| Literature DB >> 35558439 |
Georgina L Gregory1, Charlotte K Williams1.
Abstract
Thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) that are closed-loop recyclable are needed in a circular material economy, but many current materials degrade during recycling, and almost all are pervasive hydrocarbons. Here, well-controlled block polyester TPEs featuring regularly placed sodium/lithium carboxylate side chains are described. They show significantly higher tensile strengths than unfunctionalized analogues, with high elasticity and elastic recovery. The materials are prepared using controlled polymerizations, exploiting a single catalyst that switches between different polymerization cycles. ABA block polyesters of high molar mass (60-100 kg mol-1; 21 wt % A-block) are constructed using the ring-opening polymerization of ε-decalactone (derived from castor oil; B-block), followed by the alternating ring-opening copolymerization of phthalic anhydride with 4-vinyl-cyclohexene oxide (A-blocks). The polyesters undergo efficient functionalization to install regularly placed carboxylic acids onto the A blocks. Reacting the polymers with sodium or lithium hydroxide controls the extent of ionization (0-100%); ionized polymers show a higher tensile strength (20 MPa), elasticity (>2000%), and elastic recovery (>80%). In one case, sodium functionalization results in 35× higher stress at break than the carboxylic acid polymer; in all cases, changing the quantity of sodium tunes the properties. A leading sample, 2-COONa75 (M n 100 kg mol-1, 75% sodium), shows a wide operating temperature range (-52 to 129 °C) and is recycled (×3) by hot-pressing at 200 °C, without the loss of mechanical properties. Both the efficient synthesis of ABA block polymers and precision ionization in perfectly alternating monomer sequences are concepts that can be generalized to many other monomers, functional groups, and metals. These materials are partly bioderived and have degradable ester backbone chemistries, deliver useful properties, and allow for thermal reprocessing; these features are attractive as future sustainable TPEs.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35558439 PMCID: PMC9084597 DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.2c00068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Macromolecules ISSN: 0024-9297 Impact factor: 6.057
Figure 1Synthesis of polyester ionomers. (i) DL ROP at 80 °C catalyzed by LZnMg(C6F5)2 (see the Supporting Information for the structure) with a 1,4-benzenedimethanol (BDM) bifunctional initiator, where [Cat]0/[BDM]0/[DL]0 = 1:4:2000 (2-vinyl) and [DL]0 = 2.0 M in toluene (see Table S1 for monomer conversions and reaction times). (ii) Addition of PA (400 equiv) and excess vCHO (1200 equiv). ROCOP conducted at 100 °C for 24 h. For PE(v)–PDL–PE(v) (referred to as 1-vinyl), Mn,total by SEC = 60 kg mol–1 (Đ 1.04) with 21 wt % PE(v) by NMR spectroscopy. For 2-vinyl, Mn,total by SEC = 100 kg mol–1 (Đ 1.05), 20 wt % PE(v). (iii) UV-mediated thiol–ene reaction (0.5 h) with 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) and dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone photoinitiator. PE(COOH)–PDL–PE(COOH) (referred to as 1-or 2-COOH) corresponds to 25/26 wt % PE(COOH). (iv) Full or partial neutralization of the carboxylic acid with LiOH or NaOH.
Figure 2Characterization of block polyester ionomers. (A) FTIR spectra of polymer films comparing the unmodified (1-vinyl), carboxylic acid-functionalized (1-COOH), and fully lithium/sodium neutralized carboxylates (1-COOLi and 1-COONa). (B) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms (measured between −80 and 200 °C at 10 °C min–1). (C) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves (10 °C min–1 heating rate). (D) Room-temperature small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) profiles with labeled principal scattering peaks (*) and higher-order peaks (q/q*) (Table S3).
