The structural modification of N-aryl indazolols as tautomers of N-aryl indazolones has been established as a hot topic in pharmaceutics and medicinal chemistry. We herein disclose the rhodium(III)-catalyzed 1,4-addition reaction of maleimides with N-aryl indazol-3-ols, which provides the succinimide-bearing indazol-3-ol scaffolds with complete regioselectivity and a good functional group tolerance. Notably, the versatility of this protocol is demonstrated by the use of drug-molecule-linked and fluorescence-probe-linked maleimides.
The structural modification of N-aryl indazolols as tautomers of N-aryl indazolones has been established as a hot topic in pharmaceutics and medicinal chemistry. We herein disclose the rhodium(III)-catalyzed 1,4-addition reaction of maleimides with N-aryl indazol-3-ols, which provides the succinimide-bearing indazol-3-ol scaffolds with complete regioselectivity and a good functional group tolerance. Notably, the versatility of this protocol is demonstrated by the use of drug-molecule-linked and fluorescence-probe-linked maleimides.
The succinimide motif
is a privileged core of antipsychotics, anticonvulsants,
and aldose reductase inhibitors such as lurasidone, phensuximide,
ethosuximide, and ranirestat (Figure ).[1] Therefore, the synthesis
and biological evaluation of succinimide derivatives are important
in the fields of medicinal chemistry and drug discovery.[2]
Figure 1
Succinimide-containing bioactive molecules.
Succinimide-containing bioactive molecules.With advances in C–H functionalization reactions,[3] investigations have recently been mainly made
into the direct installation of bioactive scaffolds such as succinimides
into pharmaceutically relevant molecules.[4] To address these issues, maleimides have been intensively employed
as succinimide precursors in the transition-metal-catalyzed C(sp2)–H and C(sp3)–H alkylation reactions
(Scheme ).[5] Mechanistically, succinimide adducts are generated
via a 1,4-addition pathway, where the migratory insertion of internal
olefins of maleimides is followed by the protonation of the C–metal
intermediates. Alternatively, maleimides can undergo migratory insertion, syn-coplanarity arrangement, and β-hydride elimination
or E1cB elimination to afford olefinated compounds,[6] which can be further trapped by internal nucleophiles through
a Michael-type reaction to produce spirosuccinimides.[7]
Scheme 1
Installation of Succinimides via C–H Functionalization
(A) Installation of succnimides
via C–H functionalization. (B) Indazol-3-ol-assisted incorporation
of succinimides (this work).
Installation of Succinimides via C–H Functionalization
(A) Installation of succnimides
via C–H functionalization. (B) Indazol-3-ol-assisted incorporation
of succinimides (this work).Indazolones and
their analogous have attracted great attention
by virtue of their biological applications as anticancer, anti-inflammatory,
analgesic, antipsychotic, antiviral, and antihyperlipidemic agents.[8] To this end, the transition-metal-catalyzed C–H
modification of N-aryl indazol-3-ones with α-diazo
carbonyls, alkynes, acrylates, and nitroalkenes has been explored.[9] Driven by our efforts toward the direct integration
of two bioactive scaffolds via catalytic C–H functionalization,[10] we herein describe the Rh(III)-catalyzed 1,4-addition
of maleimides with N-aryl indazolols as tautomers
of N-aryl indazolones, which rapid assembles succinimide-containing
indazol-3-ols. The gram-scale experiments and synthetic transformations
illustrate the practicality of the current methodology. Importantly,
the developed protocol is highlighted by its application to drug-molecule-linked
and fluorescence-probe-linked maleimides as coupling partners.
