| Literature DB >> 35557831 |
Yadavali Siva Prasad1, Balasubramani Saritha1, Ayyapillai Tamizhanban1, Krishnamoorthy Lalitha1, Sakthivel Kabilan1, C Uma Maheswari1, Vellaisamy Sridharan2, Subbiah Nagarajan1,3.
Abstract
In developing countries, wounds are a major health concern and pose a significant problem. Hence, the development of new materials that can act as scaffolds for in situ tissue regeneration and regrowth is necessary. In this report, we present a new class of injectable oleogel and composite gel derived from glycolipids that provide reversible interlinked 3D fiberous network architecture for effective wound closure by tissue regrowth and regeneration. Glycolipids were derived from α-chloralose and various vinyl esters using Novozyme 435, an immobilized lipase B from Candida antarctica as a catalyst, in good yield. These glycolipids undergo spontaneous self-assembly in paraffin oil to form an oleogel, in which curcumin was successfully incorporated to generate a composite gel. Morphological analysis of the oleogel and composite gel clearly revealed the formation of a 3D fiberous network. Rheological investigation revealed the thermal and mechanical processability of the oleogel and composite gel under various experimental conditions. Interestingly, the developed injectable oleogel and composite gel are able to accelerate the wound healing process by regulating the overlapping phases of inflammation, cell proliferation and extracellular matrix remodelling. Since chloralose displays anesthetic properties, this study will establish a new strategy to develop anesthetic wound healing oleogels in the future. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35557831 PMCID: PMC9089313 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra07703g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Scheme 1Synthesis of anesthetic glycolipids 3a–e.
Fig. 1Optical microscopy images of (a and b) oleogel and (c and d) composite gel. HRTEM images of (e and f) oleogel and (g and h) composite gel.
Fig. 2(a & b) Strain amplitude and angular frequency dependence of G′ and G′′ of injectable oleogel and composite gel.
Fig. 3(a & b) Temperature dependence of G′ and G′′ of oleogel and composite gel. (c & d) Thixotropy-loop test via continuous step-strain measurements of oleogel and composite gel.
Effect of oleogels and composite gel on percentage (%) of wound healing in experimental ratsa
| Vehicles | Percentage of wound healing (mean + SEM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 6 | Day 12 | Day 18 | Day 21 | |
| Control (paraffin oil) | 12.29 ± 2.06 | 58.82 ± 2.95 | 76.37 ± 166 | 82.83 ± 1.4 |
| Oleogel 1 | 18.07 ± 2.55 | 74.31 ± 4.7* | 90.34 ± 1.24* | 93.50 ± 0.99* |
| Oleogel 2 | 30.77 ± 3.67** | 83.71 ± 1.21*** | 94.27 ± 0.75** | 96.00 ± 0.68** |
| Composite gel | 24.69 ± 2.51* | 80.98 ± 1.41*** | 92.81 ± 0.61** | 95.33 ± 0.61* |
Percentage value of mean ± SEM of each group. Significance was at P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), or P < 0.001(***). Comparison of treated groups with the control group. The results were analysed statistically using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons.
Fig. 4The gross appearance of wound healing on day 18 (a–d) and 21 (e–h). (a and e) Wounds treated with 0.1 mL of paraffin oil (control); (b and f) wounds treated with 0.1 mL of oleogel (1% w/v); (c and g) 0.1 mL oleogel (2% w/v)-treated rats showing almost complete wound closure, and (d and h) 0.1 mL composite gel (1% w/v)-treated showing complete wound closure. Progress of wound healing with exact scale bar is given in Fig. S7a–d.†
Biochemical profiles of the granulation tissue obtained from the skin-excised wounds of different experimental groupsa
| Hydroxy proline (mg/100 mg) | Hexosamine (mg/100 mg) | Lipid peroxide (mg/100 mg) | Vitamin C (mg/100 mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (paraffin oil) | 5.3 ± 0.2 | 0.39 ± 0.22 | 9.7 ± 1.3 | 5.9 ± 0.7 |
| Oleogel (1% w/v) | 6.8 ± 0.7 | 0.72 ± 0.23 | 6.8 ± 1.7 | 7.9 ± 0.6* |
| Oleogel (2% w/v) | 8.1 ± 1.8** | 1.19 ± 0.22*** | 4.2 ± 1.9 ** | 8.4 ± 1.0** |
| Composite gel (1% w/v) | 12.3 ± 2.9*** | 1.27 ± 0.05*** | 4.7 ± 2 ** | 7.5 ± 0.1** |
Values noted as mean ± SE of each group. P < 0.05 (*), P < 0.01 (**), P < 0.001(***). Comparison of treated groups with control group. Results were analysed statistically using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's test for multiple comparisons.
Fig. 5Haematoxylin and eosin (H & E) staining of sections of healed skin of experimental groups: (a and b) control group shows moderate epithelialization with early fibroblast phase; (c and d) skin section of oleogel 1 treated group shows granulation tissue with marked epithelialization and late fibroblast phase; (e and f) oleogel 2 treated group shows granulation tissue with complete epithelialization; and (g and h) composite gel group displays complete epithelialisation at 4× and 10× magnifications. Arrow – epidermis; D – dermis; S – scab; GT – granulation tissue.