Niamh Mccombe1, Xuemei Ding1, Girijesh Prasad1, Paddy Gillespie2, David P Finn3,4, Stephen Todd5, Paula L Mcclean6, Kongfatt Wong-Lin1. 1. Intelligent Systems Research CentreUlster University, Magee Campus Londonderry BT48 7JL U.K. 2. Health Economic and Policy Analysis Centre, Discipline of EconomicsNational University of Ireland, Galway Galway H91 TK33 Ireland. 3. Galway Neuroscience CentreDepartment of Pharmacology and TherapeuticsSchool of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway Galway H91 TK33 Ireland. 4. Centre for Pain ResearchDepartment of Pharmacology and TherapeuticsSchool of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway Galway H91 TK33 Ireland. 5. Altnagelvin Area HospitalWestern Health and Social Care Trust Londonderry BT47 6SB U.K. 6. Ulster University NI Centre for Stratified Medicine, Biomedical Sciences Research InstituteC-TRIC Londonderry BT47 6SB U.K.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Despite the potential of machine learning techniques to improve dementia diagnostic processes, research outcomes are often not readily translated to or adopted in clinical practice. Importantly, the time taken to administer diagnostic assessment has yet to be taken into account in feature-selection based optimisation for dementia diagnosis. We address these issues by considering the impact of assessment time as a practical constraint for feature selection of cognitive and functional assessments in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. METHODS: We use three different feature selection algorithms to select informative subsets of dementia assessment items from a large open-source dementia dataset. We use cost-sensitive feature selection to optimise our feature selection results for assessment time as well as diagnostic accuracy. To encourage clinical adoption and further evaluation of our proposed accuracy-vs-cost optimisation algorithms, we also implement a sandbox-like toolbox with graphical user interface to evaluate user-chosen subsets of assessment items. RESULTS: We find that there are subsets of accuracy-cost optimised assessment items that can perform better in terms of diagnostic accuracy and/or total assessment time than most other standard assessments. DISCUSSION: Overall, our analysis and accompanying sandbox tool can facilitate clinical users and other stakeholders to apply their own domain knowledge to analyse and decide which dementia diagnostic assessment items are useful, and aid the redesigning of dementia diagnostic assessments. Clinical Impact (Clinical Research): By optimising diagnostic accuracy and assessment time, we redesign predictive and efficient dementia diagnostic assessments and develop a sandbox interface to facilitate evaluation and testing by clinicians and non-specialists.
OBJECTIVE: Despite the potential of machine learning techniques to improve dementia diagnostic processes, research outcomes are often not readily translated to or adopted in clinical practice. Importantly, the time taken to administer diagnostic assessment has yet to be taken into account in feature-selection based optimisation for dementia diagnosis. We address these issues by considering the impact of assessment time as a practical constraint for feature selection of cognitive and functional assessments in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis. METHODS: We use three different feature selection algorithms to select informative subsets of dementia assessment items from a large open-source dementia dataset. We use cost-sensitive feature selection to optimise our feature selection results for assessment time as well as diagnostic accuracy. To encourage clinical adoption and further evaluation of our proposed accuracy-vs-cost optimisation algorithms, we also implement a sandbox-like toolbox with graphical user interface to evaluate user-chosen subsets of assessment items. RESULTS: We find that there are subsets of accuracy-cost optimised assessment items that can perform better in terms of diagnostic accuracy and/or total assessment time than most other standard assessments. DISCUSSION: Overall, our analysis and accompanying sandbox tool can facilitate clinical users and other stakeholders to apply their own domain knowledge to analyse and decide which dementia diagnostic assessment items are useful, and aid the redesigning of dementia diagnostic assessments. Clinical Impact (Clinical Research): By optimising diagnostic accuracy and assessment time, we redesign predictive and efficient dementia diagnostic assessments and develop a sandbox interface to facilitate evaluation and testing by clinicians and non-specialists.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cost-sensitive feature selection; assessment speed-accuracy trade-off; cognitive and functional assessments; dementia and Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis; sandbox GUI application
Authors: Jeannine Skinner; Janessa O Carvalho; Guy G Potter; April Thames; Elizabeth Zelinski; Paul K Crane; Laura E Gibbons Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Bruno Dubois; Howard H Feldman; Claudia Jacova; Harald Hampel; José Luis Molinuevo; Kaj Blennow; Steven T DeKosky; Serge Gauthier; Dennis Selkoe; Randall Bateman; Stefano Cappa; Sebastian Crutch; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Giovanni B Frisoni; Nick C Fox; Douglas Galasko; Marie-Odile Habert; Gregory A Jicha; Agneta Nordberg; Florence Pasquier; Gil Rabinovici; Philippe Robert; Christopher Rowe; Stephen Salloway; Marie Sarazin; Stéphane Epelbaum; Leonardo C de Souza; Bruno Vellas; Pieter J Visser; Lon Schneider; Yaakov Stern; Philip Scheltens; Jeffrey L Cummings Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Youssef H El-Hayek; Ryan E Wiley; Charles P Khoury; Ritesh P Daya; Clive Ballard; Alison R Evans; Michael Karran; José Luis Molinuevo; Matthew Norton; Alireza Atri Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2019 Impact factor: 4.472