Summary of the Key TPE Dataa
| sample | σb (MPa) | εb (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.52 ± 0.03 | 2214 ± 20 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 10.3 ± 0.6 | –50, n.o | 304 | |
| 17 ± 0.2 | 1919 ± 47 | 8.1 ± 1.5 | 166 ± 2 | –51, 76 | 315 | |
| 1.02 ± 0.01 | 2785 ± 56 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | ∼2.1 | –50, 140 | 328 | |
| 5.8 ± 0.3 | 2747 ± 42 | 1.52 ± 0.02 | 97 ± 3 | –50, 113 [−44, 120*] | 323 | |
| 19.5 ± 0.2 | 2420 ± 28 | 8.8 ± 1.0 | 283 ± 8 | –55, 101 [−52, 127*] | 320 | |
| PE–PDL–PE (90,
23)[ | 6.5 ± 0.2 | 1097 ± 37 | 5.0 ± 0.7 | 40 ± 3 | –51, 136* | 307 |
| PLLA–PDL–PLLA (191,
25)[ | 13.6 ± 0.5 | 1212 ± 25 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 82 ± 5 | –49, 60 ( | 225 |
| PLLA/PDLA–PM–PLLA/PDLA[ | 21.8 ± 0.8 | 990 ± 62 | 29.2 ± 2.9 | ∼108 | –21,
( | |
| PLLA–PyMCL–PLLA (73, 28)[ | 35 ± 3 | 895 ± 20 | 13 ± 10 | ∼157 | –59, 52 ( | |
| PLLA–PCVL–PLLA[ | 46.3 ± 1.4 | 2100 ± 65 | 2.4 | 445 ± 12 | ( |
Tensile mechanical data of polymer films. Ey = Young’s modulus; εb = elongation at break; σb = tensile strength; UT = tensile toughness (area under the stress–strain curve). ± is the standard deviation from at least three measurements.
1- and 2- refer to triblock polymers with Mn,SEC 60 or 100 kg mol–1, respectively; carboxylic acid-functionalized (1/2-COOH) or 75% neutralized with Na (1/2-COONa75). PE = poly(cyclohexene oxide-alt-phthalate) (i.e., PA/CHO ROCOP); 90 or 105, the overall triblock Mn,SEC (kg mol–1), 18–23 wt % PE. PLLA = poly(l-lactide). PM = poly(menthide). PγMCL = poly(γ-methyl-ε caprolactone). PCVL = poly(ε-caprolactone-co-δ-valerolactone).
Glass transition from DSC (10 °C min–1 heating rate, second heating curve). * Tg measured by DMTA from the peak in tan δ.
Thermal degradation behavior measured by TGA; the temperature at which 5% mass is lost.
Figure 3Tensile testing of polyester TPE ionomers. (A) Stress–strain curves (representative of three repeats) comparing 1-COOH with 100% Na- or Li-neutralized derivatives. (B) Elongation at break (εb), stress at break (σb), Young’s modulus (Ey), and tensile toughness (UT, calculated as the area under the stress–strain curve) as a function of the neutralization extent of 1-COOH (0–100%). (C) Stress–strain curves for higher Mn triblock polyesters (2-vinyl = 100 kg mol–1; 1-vinyl = 60 kg mol–1), comparing unmodified (2-vinyl), carboxylic acid-functionalized (2-COOH) and 75% Na-neutralized (2-COONa75). (D) Ashby plot (Table S5 for details): sodium ionomers of styrenic block copolymers (SBS, SEBS), random Na-/Zn-ethylene/methacrylic acid (EMAA) ionomers, and ionic rubbers.
Figure 4Elastic behavior. (A) Stretching–relaxing cycles of 2-COONa75 to 200% strain. (B) Corresponding elastic recovery and resilience for each cycle. (C) Stress softening with cycle number; σ0 = maximum stress in the first cycle and σ = maximum stress in the subsequent cycle i. In 1-COONax, x = 25, 50, 75, and 100% neutralized. (D) Stress relaxation experiments at 200% applied strain; stress is normalized to the stress at time, t = 0 (σ0).
Figure 5Thermal reprocessing of 2-COONa75 and degradation studies. (A) Temperature dependence of tan δ (storage/loss modulus) for 2-COOH and 2-COONa75 measured by DMTA. (B) Temperature dependence of the storage modulus (MPa) for 2-COOH and 2-COONa75 measured by DMTA. (C) Stress–strain curves of 2-COONa75 after repeated (×3) compression molding. (D) Degradation study in aqueous alkaline media (1 M NaOH, RT).