Literature DB >> 3555420

Relationship among histochemically distinguishable early lesions in multistep-multistage hepatocarcinogenesis.

E Scherer.   

Abstract

The evolution of liver cancer is discussed on the basis of the multistep-multistage hypothesis. In rat liver the sequential generation of the tumor cell via intermediate precancerous cell populations is strongly supported by histopathological evidence (focus-in-focus lesions) indicating precursor-product relationships, inducibility of progression in an initiation-promotion-initiation type of experiment, and by the kinetics of focus and tumor induction. The formation of mouse liver tumors, either spontaneously in susceptible strains, or induced by a short initiating dose of carcinogen, may follow the same general pathway. The frequent observation of focus-in-focus patterns in mouse and the kinetic characteristics of that process favour the sequential development of cancer cell formation. The kinetic analysis suggested that (large) basophilic foci in mouse liver may be the result of spontaneous progression from an initiated cell population which is represented by either the small basophilic foci or by a cell population generally not recognized due to the lack of a suitable marker reaction. Furthermore, the basophilic foci may represent the precursor cell population leading by another step of spontaneous progression to hepatocellular carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3555420     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-71617-1_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol Suppl        ISSN: 0171-9750


  5 in total

1.  Acquisition of the glioblastoma phenotype during astrocytoma progression is associated with loss of heterozygosity on 10q25-qter.

Authors:  H Fujisawa; M Kurrer; R M Reis; Y Yonekawa; P Kleihues; H Ohgaki
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Mice with homozygous disruption of the mdr2 P-glycoprotein gene. A novel animal model for studies of nonsuppurative inflammatory cholangitis and hepatocarcinogenesis.

Authors:  T H Mauad; C M van Nieuwkerk; K P Dingemans; J J Smit; A H Schinkel; R G Notenboom; M A van den Bergh Weerman; R P Verkruisen; A K Groen; R P Oude Elferink
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  Biochemical markers associated with the stages of promotion and progression during hepatocarcinogenesis in the rat.

Authors:  H C Pitot; Y Dragan; L Sargent; Y H Xu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Progression: the terminal stage in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  H C Pitot
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1989-07

5.  Modulation by indomethacin or prostaglandin E2 of the incidence of diethylnitrosamine-induced gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-positive foci in rat liver.

Authors:  G Taton; P Servais; P Galand
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1990-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.