Literature DB >> 35557562

Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for differentiating diagnosis between malignant and benign primary gastric gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors: a single-center retrospective study.

Shengxu Li1, Duanyu Lin1, Mingdeng Tang1, Daojia Liu1, Qinghu Lyu1, Jieping Zhang1.   

Abstract

Background: Malignant primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) without treatment with imatinib are prone to bleeding and peritoneum implantation during operation. Therefore, preoperative assessment of the malignant potential of gGIST is essential. The use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) as a non-invasive tool for diagnosis, staging and prognosis evaluation in oncology, may also be useful for gGISTs. In the present study, we analyzed the value of 18F-FDG PET-CT in assessing the malignant potential of gGISTs before treatment.
Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with gGIST by pathology and underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at the same time were collected. The clinicopathological features of 26 patients with gGISTs were retrospectively analyzed at last. The gGIST risk classification was graded according to the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) GIST risk classification criteria [2008]. Lesions were classified as malignant group (moderate- or high-risk category) and benign group (low- or very low-risk category) according to pathology. The relationship between the maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax) and GIST risk category, tumor diameter, Ki-67 index, and mitotic count was analyzed. The cut-off level of SUVmax for the diagnosis of malignant gGIST with the highest sensitivity was calculated based on the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results: The SUVmax, tumor diameter, Ki-67 index, and mitotic count of the 26 gGIST patients were 5.90±4.49, 7.40±4.92 cm, 7.62%±11.76%, (5.96±3.19)/50 high-power field (HPF), respectively. SUVmax was significantly correlated with GIST risk category, Ki-67 index, and mitotic count (r=0.855, 0.860, and 0.690, all P<0.01) but not with tumor diameter (r=0.383, P=0.054). The SUVmax of gGIST was 7.00±4.57 in the malignant group (moderate or high NIH risk category in 20 patients), which was significantly different from that (2.25±0.77) in the benign group (low or extremely low NIH risk category in 6 patients) (t=4.566, P<0.01). ROC curve analysis showed that a SUVmax cut-off of 2.60 was most sensitive for predicting malignant gGIST. When the area under the curve was 0.967, the sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 83.3%. Conclusions: SUVmax may be used as a complementary indicator for predicting the malignant potential of gGISTs before treatment. 2022 Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG); Gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs); maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax); positron emission tomography (PET); risk classification

Year:  2022        PMID: 35557562      PMCID: PMC9086061          DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  28 in total

1.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 1.2021.

Authors:  Margaret von Mehren; John M Kane; Marilyn M Bui; Edwin Choy; Mary Connelly; Sarah Dry; Kristen N Ganjoo; Suzanne George; Ricardo J Gonzalez; Martin J Heslin; Jade Homsi; Vicki Keedy; Ciara M Kelly; Edward Kim; David Liebner; Martin McCarter; Sean V McGarry; Christian Meyer; Alberto S Pappo; Amanda M Parkes; I Benjamin Paz; Ivy A Petersen; Matthew Poppe; Richard F Riedel; Brian Rubin; Scott Schuetze; Jacob Shabason; Jason K Sicklick; Matthew B Spraker; Melissa Zimel; Mary Anne Bergman; Giby V George
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Small gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach showing rapid growth and early metastasis to the liver.

Authors:  Junji Tanaka; Tadayuki Oshima; Kazutoshi Hori; Toshihiko Tomita; Yongmin Kim; Jiro Watari; Koushi Oh; Seiichi Hirota; Takayuki Matsumoto; Hiroto Miwa
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.559

3.  Prognostic value of Ki67 index in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Zhao; Jia Xu; Ming Wang; Zi-Zhen Zhang; Lin Tu; Chao-Jie Wang; Tian-Long Lin; Yan-Yin Shen; Qiang Liu; Hui Cao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-04-15

Review 4.  PET scan imaging in oncology.

Authors:  G Jerusalem; R Hustinx; Y Beguin; G Fillet
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Isis Gayed; Thuan Vu; Revathy Iyer; Marcella Johnson; Homer Macapinlac; Nancy Swanston; Donald Podoloff
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Clinical significance of oncogenic KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

Authors:  J Lasota; M Miettinen
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 5.087

7.  Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Heikki Joensuu
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: relationship between preoperative CT features and pathologic risk stratification.

Authors:  Giulia Grazzini; Sara Guerri; Diletta Cozzi; Ginevra Danti; Silvia Gasperoni; Silvia Pradella; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.098

9.  Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with localized primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Sang Hyun Hwang; Minkyu Jung; Yong Hyu Jeong; KwanHyeong Jo; Soyoung Kim; Jiyoung Wang; Arthur Cho
Journal:  Cancer Metab       Date:  2021-01-28

10.  Is There Pathological Uniformity between the Periphery and Center of a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor?

Authors:  Seong Ji Choi; Kwan Hong Lee; Chan Kyoo Yoo; Jai Hoon Yoon; Ki Seok Jang; Youn Jeong Kim; Hang Lak Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical significance of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in 32 cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Wen Du; Guojin Cui; Kaiping Wang; Shaojie Li
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.