Results
and Discussion
The reaction conditions were optimized by
reacting N-aryl indazol-3-ol 1a and N-phenyl
maleimide (2a) under Rh(III) catalysis. The results are
summarized in Table . A cationic Rh(III) catalyst in the absence of external additives
was found to be unreactive (Table , entry 1). To our delight, the combination of a cationic
Rh(III) catalyst with HOAc promoted the reaction of 1a and 2a to afford 3a in a 51% yield (Table , entry 2). However,
a 28% yield of 3a was formed in the absence of AgSbF6 under otherwise identical reaction conditions (Table , entry 3). These results indicated
that a cationic [RhCp*Ln(SbF6)] catalyst (Ln = OAc or SbF6) might be an active catalyst in the catalytic cycle and the
HOAc might facilitate the protonation step of a rhodacycle intermediate.
Acid screening revealed that PivOH was found to be superior to HOAC
and AdCO2H (Table , entries 4 and 5, respectively). Changing the silver additive
to AgNTf2 gave a 32% yield of 3a (Table , entry 6). Evaluation
of the solvents indicated that acetone was an optimal solvent, forming
our desired product 3a in a 92% yield (Table , entries 7–10). Using
a decreased amount of PivOH (50 mol %) resulted in the decreased formation
of 3a, as shown in entry 11. Other catalysts such as
Ru(II) and Co(III) were found to be less effective (Table , entries 12 and 13, respectively).
Finally, using a lower loading of the Rh(III)Cp* catalyst (1 mol %)
under otherwise identical conditions afforded 3a (56%),
as shown in entry 14.
Table 1
Optimization of Reaction
Conditionsa
entry
additive (mol %)
solvent
yield (%)b
1
AgSbF6 (10)
DCE
N.R.
2
AgSbF6 (10), AcOH (100)
DCE
51
3
AcOH (100)
DCE
28
4
AgSbF6 (10), PivOH (100)
DCE
62
5
AgSbF6 (10), AdCO2H (100)
DCE
45
6
AgNTf2 (10), PivOH (100)
DCE
32
7
AgSbF6 (10), PivOH (100)
MeCN
trace
8
AgSbF6 (10),
PivOH (100)
EtOH
50
9
AgSbF6 (10), PivOH (100)
HFIP
30
10
AgSbF6 (10), PivOH (100)
acetone
92
11
AgSbF6 (10), PivOH (50)
acetone
62
12c
AgSbF6 (10), PivOH (100)
acetone
trace
13d
AgSbF6 (10), PivOH (100)
acetone
20
14e
AgSbF6 (10), PivOH (100)
acetone
56
Reaction conditions are as follows: 1a (0.2
mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [RhCp*Cl2]2 (2.5 mol %), additive (quantity noted), and solvent
(1 mL) at 80 °C for 20 h under air in pressure tubes.
Yield by flash column chromatography.
[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (2.5 mol %) was used as a catalyst.
[CoCp*(CO)I2] (5 mol
%) was used as a catalyst.
[RhCp*Cl2]2 (1 mol %) was used.
Reaction conditions are as follows: 1a (0.2
mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), [RhCp*Cl2]2 (2.5 mol %), additive (quantity noted), and solvent
(1 mL) at 80 °C for 20 h under air in pressure tubes.Yield by flash column chromatography.[Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (2.5 mol %) was used as a catalyst.[CoCp*(CO)I2] (5 mol
%) was used as a catalyst.[RhCp*Cl2]2 (1 mol %) was used.With the successful optimization
results in hand, the substrate
scope of maleimides and N-aryl indazol-3-ols was
examined, as shown in Scheme . The reaction of N-aryl maleimides 2b and 2c with 1a provided the desired
products 3b (95%) and 3c (76%), respectively.
