Literature DB >> 35557505

Alzheimer's Disease Assessments Optimized for Diagnostic Accuracy and Administration Time.

Niamh Mccombe1, Xuemei Ding1, Girijesh Prasad1, Paddy Gillespie2, David P Finn3,4, Stephen Todd5, Paula L Mcclean6, Kongfatt Wong-Lin1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the potential of machine learning techniques to improve dementia diagnostic processes, research outcomes are often not readily translated to or adopted in clinical practice. Importantly, the time taken to administer diagnostic assessment has yet to be taken into account in feature-selection based optimisation for dementia diagnosis. We address these issues by considering the impact of assessment time as a practical constraint for feature selection of cognitive and functional assessments in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.
METHODS: We use three different feature selection algorithms to select informative subsets of dementia assessment items from a large open-source dementia dataset. We use cost-sensitive feature selection to optimise our feature selection results for assessment time as well as diagnostic accuracy. To encourage clinical adoption and further evaluation of our proposed accuracy-vs-cost optimisation algorithms, we also implement a sandbox-like toolbox with graphical user interface to evaluate user-chosen subsets of assessment items.
RESULTS: We find that there are subsets of accuracy-cost optimised assessment items that can perform better in terms of diagnostic accuracy and/or total assessment time than most other standard assessments. DISCUSSION: Overall, our analysis and accompanying sandbox tool can facilitate clinical users and other stakeholders to apply their own domain knowledge to analyse and decide which dementia diagnostic assessment items are useful, and aid the redesigning of dementia diagnostic assessments. Clinical Impact (Clinical Research): By optimising diagnostic accuracy and assessment time, we redesign predictive and efficient dementia diagnostic assessments and develop a sandbox interface to facilitate evaluation and testing by clinicians and non-specialists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-sensitive feature selection; assessment speed-accuracy trade-off; cognitive and functional assessments; dementia and Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis; sandbox GUI application

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35557505      PMCID: PMC9089816          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2022.3164806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372


  34 in total

1.  The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive-Plus (ADAS-Cog-Plus): an expansion of the ADAS-Cog to improve responsiveness in MCI.

Authors:  Jeannine Skinner; Janessa O Carvalho; Guy G Potter; April Thames; Elizabeth Zelinski; Paul K Crane; Laura E Gibbons
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease: the IWG-2 criteria.

Authors:  Bruno Dubois; Howard H Feldman; Claudia Jacova; Harald Hampel; José Luis Molinuevo; Kaj Blennow; Steven T DeKosky; Serge Gauthier; Dennis Selkoe; Randall Bateman; Stefano Cappa; Sebastian Crutch; Sebastiaan Engelborghs; Giovanni B Frisoni; Nick C Fox; Douglas Galasko; Marie-Odile Habert; Gregory A Jicha; Agneta Nordberg; Florence Pasquier; Gil Rabinovici; Philippe Robert; Christopher Rowe; Stephen Salloway; Marie Sarazin; Stéphane Epelbaum; Leonardo C de Souza; Bruno Vellas; Pieter J Visser; Lon Schneider; Yaakov Stern; Philip Scheltens; Jeffrey L Cummings
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 44.182

3.  A Machine Learning Framework for Assessment of Cognitive and Functional Impairments in Alzheimer's Disease: Data Preprocessing and Analysis.

Authors:  N Vinutha; S Pattar; S Sharma; P D Shenoy; K R Venugopal
Journal:  J Prev Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020

4.  Rationale for use of the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes as a primary outcome measure for Alzheimer's disease clinical trials.

Authors:  Jesse M Cedarbaum; Mark Jaros; Chito Hernandez; Nicola Coley; Sandrine Andrieu; Michael Grundman; Bruno Vellas
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 21.566

5.  Practice effects due to serial cognitive assessment: Implications for preclinical Alzheimer's disease randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Terry E Goldberg; Philip D Harvey; Keith A Wesnes; Peter J Snyder; Lon S Schneider
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2015-03-29

6.  Optimizing Neuropsychological Assessments for Cognitive, Behavioral, and Functional Impairment Classification: A Machine Learning Study.

Authors:  Petronilla Battista; Christian Salvatore; Isabella Castiglioni
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 7.  Tip of the Iceberg: Assessing the Global Socioeconomic Costs of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias and Strategic Implications for Stakeholders.

Authors:  Youssef H El-Hayek; Ryan E Wiley; Charles P Khoury; Ritesh P Daya; Clive Ballard; Alison R Evans; Michael Karran; José Luis Molinuevo; Matthew Norton; Alireza Atri
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.472

8.  Improving the Quality of Dementia Care in General Practice: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Meghan Bourque; Tony Foley
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-11-25

9.  Practical Strategies for Extreme Missing Data Imputation in Dementia Diagnosis.

Authors:  Niamh McCombe; Shuo Liu; Xuemei Ding; Girijesh Prasad; Magda Bucholc; David P Finn; Stephen Todd; Paula L McClean; KongFatt Wong-Lin
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 5.772

10.  Predicting progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia using neuropsychological data: a supervised learning approach using time windows.

Authors:  Telma Pereira; Luís Lemos; Sandra Cardoso; Dina Silva; Ana Rodrigues; Isabel Santana; Alexandre de Mendonça; Manuela Guerreiro; Sara C Madeira
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.