Literature DB >> 35558186

Complete mitochondrial genome of Asiagomphus coreanus (Odonata: Gomphidae), which is endemic to South Korea.

Jeong Sun Park1, Min Jee Kim1,2, Sung Soo Kim3, Iksoo Kim1.   

Abstract

Asiagomphus coreanus (Doi & Okumura, 1937) belongs to the family Gomphidae in the order Odonata, and has been listed as an endemic species in South Korea. Here, we assembled its complete mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) which is 15,649 base pairs (bp) in length. The A. coreanus mitogeneome consists of a typical set of genes [13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 2 ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes, and 22 transfer RNA (tRNA) genes] and one major non-coding A + T-rich region which is 846 bp long. The gene arrangement of the species was identical to that of commonly found in the majority of the insects. Phylogenetic analyses using the concatenated sequences of 13 PCGs and two rRNA genes of the representative odonate mitogenomes by Bayesian inference method revealed that A. coreanus belongs to the Gomphidae family with a strong nodal support (Bayesian posterior probabilities = 1). Unlike previous phylogenetic analyses (with regards to suborder relationships) the suborder Anisozygoptera-which was represented by a single species, Epiophlebia superstes-was placed as the sister to Zygoptera.
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asiagomphus coreanu; Gomphidae; Mitochondrial genome

Year:  2022        PMID: 35558186      PMCID: PMC9090352          DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2072246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour        ISSN: 2380-2359            Impact factor:   0.610


The dragonfly, Asiagomphus coreanus Doi & Okumura, 1937 is classified under the Gomphidae family in the order Odonata, and is an endemic species rarely found in South Korea (Lee 2013). A. coreanus can be easily recognized based on a broad yellow stripe on abdominal segment VII (Bae and Lee 2012). Larvae burrow under particular habitats in lowland river areas where the substrates are composed of mud and sand (Chung et al. 2016). Adults live the waterside and nearby forests, except during mating period (Chung et al. 2016). In this study, we analyzed the complete mitochondrial genome (mitogenome) of A. coreanus. An adult A. coreanus was captured at Dongmak-ri, Galmal-eup, Cheorwon-gun, Gangwon-do Province, South Korea (38°14′50″ N, 127°18′00″ E) on June 2019. All authors promise that we have no any unethical behaviors for the study. The collection of insect material was carried out in accordance with guidelines and regulations provided by the authors’ institutions, local, national, and international regulations. If we have any unethical and illegal behaviors, we will take all responsibilities. Two hind legs were used for DNA extraction. Leftover DNA and specimen were deposited at the Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea, under the accession number CNU11150 (Iksoo Kim, ikkim81@chonnam.ac.kr). To obtain the complete sequence of the mitogenome of A. coreanus, whole genome sequencing was performed using the MGISEQ-2000 sequencing platform (MGI Tech Co. Ltd, Shenzhen, China). Construction of the genome was conducted using MITObim ver. 1.9 (Hahn et al. 2013) by de novo assembly. In order to obtain the precise genome sequence, gap filling was performed using the conventional Sanger-based sequencing method. For phylogenetic analysis, nucleotide sequences of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) and two rRNA genes of 35 species of the order Odonata belonging to 12 families and three species of Ephemeroptera (outgroups) were downloaded from GenBank and aligned. The optimal relationship tree was prepared with a Bayesian inference (BI) method using MrBayes v. 3.2.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012), implemented in the CIPRES Portal ver. 3.1 (Miller et al. 2010). For this analysis, the GTR + Gamma + I model, which was determined using PartitionFinder 2 and the Greedy algorithm, was used (Lanfear et al. 2012, 2014, 2017). The A. coreanus mitogenome is 15,649 bp in length, with a typical set of genes (2 rRNAs, 22 tRNAs, and 13 PCGs) and a major non-coding A + T-rich region (GenBank accession number MN812523). The mitogenome of A. coreanus is well within the size range found in other insects belonging to the order Odonata. Thirteen PCGs had the typical ATN start codon, and nine of the 13 PCGs had a complete stop codon; however, COI, COII, COIII, and ND5 had incomplete (T-) stop codons. The gene arrangement was identical to that typically observed in majority of other insects (Cameron 2014). The A + T-rich region of A. coreanus was 846 bp. The A/T content of the whole mitogenome was 70.8%; however, it varied among the genes as follows: 86.4%, A + T-rich region; 74.3%, lrRNA; 71.2%, srRNA; 71.3%, tRNAs; and 69.4%, PCGs. Both the suborders Zygoptera and Anisoptera were shown to be monophyletic with the highest node support [Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) = 1.00; Figure 1]. All superfamilies and families represented by multiple taxa in Odonata were consistently revealed as being monophyletic with the highest nodal supports. The sister relationship between Zygoptera and Anisozygoptera (BPP = 0.99) was unconventional (Rehn 2003; Davis et al. 2011; Kim et al. 2014), but recent mitogenome-based phylogenetic results consistently supported the sister relationship between these two suborders (Yong et al. 2016; Jeong et al. 2018; Kim et al. 2018). A. coreanus was placed as the sister to Davidius lunatus with the highest nodal support.
Figure 1.

Phylogenetic tree for Odonata. The tree was constructed using the concatenated nucleotide sequences of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) and 2 rRNAs using the Bayesian inference (BI) method. The numbers at each node specify the Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP). The scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site. GenBank accession numbers of each species are shown in the brackets after scientific names.

Phylogenetic tree for Odonata. The tree was constructed using the concatenated nucleotide sequences of 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) and 2 rRNAs using the Bayesian inference (BI) method. The numbers at each node specify the Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP). The scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site. GenBank accession numbers of each species are shown in the brackets after scientific names.
  8 in total

1.  Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  Robert Lanfear; Brett Calcott; Simon Y W Ho; Stephane Guindon
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  Insect mitochondrial genomics: implications for evolution and phylogeny.

Authors:  Stephen L Cameron
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 19.686

3.  PartitionFinder 2: New Methods for Selecting Partitioned Models of Evolution for Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analyses.

Authors:  Robert Lanfear; Paul B Frandsen; April M Wright; Tereza Senfeld; Brett Calcott
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Fossil gaps inferred from phylogenies alter the apparent nature of diversification in dragonflies and their relatives.

Authors:  Robert B Davis; David B Nicholson; Emily L R Saunders; Peter J Mayhew
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Macromia daimoji Okumura, 1949 (Odonata: Macromiidae).

Authors:  Min Jee Kim; Su Yeon Jeong; Ah Rha Wang; Junghwa An; Iksoo Kim
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 0.658

7.  Reconstructing mitochondrial genomes directly from genomic next-generation sequencing reads--a baiting and iterative mapping approach.

Authors:  Christoph Hahn; Lutz Bachmann; Bastien Chevreux
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Selecting optimal partitioning schemes for phylogenomic datasets.

Authors:  Robert Lanfear; Brett Calcott; David Kainer; Christoph Mayer; Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.