Linear and branched N-alkylated maleimides 2d–2g smoothly participated in the alkylation
reaction at the ortho-C–H bond on the N-aryl ring of 1a, affording the corresponding
products 3d–3g in high yields. In
addition, this method could be applied to NH-free, N-benzyl, and N-allyl maleimides 2h–2j, producing 3h–3j, respectively,
in 50–69% yields. Moreover, maleimide 2k derived
from l-alanine amino ester was found to be a viable substrate
in this transformation. To observe the difunctionalization and monofunctionalization
on bis-maleimide 2l, the modified reaction conditions
were first subjected into 1a. The desired product 3l was obtained in an 88% yield. The monofunctionalized product 3m was also obtained in a 60% yield under the standard reaction
conditions along with a 12% yield of the bis-adduct 3l. Furthermore, the developed protocol was applied to the site-selective
C–H functionalization of maleimides 2m–2p generated from complex drugs and a fluorescence probe.
For examples, maleimide derivatives 2m (from metronidazole), 2n (from celecoxib), and 2o (from estrone) provided
succinimide-linked drug molecules 3n–3p, respectively, in 50–72% yields. Additionally, a maleimide 2p with a fluorescence probe architecture was smoothly coupled
with 1a to furnish 3q in a 50% yield.
Scheme 2
Substrate Scope of Maleimides and N-Aryl Indazol-3-ols
Reaction conditions are as follows: 1a–1n (0.2 mmol), 2a–2p (0.4
mmol), [RhCp*Cl2]2 (2.5 mol
%), AgSbF6 (10 mol %), PivOH (100 mol %), and acetone (1
mL) at 80 °C for 20 h under air in pressure tubes.
Bisalkylated adduct 3l was also obtained in a 12% yield.
[RhCp*(OAc)2] (5 mol %) was used in the absence
of AgSbF6 under otherwise identical conditions.
Substrate Scope of Maleimides and N-Aryl Indazol-3-ols
Reaction conditions are as follows: 1a–1n (0.2 mmol), 2a–2p (0.4
mmol), [RhCp*Cl2]2 (2.5 mol
%), AgSbF6 (10 mol %), PivOH (100 mol %), and acetone (1
mL) at 80 °C for 20 h under air in pressure tubes.Yield by flash column chromatography.1a (0.6 mmol), 2l (0.2 mmol), [RhCp*Cl2]2 (5 mol %),
AgSbF6 (20 mol %), and PivOH (200 mol %) were used.Bisalkylated adduct 3l was also obtained in a 12% yield.[RhCp*(OAc)2] (5 mol %) was used in the absence
of AgSbF6 under otherwise identical conditions.After establishing a robust method for the C–H
alkylation
reaction using maleimides and N-phenyl indazol-3-ol
(1a), the optimized reaction conditions were subsequently
subjected into various N-aryl indazol-3-ols 1b–1l and N-methyl maleimide
(2d). Regardless of the electronic property on the aryl
ring, para-substituted N-aryl indazol-3-ols 1b–1g readily reacted with 2d to give 4b–4g. It is noteworthy
that electron-deficient groups such as CF3 (1f) and NO2 (1g), which are functional groups
that often cause problems in catalytic C–H functionalization
reactions, were also suitable in this coupling reaction. Interestingly,
the meta-NO2-substituted substrate 1h provided a significantly lower yield of 4h (13%) under the standard reaction conditions. After screening the
reaction conditions, we found that compound 1h could
be efficiently coupled with 2d using a neutral Rh(III)Cp*(OAc)2 catalyst, furnishing 4h in a 92% yield. Complete
regioselectivity at less-congested C–H bonds was also observed
in other meta-substituted substrates, namely 1i and 1j. The chemical structures of ortho-alkylated indazol-3-ols were elucidated by the X-ray
crystallographic analysis of 4j (CCDC 2149880) (see the SI for details). Moreover, substrates 1k and 1l bearing C5-substituents on the indazol-3-ol
ring were also viable in the C–H alkylation reaction. However,
compound 1m with a pyrazolopyridin-3-ol backbone was
completely unreactive, potentially due to the competitive coordination
of both nitrogen atoms on indazole and the pyridine cores to the Rh(III)
center. N-Heteroaryl-substituted indazol-3-ol 1n was also found to be an unfavorable substrate for this
transformation, potentially due to the tight coordination of the two
N atoms on 1n to the Rh catalyst in bidentate manner.
