Literature DB >> 35554900

Antigen-Based Point of Care Testing (POCT) for Diagnosing SARS-CoV-2: Assessing Performance.

Vidya Keshav1, Lesley Scott2, Anura David1, Lara Noble1, Elizabeth Mayne3,4, Wendy Stevens1,5.   

Abstract

Currently, the most accurate way to diagnose an active SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection is through detection of viral RNA using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. While RT-PCR tests are the most sensitive for identifying infection, there are significant limitations, such as global access to sufficient test kits, turnaround times (TAT) from specimen collection to test result is often greater than 24 h and the need for skilled operators in accredited laboratories requiring specialized equipment. A rapid test performed at the point of care (POC) could provide a result within an approximate time of 30 min post specimen collection, be performed by a health care worker and comprise a simple workflow, improving both turnaround time and potentially decreasing costs (e.g., transport, cold-chain, skilled laboratory staff, complex equipment). Determining the performance of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests is, however, easier to assess than antigen-based POCT, as residual clinical specimens (swabs in universal transport media [UTM]) are readily available in laboratory environments, and do not require patient informed consent. Evaluating the performance of POCT requires informed-consent driven studies, with patients required to provide a standard of care specimen as well as study evaluation specimens, which is often not acceptable as nasopharyngeal swabbing can be invasive, clinical field trials are costly and time consuming. Many institutions and regulatory bodies also require preliminary data prior to use in field settings. Therefore, we have developed a method to determine the performance of antigen based POCT that can be used by implementers in national healthcare programs, regulators and rapid test developers. The method investigates both quantitative and qualitative parameters, with the latter providing insights into the capability for implementation and national program uptake.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Implementation readiness; Lateral flow assay; Nucleocapsid protein; Performance; Regulation; SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics; SARS-CoV-2 point of care; SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35554900     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2111-0_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review of the Clinical Utility of Cycle Threshold Values in the Context of COVID-19.

Authors:  Sonia N Rao; Davide Manissero; Victoria R Steele; Josep Pareja
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2020-07-28

2.  Viral RNA load as determined by cell culture as a management tool for discharge of SARS-CoV-2 patients from infectious disease wards.

Authors:  Bernard La Scola; Marion Le Bideau; Julien Andreani; Van Thuan Hoang; Clio Grimaldier; Philippe Colson; Philippe Gautret; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  COVID-19 in early 2021: current status and looking forward.

Authors:  Chengdi Wang; Zhoufeng Wang; Guangyu Wang; Johnson Yiu-Nam Lau; Kang Zhang; Weimin Li
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2021-03-08

4.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Real-time RT-PCR in COVID-19 detection: issues affecting the results.

Authors:  Alireza Tahamtan; Abdollah Ardebili
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Urgent need of rapid tests for SARS CoV-2 antigen detection: Evaluation of the SD-Biosensor antigen test for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Francesco Cerutti; Elisa Burdino; Maria Grazia Milia; Tiziano Allice; Gabriella Gregori; Bianca Bruzzone; Valeria Ghisetti
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.168

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.