775.4) is lower than that of mastectomy ($3,454.6). In other words, BCS means more profit for surgeons. Maybe the implementation of the DRG system would encourage surgeons to promote breast-conserving surgery. About 25% of breast cancer patients in our study have used TCM. The widespread use of traditional medicine is related to beliefs that it can alleviate toxic effects, promote recovery, and improve immune function and quality of life (25). It is different from modern medicine, based on the holistic approach and the Chinese materia medica to diagnose and treat the disease. TCM is an empirical science based on over 2,000 years of accumulated knowledge and practice (26). TCM is usually regarded as a complementary or “alternative” treatment of modern Western medicine in other countries (27). It is regarded the same in most hospitals in China except TCM hospitals. The limitation of TCM applications is mainly due to its lack of evidence-based features (28). The integration of scientific principles and techniques with traditional medicine will serve modern medicine well (29). Our study has important limitations. Firstly, some patients received both surgery and chemotherapy during the same hospital stay, leading to the cost being not comparable to some extent. On the other hand, the cost in our study is the total cost, including medical insurance reimbursement, rather than patients’ own expense. So the cost in our study cannot reflect the personal medical expenditure. Secondly, our study lacks breast cancer stage; some of our inferences (for example, “this may be due to advanced stage”) are based on other studies rather than our data. More importantly, although we figured out that the data of breast cancer stage at present may be imprecise in China, we are unable to provide relevant data. Thirdly, the hospitals in our study are all at the 3A level, representing a high medical level in China. The data we present could not reflect the reality of breast cancer surgery and the cost. Fourthly, HSR data are still subject to some incomplete or inaccurately recorded information, for example, wrong ICD coding order in the medical records room. However, we checked the logical order, and errors in the data may have been reduced. Finally, the data we provided were a bit outdated (2015); however, they were the most current and large-scale datasets to date.

Conclusion

Our study found that the main breast cancer operation in China in 2015 is mastectomy and that there is a wide cost range of variation both across and within geographic regions and city tiers. There are gaps in breast cancer surgery treatment in comparison to other countries. The Chinese government needs to take measures to improve the quality of treatment for breast cancer patients in China.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: JG, LT, RZ, and LZ. Project administration: LT. Methodology: LT and XB. Data curation: RZ and MJ. Formal analysis: LT. Manuscript preparation: JG and RZ. Final approval of manuscript: all authors.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number: 82004210] and the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1704400).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  22 in total

1.  [Current practice of implant-based breast reconstruction: results from China national practice questionnaire survey].

Authors:  R Guo; B Q Xiu; Y H Su; J Wang; Q Zhang; W R Chi; L Li; B L Yang; Y Y Zhang; A Y Cao; Z M Shao; J Wu
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-08-01

Review 2.  Interactions between traditional Chinese medicines and Western therapeutics.

Authors:  Elena Chan; Marisela Tan; Jianni Xin; Sucha Sudarsanam; Dale E Johnson
Journal:  Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel       Date:  2010-01

3.  [Report of cancer epidemiology in China, 2015].

Authors:  R S Zheng; K X Sun; S W Zhang; H M Zeng; X N Zou; R Chen; X Y Gu; W W Wei; J He
Journal:  Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi       Date:  2019-01-23

Review 4.  Breast Reconstruction: A Century of Controversies and Progress.

Authors:  Antoine Homsy; Eva Rüegg; Denys Montandon; Georges Vlastos; Ali Modarressi; Brigitte Pittet
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 5.  What has traditional Chinese medicine delivered for modern medicine?

Authors:  Jigang Wang; Yin-Kwan Wong; Fulong Liao
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 5.600

Review 6.  Oncoplastic Surgery in the Management of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Simona F Shaitelman; Jacqueline S Jeruss; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  The Role of Oncoplastic Surgery for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Isis Scomacao; Zahraa AlHilli; Graham Schwarz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-10-06

8.  Breast cancer in a transitional society over 18 years: trends and present status in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Lei Fan; Ying Zheng; Ke-Da Yu; Guang-Yu Liu; Jiong Wu; Jin-Song Lu; Kun-Wei Shen; Zhen-Zhou Shen; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Surgical trends in breast cancer: a rise in novel operative treatment options over a 12 year analysis.

Authors:  Michael M Jonczyk; Jolie Jean; Roger Graham; Abhishek Chatterjee
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Determinants of breast size in Asian women.

Authors:  Li Yan Lim; Peh Joo Ho; Jenny Liu; Wen Yee Chay; Min-Han Tan; Mikael Hartman; Jingmei Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.