It is noted sterically hindered maleimide 2q, maleate 2r as a cis-olefin, and dihydropyrrol-2-one 2s were also unsuccessful in this coupling reaction.Subsequently, gram-scale experiments were performed by the reactions
of 1a (1 g) with 2a and 2d,
providing 3a (1.31 g, 71%) and 3d (1.16
g, 75%), respectively (Scheme ).
Scheme 3
Gram-Scale Experiments
To understand the mechanistic pathway, we performed deuterium labeling
experiments (Scheme ). The reaction of 1a with 2d in the presence
of CD3CO2D resulted in complete deuterium exchange
(>99% D) at the otho-position of deuterio-1a, indicating the reversible cleavage of ortho-C–H
bonds by a Rh(III) catalyst prior to olefin insertion. On the succinimide
moiety (C4-position) of deuterio-3d, 70% deuteration
was also observed, suggesting that the deuteration of the Rh–C
bond of a reaction intermediate with CD3CO2D
might be involved in the catalytic pathway. Incomplete deuterium labeling
can be explained by enol–keto tautomerization. An intermolecular
kinetic isotope effect (KIE) experiment was also performed by reacting 1a and deuterio-1a in the presence of 2a. A KIE (kH/kD) value of 1.7 was detected, thereby indicating that the C–H
cleavage step might be involved in the rate-determining step. Based
on preliminary mechanistic studies and literature precedent,[5] a plausible reaction mechanism is outlined. A
cationic Rh(III) catalyst undergoes the C–H activation process
with 1a to produce a rhodacycle intermediate A. The coordination and migratory insertion of maleimide 2a deliver a seven-membered rhodacycle intermediate C.
Protonation with PivOH provides our desired product 3a and a recyclable Rh(III) catalyst.
Scheme 4
Mechanistic Investigation
and Proposed Reaction Mechanism
To illustrate the synthetic utility of this protocol, a series
of transformations were performed using a succinimide-containing indazol-3-ol 3d (Scheme ). Triflation of the hydroxyl group on the indazole architecture
produced 5a in a 61% yield. Next, a synthesized adduct 5a was employed in the Pd-catalyzed hydrogenation using Et3SiH, and 6a was afforded in a 72% yield. In addition,
the Suzuki arylation of 5a with arylboronic acid afforded 6b in a 78% yield. Finally, the treatment of 5a with benzimidazole provided the heteroarylated adduct 6c (40%) containing three bioactive scaffolds, namely indazole, benzimidazole,
and succinimide.
Scheme 5
Synthetic Transformations
Condition
A: 5a (0.2
mmol), Et3SiH (3 equiv), Pd2(dba)2 (10 mol %), LiCl (50 mol %), and DMF at 80 °C for 24 h. Condition
B: 5a (0.2 mmol), (p-CF3)Ph-B(OH)2 (2 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (10 mol %), K2CO3 (1 equiv), and DMF/EtOH (2:1) at 90 °C
for 1 h. Condition C: 5a (0.2 mmol), benzimidazole (1.2
equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (20 mol %), K2CO3 (2 equiv) and toluene at 110 °C for 20 h.
Synthetic Transformations
Condition
A: 5a (0.2
mmol), Et3SiH (3 equiv), Pd2(dba)2 (10 mol %), LiCl (50 mol %), and DMF at 80 °C for 24 h. Condition
B: 5a (0.2 mmol), (p-CF3)Ph-B(OH)2 (2 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (10 mol %), K2CO3 (1 equiv), and DMF/EtOH (2:1) at 90 °C
for 1 h. Condition C: 5a (0.2 mmol), benzimidazole (1.2
equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (20 mol %), K2CO3 (2 equiv) and toluene at 110 °C for 20 h.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we demonstrated the synthesis
of succinimide-linked
indazol-3-ol derivatives by reacting N-aryl indazol-3-ols
and maleimides under Rh(III)Cp* catalysis. This methodology is highlighted
by the site-selective alkylation with bioactive-molecule-linked and
chemical-probe-linked maleimides. Gram-scale experiments, mechanistic
investigations, and post-transformations of the synthesized product
are also demonstrated. Good regioselectivity and functional-group
compatibility were achieved.
Experimental Section
General Information
Commercial chemicals and reagents
were employed without further purification unless otherwise stated. N-Aryl indazol-3-ols (1a–1l) were prepared according to the reported literature.[9c,11] Maleimides 2a–2i and 2p were purchased from TCI. Maleimides 2j–2l and 2q were prepared according to the reported
literature.[12] Maleimides 2m–2o were prepared according to the reported literature.[7e] Maleate 2r was purchased from TCI. N-Methyl-1,5-dihydro-2H-pyrrol-2-one (2s) was prepared according to the reported literature.[7e,13] All the reactions were performed in an oil bath using an IKA universal
hot plate magnetic stirrer. Sealed tubes (13 × 100 mm2) purchased
from Fischer Scientific were dried in oven overnight and cooled at
room temperature prior to use. Thin layer chromatography was carried
out using plates coated with Kieselgel 60F254 (Merck). For flash column
chromatography, E. Merck Kieselgel 60 (230–400 mesh) was used.
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (1H, 13C,
and 19F NMR) were recorded on Bruker Unity 300 and 400
MHz spectrometers in a CDCl3, acetone-d6, or DMSO-d6 solution. Chemical
shifts are reported as parts per million (ppm). Resonance patterns
are reported with the notations s (singlet), br (broad), d (doublet),
t (triplet), q (quartet), dd (doublet of doublets), ddd (doublet of
doublet of doublets), dt (doublet of triplets), td (triplet of doublets),
and m (multiplet). In addition, the notation br is used to indicate
a broad signal. Coupling constants (J) are reported
in hertz (Hz). IR spectra were recorded on a Varian 2000 infrared
spectrophotometer. Data are reported as inverse centimeters (cm–1). High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) were recorded
on a JEOL JMS-600 spectrometer.
General Scheme, Procedures,
and Characterization Data for the
Synthesis of N-(Quinolinyl)indazol-3-ol (1n)
To an oven-dried round flask charged with isatoic anhydride
(1na) (1.95 g, 12.0 mmol, 100 mol %) in EtOH (20 mL)
was added 2-hydrazinoquinoline (1nb) (1.91 g, 12.0 mmol,
100 mol %) at room temperature under an air atmosphere. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 3 h at 85 °C. The reaction mixture was
kept at room temperature for 12 h, filtered, and washed with EtOH
to obtain 1.42 g of 1nc as a white solid in a 45% yield.
Next, to an oven-dried round flask charged with 1nc (1.4
g, 5.32 mmol, 100 mol %) was added HCl (1.0 M, 25 mL) at room temperature
under an air atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for 15 min
at room temperature. Then, EtOH (25 mL) was added to the reaction
mixture, and to the resulting mixture was added NaNO2 (1.86
g, 27 mmol, 5.08 equiv) in 15 mL of H2O dropwise at room
temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 3 h at 85 °C.
The resulting mixture was kept at room temperature for 12 h, filtered,
and washed with EtOH and diethyl ether to provide 1.01 g of 1n in a 72% yield as a light yellow solid (Scheme ).
General Procedure
and Characterization Data for the ortho-Alkylation
of N-Aryl Indazol-3-ols
with Maleimides (3a–3q and 4b–4l)
To an oven-dried reaction
tube charged with 1-phenyl-1H-indazol-3-ol (1a) (42.1 mg, 0.2 mmol, 100 mol %), [RhCp*Cl2]2 (3.1 mg, 0.005 mmol, 2.5 mol %), AgSbF6 (6.9 mg,
0.02 mmol, 10 mol %), PivOH (20.4 mg, 0.2 mmol, 100 mol %), and N-phenylmaleimide (2a) (69.3 mg, 0.4 mmol,
200 mol %) was added acetone (1 mL) under an air atmosphere. The resulting
mixture was stirred in oil bath at 80 °C for 20 h. The reaction
mixture was diluted with EtOAc (2 mL) and concentrated in vacuo. The
residue was purified by flash column chromatography (CH2Cl2/EtOAc = 4:1 to 1:1) to afford 3a (70.8
mg) in a 92% yield.
General Procedure for the Gram-Scale Reaction
of 3a
To an oven-dried reaction tube charged
with 1a (1.0 g, 4.8 mmol, 100 mol %), [RhCp*Cl2]2 (74.2
mg, 0.12 mmol, 2.5 mol %), AgSbF6 (165.0 mg, 0.48 mmol,
10 mol %), PivOH (490.2 mg, 4.8 mmol, 100 mol %), and N-phenyl maleimide (2a) (1.66 g, 9.6 mmol, 200 mol %)
was added acetone (24 mL) under an air atmosphere. The resulting mixture
was stirred in an oil bath for 20 h at 80 °C. The reaction mixture
was diluted with EtOAc (20 mL) and concentrated in vacuo. The residue
was purified by flash column chromatography (CH2Cl2/EtOAc = 4:1 to 1:1) to afford 3a (1.31 g) in
a 71% yield.
General Procedure for the Gram-Scale Reaction
of 3d
To an oven-dried reaction tube charged
with 1a (1.0 g, 4.8 mmol, 100 mol %), [RhCp*Cl2]2 (74.2
mg, 0.12 mmol, 2.5 mol %), AgSbF6 (165.0 mg, 0.48 mmol,
10 mol %), PivOH (490.2 mg, 4.8 mmol, 100 mol %), and N-methyl maleimide (2d) (1.07 g, 9.6 mmol, 200 mol %)
was added acetone (24 mL) under an air atmosphere. The resulting mixture
was stirred in an oil bath for 20 h at 80 °C. The reaction mixture
was diluted with EtOAc (20 mL) and concentrated in vacuo. The residue
was purified by flash column chromatography (CH2Cl2/EtOAc = 4:1 to 1:1) to afford 3d (1.16 g) in
a 75% yield.
General Procedure for the Deuterium Labeling
Experiment
To an oven-dried sealed tube charged with 1-phenyl-1H-indazol-3-ol (1a) (42.1 mg, 0.2 mmol, 100
mol %), [RhCp*Cl2]2 (3.1 mg, 0.005 mmol, 2.5
mol %), AgSbF6 (6.9 mg, 0.02 mmol, 10 mol %), N-methyl maleimide
(2d) (44.4 mg, 0.4 mmol, 200 mol %), and acetic acid-d4 (122.1 μL, 2.0 mmol, 10 equiv) was added acetone-d6 (1 mL) under an air atmosphere. The resulting
mixture was stirred in an oil bath for 4 h at 80 °C. The resulting
mixture was diluted with EtOAc (2 mL) and concentrated in vacuo. The
residue was purified by flash column chromatography (CH2Cl2/EtOAc = 8:1 to 1:3) to provide deuterio-1a (30.2 mg, 71%) and deuterio-3d (14.9 mg, 23%).
General
Procedure for Intermolecular KIE Experiment
To an oven-dried
reaction tube charged with 1a (21.0
mg, 0.1 mmol, 50 mol %), deuterio-1a (21.2 mg, 0.1 mmol,
50 mol %, >99% D), [RhCp*Cl2]2 (3.1 mg, 0.005
mmol, 2.5 mol %), AgSbF6 (6.9 mg, 0.02 mmol, 10 mol %), N-methyl maleimide (2d) (44.4 mg, 0.4 mmol,
200 mol %), and acetic acid-d4 (122.1
μL, 2.0 mmol, 10 equiv) was added acetone-d6 (1 mL) under an air atmosphere. The reaction mixture
was stirred in an oil bath for 3 h at 80 °C. The resulting mixture
was diluted with EtOAc (2 mL) and concentrated in vacuo. The residue
was purified by flash column chromatography (CH2Cl2/EtOAc = 10:1 to 3:1) to provide 3d/deuterio-3d′ (10.4 mg) in a 16% yield. The KIE (kH/kD = 1.7) value was calculated from
the relative intensity of ortho-C–H and ortho-C–D (7.402 ppm) on 3d and deuterio-3d′, respectively.
General Procedure and Characterization
Data for the Triflation
of 3d
To an oven-dried reaction tube charged
with 3d (321.3 mg, 1.0 mmol, 100 mol %) and trifluoromethanesulfonic
anhydride (423.2 mg, 1.5 mmol, 150 mol %) was added CH2Cl2 (10 mL) under an air atmosphere at room temperature.
The resulting mixture was stirred for 1 h at room temperature.
The reaction mixture was diluted with EtOAc (10 mL) and concentrated
in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography
(n-hexanes/EtOAc = 6:1 to 2:1) to afford 5a (276.6 mg) in a 61% yield.
General Procedure and Characterization Data for the Hydrogenation
of 5a
To an oven-dried reaction tube charged
with 5a (90.7 mg, 0.2 mmol, 100 mol %), Pd(dba)2 (11.5 mg, 0.02 mmol, 10 mol %), LiCl (4.2 mg, 0.1 mmol,
50 mol %), and DMF (1 mL) was added Et3SiH (95.8 μL,
0.6 mmol, 3 equiv) dropwise under an air atmosphere. The resulting
mixture was stirred in an oil bath for 24 h at 80 °C. The resulting
mixture was extracted with brine and EtOAc (3 × 10 mL). The combined
organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and concentrated under
reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash column chromatography
(n-hexanes/EtOAc = 6:1 to 2:1) to afford 6a (44.2 mg) in a 72% yield.
General Procedure and Characterization Data for the Suzuki Arylation
Reaction of 5a
To an oven-dried reaction tube
charged with 5a (90.7 mg, 0.2 mmol, 100 mol %),
4-(trifluoromethyl)phenylboronic acid (76.0 mg, 0.4 mmol, 200
mol %), Pd(PPh3)4 (23.1 mg, 0.02 mmol,
10 mol %), and K2CO3 (27.6 mg, 0.2 mmol,
1 equiv) was added DMF/EtOH (2:1, 1 mL) under a N2 atmosphere
at room temperature. The resulting mixture was stirred in an oil bath
for 1 h at 90 °C under a N2 atmosphere. The
resulting mixture was extracted with brine and EtOAc (3 × 10
mL). The combined organic layer was dried over MgSO4 and
concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash
column chromatography (n-hexanes/EtOAc = 3:1 to 2:1)
to afford 6b (70.2 mg) in a 78% yield.
Experimental Procedure and Characterization Data for the Heteroarylation
Reaction of 5a
To an oven-dried sealed tube
charged with 5a (90.7 mg, 0.2 mmol, 100 mol %),
benzimidazole (28.4 mg, 0.24 mmol, 120 mol %), Pd(PPh3)4 (46.2 mg, 0.04 mmol, 20 mol %), and K2CO3 (55.3 mg, 0.4 mmol, 2 equiv) was added toluene
(1 mL) under a N2 atmosphere at room temperature. The reaction
mixture was allowed to stir in an oil bath for 20 h at 110 °C
under a N2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was diluted
with EtOAc (2 mL) and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified
by flash column chromatography (n-hexanes/EtOAc =
1:1 to 1:3) to afford 6c (33.8 mg) in a 40% yield.